IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

12 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 12 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
Sol 2 : HiRiseorama and UHF bugs.
ustrax
post May 28 2008, 08:09 AM
Post #136


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2149
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



I'm frankly speechless (and that's difficult to happen...) beholding all this HiRISE stuff... blink.gif
and that windy animation... smile.gif

About HRSC images...Michel Denis told me that the images were indeed attempted but the result is very uncertain, it was also referred that the data is now all on ground, but he added that, if anything is in the images, by no way HRSC results can approach the exceptional image made by MRO HIRISE of the parachute and Phoenix.

Rob...can I hug you? rolleyes.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 28 2008, 09:34 AM
Post #137


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



It says in the comments of the HiBlog entry for the parachute image that apparently the image was taken about 5 seconds after heat shield jettison. Now, here's a rough estimate of the distance of the heatshield to the lander using simulated data from the Phoenix EDL HUD animation:

At shield jettison the stack was moving at about 100 m/s (about 107 actually, but for the sake of simplicity...). 5 seconds later the lander was slowed down to around 85 m/s. Let's approximate the deceleration as linear so that gives 3 m/s*s and the distance travelled by the chute/lander stack is 460 m.
For the heat shield there are two simplest options to consider:

1) Neglecting further gravitational acceleration and air drag and propagating the 100 m/s velocity at separation gives 500 meters travel distance.
2) Applying a rough estimate of vertical gravitational acceleration to the heatshield. At separation it was roughly moving 45deg off vertical so H and V components of the speed are roughly equal at 75 meters/s. After 5 s the vertical velocity would be 93 m/s. Averaging the initial and final velocities gives (100+120)/2 = 110 m/s.

The distance between the aeroshell and heatshield after 5 seconds would then be somewhere in the range of (500-460) and (550-460) meters. That's 40 to 90 meters.

What's the point of all this? I'm suggesting the heatshield should be visible in that crater backdrop image as well, probably as a dark speck. I couldn't find the length of the parachute cords which to use as a yardstick in this oblique perspective (and probably foreshortened) view, but 100 meters looks comfortably within the HiRISE coverage judging by the pixel separation of backshell and parachute and assuming chute cord length of around 30 m.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post May 28 2008, 09:41 AM
Post #138


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 750
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 12



It feels pretty great to have my layman opinions on planetary exploration confirmed by the Mars Program Chief Engineer! mars.gif

UMSF.com is like a fragment of the old days of the internet; full of knowledgeable, friendly people- professionals, enthusiasts and interested onlookers alike all sharing ideas and information.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post May 28 2008, 09:59 AM
Post #139


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1147
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Marseille - FR
Member No.: 678



Hum, look like that Hirise team wil release full frame image of the EDL of Phoenix : http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_008579_9020


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 28 2008, 10:27 AM
Post #140


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Ant103 @ May 28 2008, 11:59 AM) *
Hum, look like that Hirise team wil release full frame image of the EDL of Phoenix : http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_008579_9020

If you enter any number in the URL, it "opens" a page with that number so I'm thinking that's just a glitch with their web.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post May 28 2008, 10:41 AM
Post #141


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1147
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Marseille - FR
Member No.: 678



Okay Gordan wink.gif.

An other question : they don't have put the Sol2 pictures here : http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/..._archive_1.html but, they are visible on the index. Why?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post May 28 2008, 10:47 AM
Post #142


Rover Driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 981
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



from the wind animation it seems the 'string' of the wind sensor is permanently bent... is that right?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post May 28 2008, 11:07 AM
Post #143


Rover Driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 981
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



http://www.spaceflightnow.com/mars/phoenix...27mroradio.html

" Data link between Phoenix and MRO restored" smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Josh Cryer
post May 28 2008, 11:39 AM
Post #144


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 28-May 08
Member No.: 4149



Hey guys, as you might know a lot of the color images that came down last night weren't full resolution, so they suffered a bit for it, but I played around a bit and with slinted's suggestions came up with these pretty images: http://picasaweb.google.com/joshcryer/MarsPhoenixLander/

Anyway, I just wanted to return some appreciation for all the hard work everyone in the enthusiast and professional community puts in. I'll be updating that album within a few minutes of them being uploaded on the site. I hope to improve my knowledge of this field considerably more! smile.gif

Take care all.

PS I know the skies are wrong in my images, don't shoot me!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post May 28 2008, 12:02 PM
Post #145


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5548
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Hey Josh,

Nice pics, looking forward to seeing what you do with the ones that follow.

BTW: welcome aboard! About time you were here! smile.gif





--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post May 28 2008, 12:43 PM
Post #146


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1147
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Marseille - FR
Member No.: 678



Wecome Josh wink.gif nice pics you have made smile.gif

Here is a try to making a colorization of the Hirise-EDL pic :
http://www.astrosurf.com/merimages/Upload/...orisationV2.jpg


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post May 28 2008, 01:52 PM
Post #147


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 1062



QUOTE (lyford @ May 27 2008, 09:42 PM) *
So I am guessing that the team won't be on Mars time? rolleyes.gif


Actually, the team is on Mars time, I think it has to do with the MRO/Odyssey passes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post May 28 2008, 01:53 PM
Post #148


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 132
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



QUOTE (tuvas @ May 27 2008, 04:10 PM) *
I think this might just be the first lander that Tim didn't find even from the HiRISE images. No, wait, that would be Opportunity, but that one was easy... The first one that was not positively known where it was might be more like it... Hmm...


Actually, I found the Opportunity lander YEARS before HiRISE imaged it! biggrin.gif

But it is true that MOC got it before I did. I had a very Eagle-like crater identified, but since we couldn't see much outside the crater, we didn't know it was Eagle until MOC imaged the site.

QUOTE
I hope personally they do a repeat with MSL...


MARDI will be the first to image the MSL landing site, and I'm a team member! smile.gif

Mars is cool.

-Tim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post May 28 2008, 02:45 PM
Post #149


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2762
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (ahecht @ May 28 2008, 04:39 AM) *
I enhanced that image a bit to bring out the reflection in the mirror to show direction:

Thanks, I hadn't realized that was a mirror. I imagine it's an essentially fully reflective mirror. Since it gives us a tiny view of the near zenith sky, it shows very nicely how much darker the sky is overhead than near the horizon (metadata says image altitude is about 11 degrees). I'd also be interested in how the sky hue differs at zenith.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 28 2008, 02:52 PM
Post #150


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Not sure if you've seen this, but the first HiRISE observation (T+11h) is also up: http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/phoenix-hardware_11.php

Regarding this: with low sun angles and exaggerated topography, is this what we should be looking for in MPL landing zone? Note Phoenix' backshell ended upside down as well. The only thing that consistently stands out is the parachute and if it's buried in dust over the years, well... The fact Phoenix landed at the edge of the 3-sigma ellipse doesn't help constrain things, either.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

12 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 12 >
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 08:57 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.