IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Perseverance Launch & Cruise
Explorer1
post Jul 30 2020, 04:21 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



At the press conference, they said it seems to have been solved and they have good telemetry!
Presumably it is not worth the trouble to use another Earth-based array for such a brief period, in terms of complexity?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Jul 30 2020, 04:27 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



Emily Lakdawalla has noted that she has not yet been able to get detailed information about Perseverance’s additional EDL cameras.

https://twitter.com/elakdawalla/status/1288650896495144960

Matt Wallace just said that the new EDL cameras are ruggedized versions of standard 1080p cameras, and that they will capture, among other things, images of the parachute filling and of the descent engines blasting. He also mentioned that JPL was goaded into increasing the number of EDL cameras from watching beautiful videos of boosters separating from launch vehicles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jul 30 2020, 04:39 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Tom Tamlyn @ Jul 30 2020, 08:27 AM) *
Emily Lakdawalla has noted that she has not yet been able to get detailed information about Perseverance’s additional EDL cameras.

There's a paper about them all for the upcoming M2020 Space Science Reviews issue. I've seen some stuff in the media about them: https://www.businessinsider.com.au/nasa-mar...ng-video-2020-7


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jul 30 2020, 04:41 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Explorer1 @ Jul 30 2020, 08:21 AM) *
At the press conference, they said it seems to have been solved and they have good telemetry!

At 39 bits/sec. DSN Now shows uplink from Canberra DSS-34, they are probably trying to get the rate up to some normal value.

I have no source of information better than anyone else's.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Steve G
post Jul 30 2020, 05:07 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 29-December 05
From: Ottawa, ON
Member No.: 624



That's a big stress gone. Launches always terrify me. I'll never forget checking the papers to see how Mariner 8 fared, and the Montreal Gazette wrote: MARTIANS SAFE AS ROCKET GOES ASTRAY. That totally ruined my day!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vjkane
post Jul 30 2020, 06:05 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 706
Joined: 22-April 05
Member No.: 351



QUOTE (Tom Tamlyn @ Jul 30 2020, 08:27 AM) *
Emily Lakdawalla has noted that she has not yet been able to get detailed information about Perseverance’s additional EDL cameras.

https://twitter.com/elakdawalla/status/1288650896495144960

Matt Wallace just said that the new EDL cameras are ruggedized versions of standard 1080p cameras, and that they will capture, among other things, images of the parachute filling and of the descent engines blasting. He also mentioned that JPL was goaded into increasing the number of EDL cameras from watching beautiful videos of boosters separating from launch vehicles.

Been wondering when that issue was going to come out. Those special issues for missions have been my go to place for instrument descriptions for, I think, decades now.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jul 30 2020, 09:47 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (vjkane @ Jul 30 2020, 10:05 AM) *
Been wondering when [the M2020 special issue of SSR] was going to come out.

The MSL special issue didn't come out until a month or so after MSL landed, and I wouldn't expect anything faster with this one.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jul 30 2020, 11:39 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



A thorough explanation of everything that happened: https://blogs.nasa.gov/mars2020/2020/07/30/...and-on-its-way/

Tl;dr: Conservative safe mode parameters and an excessively strong signal; all is well now. (DSN shows 10 kb/s download rate!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dlilb200
post Jul 31 2020, 02:56 AM
Post #24


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 6-August 12
Member No.: 6459



Can anyone point me to a solar system simulator that shows the relative positions of Tianwen, Hope and Perserverance? I found Perserverance on NASA’s Eyes not the other two. Tried googling around but no luck. Would be much appreciated!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pioneer
post Aug 9 2020, 02:48 AM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-June 04
Member No.: 80



I'm not sure if this is the right thread to bring this up, but one question I have is what is the maximum weight that Perseverance can store in its sample return containers?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Aug 9 2020, 06:28 AM
Post #26


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Per this page, each sample is max 15g & there are a max of 30 samples, so 450g...just shy of 1 pound in imperial units (454g).

As far as Eyes, been some time since I been on there. Likely that it just tracks US spacecraft. If I recall correctly setting up & maintaining the models is not a trivial effort, plus it relies on near-real time state data which is probably not readily available to NASA for most non-US planetary missions.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vjkane
post Aug 9 2020, 01:37 PM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 706
Joined: 22-April 05
Member No.: 351



QUOTE (nprev @ Aug 8 2020, 10:28 PM) *
Per this page, each sample is max 15g & there are a max of 30 samples, so 450g...just shy of 1 pound in imperial units (454g).

As far as Eyes, been some time since I been on there. Likely that it just tracks US spacecraft. If I recall correctly setting up & maintaining the models is not a trivial effort, plus it relies on near-real time state data which is probably not readily available to NASA for most non-US planetary missions.

Per the Perseverance press kit, the rover carries 43 sample tubes, 5 of which are reserved as witness tubes.

I've read that the team designing the Mars assent vehicle (MAV) is finding it challenging to close a design that could return all the tubes. If memory serves me right (that's less and less reliable these days :<), the number returned might be as low as low 20s to 30ish. (Published presentations are vague on this as the MAV design matures.)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Aug 9 2020, 03:47 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (dlilb200 @ Jul 30 2020, 06:56 PM) *
Can anyone point me to a solar system simulator that shows the relative positions of Tianwen, Hope and Perserverance?

JPL Horizons had some early optically-derived elements for Tianwen-1 but I expect those will rapidly become inaccurate. Hope is being tracked by the DSN but I don't know who is doing their navigation [edit: KinetX is doing it] or if any information is being publicly shared. So any simulation would be fairly schematic.

[Oops, spoke too soon, Hope is on Horizons at EMM (spacecraft ID -62)]


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dlilb200
post Aug 13 2020, 09:12 AM
Post #29


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 6-August 12
Member No.: 6459



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Aug 10 2020, 01:47 AM) *
JPL Horizons had some early optically-derived elements for Tianwen-1 but I expect those will rapidly become inaccurate. Hope is being tracked by the DSN but I don't know who is doing their navigation [edit: KinetX is doing it] or if any information is being publicly shared. So any simulation would be fairly schematic.

[Oops, spoke too soon, Hope is on Horizons at EMM (spacecraft ID -62)]


Thanks very much - I did not know about Horizons - unfortunately I don’t know enough about orbital mechanics to use the data, but provides good motivation to learn!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pioneer
post Aug 14 2020, 01:05 AM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-June 04
Member No.: 80



An update from NASA's website:

Ingenuity recharges its batteries while in flight

Does anyone know how Ingenuity will avoid having its landing legs land on a large rock and tilting it over? From what I understand, it doesn't have a hazard detection system. I'm guessing it will somehow know where it lifted off from and return there after the flight?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 01:20 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.