IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Dust Storm
DEChengst
post Oct 31 2005, 05:48 PM
Post #76


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 270
Joined: 29-December 04
From: NLA0:
Member No.: 133



Some info from the CNN website:

"Lemmon said that data returned to Earth Friday by Opportunity showed elevated dust levels at Meridiani Planum, which were measured at an optical depth of about 1.4. The largest dust storm experienced by the rover occurred in June and rated an optical depth of about 2, he added."

(...)

"Lemmon suspects that Opportunity experienced one of the "fingers" of the storm photographed by Sherrod, adding that later atmospheric measurements were lower than the 1.4 optical depth seen earlier, but not quite at the moderate 0.5."

So it's not looking too bad at the moment. Go Oppy smile.gif


--------------------
PDP, VAX and Alpha fanatic ; HP-Compaq is the Satan! ; Let us pray daily while facing Maynard! ; Life starts at 150 km/h ;
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 31 2005, 09:24 PM
Post #77


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



CODE
4. What EDRs did we request?

Expected EDRs by sequence number and image type:

Sol Seq.Ver  ETH ESF EDN EFF ERP Tot  Description
--- -------- --- --- --- --- --- ---- -----------
628 p0767.03 14  0   0   14  0   28   navcam_7x1_az_288_3_bpp
628 p1663.01 6   0   0   6   0   12   navcam_3x1_az_108_1_bpp
630 p0767.03 14  0   0   14  0   28   navcam_7x1_az_288_3_bpp
630 p1663.01 6   0   0   6   0   12   navcam_3x1_az_108_1_bpp


Nothing on 629 at all, and just monitoring on the other two - perhaps something of a hunker-down-mode?

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Oct 31 2005, 09:50 PM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



Yes, it will only be looking a narrow angle from west (288 degree) to south (108 degree) ... I suppose that the summer time the sun would be passing to sunset on that angle.

Or perhaps, that angle is the proposed route so the team wants to focus closer the terrain toward the Mogollon rims. It might means that the rover will advance too. I think that the only change has come out from Pancam Tracking Databaes is that now it does not show any engineering commands that previously had appeared. Still not sure but I noticed and it might be too early to jump conclusions.

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 31 2005, 10:19 PM
Post #79


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



It spotted a few...I have some images somewhere...I will have to dig...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 31 2005, 10:41 PM
Post #80


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Oct 31 2005, 09:50 PM)
It might means that the rover will advance too.


No - when the rover drives, you ALWAYS gets Hazcam imagery, Penultimate, Ultimate, and if it's a long drive, 'Stumble' as well

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Oct 31 2005, 10:53 PM
Post #81


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 753
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



The Pathfinder did indeed image several dust devils. See this paper for a description.

The Pathfinder atmospheric station also recorded the wind and pressure changes associated with a dust devil passing over the lander. See Pathfinder Dust Devil meteorology.


--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Oct 31 2005, 11:10 PM
Post #82


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Nov 1 2005, 07:50 AM)
Yes, it will only be looking a narrow angle from west (288 degree) to south (108 degree) ... I suppose that the summer time the sun would be passing  to sunset on that angle.

*


That's not the way I read the PDT (Pancam Data Tracking, I think it's time to abbreviate this) I beleve that it reads

navcam_7x1_az_288_3_bpp

7 navcam frames centred at az 288 degrees

navcam_3x1_az_108_1_bpp

3 navcam frames centred at az 108 degrees

Note that 288 - 108 = 180. i.e the centres are in opposite directions. Also note that 10 navcam frames generally make a 360 degree pan.

So these two lines should be read together as simply "A 360 degree navcam pan".

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Oct 31 2005, 11:40 PM
Post #83





Guests






QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 31 2005, 09:24 PM)
CODE
4. What EDRs did we request?

Expected EDRs by sequence number and image type:

Sol Seq.Ver  ETH ESF EDN EFF ERP Tot  Description
--- -------- --- --- --- --- --- ---- -----------
628 p0767.03 14  0   0   14  0   28   navcam_7x1_az_288_3_bpp
628 p1663.01 6   0   0   6   0   12   navcam_3x1_az_108_1_bpp
630 p0767.03 14  0   0   14  0   28   navcam_7x1_az_288_3_bpp
630 p1663.01 6   0   0   6   0   12   navcam_3x1_az_108_1_bpp


Nothing on 629 at all, and just monitoring on the other two - perhaps something of a hunker-down-mode?

Doug
*


Looking at the pancam site the last few days, im sure data was received the next sol, which would be sol 630.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 31 2005, 11:45 PM
Post #84


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I worked with some of those Patfinder images once. This is what I got by merging color data with some dust devil imagery. The rest of the stuff I did was lost in a computer crash, and I haven't had the will to go redo it, given the quality of the MER images.



Also, here are a few other images (I did NOT process these, but, as they are scraps from the crash as well, I have no idea where they came from.)



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 1 2005, 08:13 AM
Post #85


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Ted have you ever found the equiv of Pathfinder RAD data. It's listed on the PDS - but you have to be a Nasa funded researcher to grab a copy, I've only been able to grab something that's basically, not too different to the plain EFF's

I think the Pancam Tracking site might be a bit out of date, perhaps they're 'doing' something to it.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Nov 1 2005, 11:04 AM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



From the Mission Status at the NASA/JPL site:

QUOTE
Sol 620: The rover's observations used its panoramic camera to observe a feature informally named "Mogollon Rim" (for an area in Arizona) and onboard magnets. It also checked for dust devils.


My feeling is that the dust devils, "convective wind events" or whatever occur at Meridiani just as at Gusev. Whereas Gusev is dustier, we are able to see the dust devils and the tracks they leave but Meridiani has a cleaner surface covered with the blueberry pavement/armor and the DDs are less visible.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Nov 2 2005, 04:17 PM
Post #87


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Oct 31 2005, 06:10 PM)
That's not the way I read the PDT (Pancam Data Tracking, I think it's time to abbreviate this) I beleve that it reads

navcam_7x1_az_288_3_bpp

7 navcam frames centred at az 288 degrees

navcam_3x1_az_108_1_bpp

3 navcam frames centred at az 108 degrees

Note that 288 - 108 = 180. i.e the centres are in opposite directions. Also note that 10 navcam frames generally make a 360 degree pan.

So these two lines should be read together as simply "A 360 degree navcam pan".

James
*

jamescanvin: Good and smart hint! I didn't know that to make a 360 panoramic pictures needs 10 Navcam.

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
general
post Nov 2 2005, 08:01 PM
Post #88


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 21-June 05
Member No.: 417



Oppy's dusty weekend huh.gif
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/sta...tml#opportunity
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Burmese
post Nov 2 2005, 08:11 PM
Post #89


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 27-April 05
Member No.: 365



always a new twist for the programmers:

"...The morning after a deep sleep, the rover wakes up when solar panels start putting out a prescribed level of energy. However, a dust storm in the Meridiani region reduced sunshine enough on the morning of sol 628 that Opportunity did not wake from deep sleep early enough for the first scheduled activities of that sol. The rover's onboard software properly put Opportunity into self-protective automode for the day,..."

So the programmers now have to program in anticipation of the expected solar panel output as diminished by expected tau for the coming day.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Nov 2 2005, 09:58 PM
Post #90


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Has anybody seen a new picture of the dust storm? Arkansas Sky Observatory seems to be too eastward (or too westward? cool.gif ) now. The last pictures there are showing the storm went more in a southward direction.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 04:11 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.