IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Ancient Northerly Tsunamis, Debris Resurfacing in Chryse Planitia
HSchirmer
post Dec 5 2022, 07:10 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



UPDATES ON THE VIKING 1 LANDING SITE-

Abstract
In 1976, NASA's Viking 1 Lander (V1L) was the first spacecraft to operate successfully on the Martian surface.
The V1L landed near the terminus of an enormous catastrophic flood channel, Maja Valles.
However, instead of the expected megaflood record, its cameras imaged a boulder-strewn surface of elusive origin. We identified a 110-km-diameter impact crater (Pohl) ~ 900 km northeast of the landing site, stratigraphically positioned
-A above catastrophic flood-eroded surfaces formed ~ 3.4 Ga during a period of northern plains oceanic inundation and
-B below the younger of two previously hypothesized megatsunami deposits.
These stratigraphic relationships suggest that a marine impact likely formed the crater.
Our simulated impact-generated megatsunami run-ups closely match the mapped older megatsunami deposit's margins and predict fronts reaching the V1L site.
The site's location along a highland-facing lobe aligned to erosional grooves supports a megatsunami origin.
Our mapping also shows that Pohl's knobby rim regionally represents a broader history of megatsunami modification involving circum-oceanic glaciation and sedimentary extrusions extending beyond the recorded megatsunami emplacement in Chryse Planitia.
Our findings allow that rocks and soil salts at the landing site are of marine origin, inviting the scientific reconsideration of information gathered from the first in-situ measurements on Mars.

Evidence of an oceanic impact and megatsunami sedimentation in Chryse Planitia, Mars
J. Alexis P. Rodriguez, Darrel K. Robertson, Jeffrey S. Kargel, Victor R. Baker, Daniel C. Berman, Jacob Cohen, Francois Costard, Goro Komatsu, Anthony Lopez, Hideaki Miyamoto & Mario Zarroca

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18082-2
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Dec 12 2022, 11:08 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Interesting. I'd never considered Tsunami-motions in that area, only the outfloww from the continental area.
I'll try to grab the entire paper later.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Dec 13 2022, 12:36 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2547
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (HSchirmer @ Dec 5 2022, 11:10 AM) *
Evidence of an oceanic impact and megatsunami sedimentation in Chryse Planitia, Mars

I expect that this paper will meet with a fairly skeptical response from most of the community.

Whatever happened to the "White Mars" idea that there was never any liquid water on Mars? This is the pendulum swung to the other side smile.gif


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Dec 16 2022, 10:06 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1064
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



The key word in that summation of Nick Hoffman's White Mars hypothesis is 'never'. This is deterministic and the hypothesis can only be true or false. The four Rovers have confirmed beyond doubt that both surface and subsurface water existed on Mars and for extended periods, so the hypothesis is false. This does not mean that at times the CO2 mechanism that underpinned Nick's explanation for physical features could not occur. I don't think the pendulum has swung all that far to the other side. We are confident that there was liquid water on Mars but that this was time limited. The existence of a huge body of water, the Oceanus Borealis is contested although to be fair indications supporting the hypothesis are gradually increasing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Dec 17 2022, 12:27 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Mars may have had liquid surface water when atmospheric pressure and temperature permitted it. I tend to think of this as Ephemeral.water because of it's temporary nature. For the most part, I think of Martian water as subsurface water or Phreatic water. There is also that area above the saturated zone of the water table in the unsaturated pore water or vadose zone which may be under reduced atmospheric pressure, which can be called Vadose water. At depth the pressure amd temperature may be enough to permit normsl liquid water.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:05 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.