Juno perijove 8, September 1, 2017 |
Juno perijove 8, September 1, 2017 |
Sep 8 2017, 04:31 PM
Post
#46
|
||
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10151 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Here's an image to compare with the Juno view, almost the correct orientation. It's rendered, not an original image.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
||
Sep 8 2017, 06:50 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 9 2017, 07:46 PM
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 12 2017, 05:30 AM
Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
125-fold Perijove-08 animation on Youtube.
MP4 video, single overlapping scenes, and stills zipped for download. Actually, except the first and the last scene, I've rendered each scene twice, based on two consecutive raws. The stills are JPG, but should be in good quality. PNG would have been too large, regarding upload time and volume. Note, that the stills of consecutive scenes overlap by one still. In order to obtain a seamless movie, skip the first frame of each scene, except the first scene. However, for frame interpolation you might need the first respective still of each scene. |
|
|
Sep 12 2017, 09:29 AM
Post
#50
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
Thanks for sharing these Gerald, there is so much to see in this perijove pass! You've done a grand job blending the different images together also. For me, the only 'issue' is the snapping of the camera path, although this is much less problematic now that the images have smooth blending.
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 15 2017, 05:51 PM
Post
#51
|
|||
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
I shared Gerald's PJ08 sequence over on Twitter and the 150dpi 11m x 2m image was actually printed out to 8.5m x 1.3m fabric!
Tweet thread -------------------- |
||
|
|||
Sep 16 2017, 09:59 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
Here are some upscaled, processed & retimed clips from Gerald's PJ08 animation. They are still works in progress but they do feature a new re-timing method which reduces the appearance of the stepping issue when the animation switches between projected textures. The nested clips are 3 levels deep and the motion vector calculation never has to synthesize more than one frame each time. The previous solution was not nested and the software had to guess up to 10 frames which gave rise to motion artifacts.
This clip features the transition between PJ08 121 & 122 PJ08 108 - 109 -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 18 2017, 01:57 PM
Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
I shared Gerald's PJ08 sequence over on Twitter and the 150dpi 11m x 2m image was actually printed out to 8.5m x 1.3m fabric! Tweet thread Awesome... so where is it hanging? |
|
|
Sep 18 2017, 05:49 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
It's hanging in Lund, Sweden.
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 18 2017, 10:42 PM
Post
#55
|
|||||||
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
After making a few improvements to my Juno-related software I now at last have some processed PJ8 stuff. This is from the PJ8_118 data, first approximately true color/contrast versions:
And the enhanced versions: A subset of the relevant metadata: IMAGE_TIME = 2017-09-01T22:03:23.474 MISSION_PHASE_NAME = PERIJOVE 8 PRODUCT_ID = JNCE_2017244_08C00118_V01 SPACECRAFT_ALTITUDE = 12143.0 km SPACECRAFT_NAME = JUNO SUB_SPACECRAFT_LATITUDE = -28.5406 SUB_SPACECRAFT_LONGITUDE = 329.8497 TITLE = POI's: Dalmatian Zone, Eye of Odin Resolution at nadir: ~8.2 km/pixel |
||||||
|
|||||||
Sep 20 2017, 10:07 AM
Post
#56
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 22 2017, 10:59 PM
Post
#57
|
|||
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
BTW, note that image 114 ("Collision of colours"/"Sharp edge") was taken in lossless compression mode; several people had asked if images near PJ were being degraded by lossy compression. I'd be curious to hear if people thought it made a significant difference. Yes, this makes a significant difference in low contrast areas. Here is a heavily processed image showing the area near the nadir in PJ8_114: I was able to apply a more severe contrast stretch and unsharp mask than I usually do - and without having to worry about compression artifacts. This is a good thing because this is a lower contrast image than most of the Juno images. In a 'normally' compressed image the low contrast regions would have a 'contoured' appearance and/or squares of uniform (or near uniform) brightness and color would be obvious (Gerald posted an example earlier). The lower part of the image is more heavily processed than the upper part since the contrast there is lower in the original data. The difference from ICT compressed images is visually biggest in the blue channel - it is darker than R/G and frequently looks rather uniform or even noisy in ICT compressed images (it has even occurred to me to try to generate synthetic blue images by combining low frequency brightness variations from the blue channel with high frequency information from the green channel). Would it be possible to generate a version of the raw image showing what it would have looked like with typical lossy compression parameters? If this is possible I would be interested in applying the same processing to that version of the image as I did in the image above. By the way I have noticed one minor issue with all of the very high resolution images I have processed (I haven't processed many of these though). Here is an example: There are very narrow gaps between the framelets. This only occurs near the nadir and only in the red channel. I don't think this is an error in my processing. It's easy to fill these gaps and they are very narrow so I consider this a minor issue. |
||
|
|||
Sep 22 2017, 11:16 PM
Post
#58
|
||||||
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
And here are two more images processed from PJ8_114. They show the northern and southern limb:
I processed these images more heavily than I usually do, both because of the low contrast in most of the areas covered by PJ8_114 and also because of the lossless compression. The image at left is especially interesting and appears to show long, narrow and elevated clouds plus associated cloud shadows and vertical relief near the horizon. And here are approximately true color/contrast versions of all three images. The last one isn't exactly impressive and reminds me of Saturn because of the low contrast. I suspect the generally low contrast and fuzziness of these images is mainly because the contrast really is lower here than it is farther from the equator; if this is correct the very high resolution (~2.3 km/pixel at the nadir) is not the main reason for the low contrast. And the associated metadata: IMAGE_TIME = 2017-09-01T21:49:21.459 MISSION_PHASE_NAME = PERIJOVE 8 PRODUCT_ID = JNCE_2017244_08C00114_V01 SPACECRAFT_ALTITUDE = 3472.2 km SPACECRAFT_NAME = JUNO SUB_SPACECRAFT_LATITUDE = 10.1385 SUB_SPACECRAFT_LONGITUDE = 319.5073 TITLE = POI's: Collision of colours, Sharp edge Resolution at nadir: ~2.3 km/pixel |
|||||
|
||||||
Sep 23 2017, 01:32 AM
Post
#59
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2017, 10:17 PM
Post
#60
|
||
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
Here is an image from the departure sequence:
This is the best view of the Great Red Spot from the departure sequence. I processed it mainly as a 'sanity check' to confirm that my color processing (still) results in global color that looks about right. This is image PJ8_161 from the departure sequence. North is up. The image was obtained on 2017-09-02 07:30:25.957 when Juno was about 800,000 km from Jupiter's center. |
|
|
||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 03:45 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |