IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Other Satellites On Tc
tedstryk
post Dec 22 2004, 01:07 PM
Post #1


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Other than the Iapetus encounter, I noticed that flybys of Mimas (108,000 km), Enceladus (189,000 km), and Rhea (153,500km) are mentioned. Is anything planned for these flybys? I would normally just assume no, given their proximity to the Huygens mission (they are all on the 16th). But considering the Ta and Tc information sheets didn't mention the Tethys non-targeted flyby on Ta, I am surprised that they are mentioned at all. Given this, is any imaging planned?

Ted


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 22 2004, 02:35 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



The one I know for sure about is Rhea, where we should get a good view of its giant ray crater (rays are giant, the crater itself maybe fairly small)


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Dec 22 2004, 02:55 PM
Post #3


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Great to hear. Will this include any of the wispy terrain?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Dec 25 2004, 11:17 PM
Post #4


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 22 2004, 02:35 PM)
The one I know for sure about is Rhea, where we should get a good view of its giant ray crater (rays are giant, the crater itself maybe fairly small)

Do you know the approximate latitude and longitude of that crater ? I don't see it in Voyager-derived maps of Rhea (or maybe it's not obvious there), yet most of the areas in view in mid-January were rather well imaged by Voyager 1.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Dec 26 2004, 04:59 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



QUOTE (Bjorn Jonsson @ Dec 25 2004, 06:17 PM)
QUOTE (volcanopele @ Dec 22 2004, 02:35 PM)
The one I know for sure about is Rhea, where we should get a good view of its giant ray crater (rays are giant, the crater itself maybe fairly small)

Do you know the approximate latitude and longitude of that crater ? I don't see it in Voyager-derived maps of Rhea (or maybe it's not obvious there), yet most of the areas in view in mid-January were rather well imaged by Voyager 1.

Top Left bottom image Bjorn. http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/Satu...s/rhea_full.jpg



And link to site where this map was found.
http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/SaturnSatellites/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Dec 26 2004, 05:01 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Another great link with the orginal voyager image with that crater.

http://planetary.org/saturn/rhea.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Dec 26 2004, 03:55 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Wasn 't sure if it was in the Voyager images, nor do I remember the lat and lon of the ray crater. I was just told that the images taken in January will show that ray crater.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Dec 27 2004, 12:09 AM
Post #8


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



I managed to figure this out myself. North seems to be roughly up in this image:

http://ciclops.lpl.arizona.edu/view.php?id=506

Assuming this I made the attached preliminary cylindrical map by adding the Cassini data to areas of lower resolution Voyager coverage. I only very crudely corrected for varying illumination. The big crater at upper left is visible in exactly the same location (but at lower resolution) in the Voyager based map so this map seems to be correct. Longitude 0 is at the center of the map. The next step is to render this thing to see what Cassini will image...
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Dec 27 2004, 05:51 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



^Amazing!

Have you had time to do the same to dione using the recent images?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Jan 11 2005, 02:24 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Interesting...

QUOTE
Spacecraft time (UTC) Ground time (UTC) Event
Jan 16
06:08  Jan 16
07:15  Cassini flies by Mimas
The flyby will be at a distance of 108,000 kilometers (67,000 miles) and a speed of 1.3 kilometers per second (2,900 miles per hour). This is just a little bit closer than Voyager 1 ever got.
06:16 07:23 Cassini flies by Enceladus
The flyby will be at a distance of 189,000 kilometers (117,000 miles) and a speed of 10.2 kilometers per second (22,800 miles per hour). Voyager 2 got 50% closer than that, but with the difference in quality between Cassini''s and Voyager's cameras, the Cassini images will be more informative.
06:26 07:33 Saturn Periapsis
At a distance of 4.8 Saturn radii from the planet (or 290,000 kilometers, or about 180,000 miles), this is just outside the orbit of Enceladus. 
11:58 13:05 Descending ring plane crossing
At a distance of 5.9 Saturn radii from the planet (or 360,000 kilometers, or about 220,000 miles), this is outside Enceladus' orbit, inside the E ring. Particles in the E ring are too small to be hazardous to Cassini.
15:51 16:58 Cassini flies by Rhea
The flyby will be at a distance of 153,500 kilometers (95,400 miles) and a speed of 5.1 kilometers per second (11,400 miles per hour). Voyager 1 got two times closer than that, but with the difference in quality between Cassini''s and Voyager's cameras, the Cassini images will be more informative.



From here bottom of page... http://www.planetary.org/news/2005/huygens...eline_0110.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Jan 11 2005, 05:45 PM
Post #11


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I hope this means they are doing imaging.

06:16 07:23 Cassini flies by Enceladus
The flyby will be at a distance of 189,000 kilometers (117,000 miles) and a speed of 10.2 kilometers per second (22,800 miles per hour). Voyager 2 got 50% closer than that, but with the difference in quality between Cassini''s and Voyager's cameras, the Cassini images will be more informative.

Not to mention that at Voyager's closest approach the scan platform was stuck and it didn't do any imaging at all!

I have noticed that there have been no raw images since those taken January 1. Is this due to the Titan encounter. I know it was going to stop at some point, but I didn't think it was that far out.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 11 2005, 06:48 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jan 11 2005, 10:45 AM)
I hope this means they are doing imaging.

06:16 07:23 Cassini flies by Enceladus
The flyby will be at a distance of 189,000 kilometers (117,000 miles) and a speed of 10.2 kilometers per second (22,800 miles per hour). Voyager 2 got 50% closer than that, but with the difference in quality between Cassini''s and Voyager's cameras, the Cassini images will be more informative.

Not to mention that at Voyager's closest approach the scan platform was stuck and it didn't do any imaging at all!

I have noticed that there have been no raw images since those taken January 1.  Is this due to the Titan encounter.  I know it was going to stop at some point, but I didn't think it was that far out.

I just took a look at the imaging plans for Tc, and yes, Mimas, Enceladus, and Rhea observations are planned to compliment the Iapetus, Tethys, Dione, and Phoebe coverage we have already.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pioneer
post Jan 11 2005, 07:15 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-June 04
Member No.: 80



QUOTE
Mimas, Enceladus, and Rhea observations are planned to compliment the Iapetus, Tethys, Dione, and Phoebe coverage we have already.


Phoebe? huh.gif What observations can we get from such a large distance we didn't get from the June flyby?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 11 2005, 07:50 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (pioneer @ Jan 11 2005, 12:15 PM)
QUOTE
Mimas, Enceladus, and Rhea observations are planned to compliment the Iapetus, Tethys, Dione, and Phoebe coverage we have already.


Phoebe? huh.gif What observations can we get from such a large distance we didn't get from the June flyby?

I meant that we already have regional scale (and in the case of Phoebe, local scale) coverage of Dione, Phoebe, Iapetus, and Tethys, and coverage in Tc will give us Enceladus, Mimas, and Rhea.

Looking at the Enceladus coverage, looks like it will be a gap fill in the leading hemisphere. Not as good as Voyager's best coverage, but it is much better than what we have of that region.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Jan 11 2005, 09:57 PM
Post #15


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Why has no imagery from Jan 1 to Jan 6 when they turned the instruments off been posted?

Ted


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 11:38 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.