IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

85 Pages V  « < 52 53 54 55 56 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
InSight Surface Operations, 26 Nov 2018- 21 Dec 2022
fredk
post Dec 13 2019, 06:13 PM
Post #796


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Nice job pulling out those details, Phil. I think we can even see the shadow of the SEIS shield to its right now!

The illumination on the shield, the fact that the sky appears to be brighter towards the left of the frame, and the putative shadow all point to illumination from the left, ie from the east.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 15 2019, 08:43 AM
Post #797


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



And the mole is on the move again on Sol 373 Digging deeper into Mars...
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Dec 15 2019, 02:50 PM
Post #798


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



Now how will they prevented what happened last time, once it got too low for the arm to keep pinning?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Dec 18 2019, 10:17 PM
Post #799


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



A tweet posted to the Insight Twitter account today states: "The @NASAInSight seismometer has discovered a strange, continuous signal at 2.4 Hz, apparently not related to the lander or weather activity, but excited by a lot of #MarsQuake. This puzzling resonance acts as a natural seismic amplifier!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 18 2019, 10:36 PM
Post #800


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 19 2019, 06:17 AM) *
....This puzzling resonance acts as a natural seismic amplifier!"

Likely associated with this abstract from the recent AGU
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
antipode
post Dec 19 2019, 04:05 AM
Post #801


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 315
Joined: 1-October 06
Member No.: 1206



Does anyone know if there are any preliminary results from the RISE experiment?

P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Dec 19 2019, 11:30 AM
Post #802


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



a quick recap of InSight's first scientific results on today's Nature

‘Marsquakes’ reveal red planet’s hidden geology

I think I read somewhere that the first papers were going to be published this week in Science (or Nature) but I'm not sure
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Dec 20 2019, 03:37 PM
Post #803


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1083
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



“…but that they expected InSight’s landing place to have cohesionless soils because that’s what other Martian landing sites have been like.
InSight seems to have been unlucky enough to land in a place where the soil is compacted into a harder material called a duricrust,…”
What would have happened if they had landed at VL or VL2 landing sites, with high soil cohesion ?
Attached Image
<== VL1 / VL2 ==>
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 22 2019, 12:29 PM
Post #804


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Last hammer session of the year on sol 380

Animated IDC GIF: indicates a slowing of progress as the session progressed, then a minuscule bounce? before a little more downward progress? Hopefully a few more images in the pipeline smile.gif

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Dec 22 2019, 09:12 PM
Post #805


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



^COOL!


Can you combine it with last clip?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 23 2019, 12:44 AM
Post #806


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (Decepticon @ Dec 23 2019, 05:12 AM) *
Can you combine it with last clip?

Here you go.... link
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ddeerrff
post Dec 23 2019, 03:37 AM
Post #807


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 19-April 05
Member No.: 251



Almost as if it is running into something hard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 23 2019, 03:45 AM
Post #808


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (ddeerrff @ Dec 23 2019, 11:37 AM) *
Almost as if it is running into something hard.

The team mentioned a hard duricrust layer, I'm not sure if they know how thick that layer is, but progress of the mole slowed at this depth last time. Fingers crossed it's almost through that harder layer...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 23 2019, 12:21 PM
Post #809


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



The DLR HP3 blog for the mole has been updated (December 23, 2019) smile.gif

Link
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Dec 23 2019, 02:56 PM
Post #810


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Dec 23 2019, 04:45 AM) *
Fingers crossed it's almost through that harder layer...

As the update explains, it seems that the cohesionless sand below the duricrust is the problem. They need friction to make progress.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

85 Pages V  « < 52 53 54 55 56 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 07:26 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.