After Pluto... |
After Pluto... |
Guest_exobioquest_* |
Jan 16 2006, 01:30 AM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
After pluto and any other KBO its set to intercept, how far can NH go before it dies on use? Can it reach the heliopause? Does it have any means of analyzing the heliopause and interstellar wind beyond it?
|
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 01:37 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8785 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Just to add another question, have any candidate KBOs been identified for NH yet?
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 01:54 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
I wouldn't expect them to pick a KBO target right away. There are a couple of new survey telescopes under development which will significantly increase the options while New Horizons in on the way to Pluto. This one for example PAN-STARRS, projected to begin in 2009, is expected to find 20,000 KBO's.
|
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 06:41 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
They said on a press breifing today that they'd start the active search for KB objects about 2012. Post Pluto-encounter, the delta-V capability with the expected onboard fuel is a 1/10 degree wide cone expanding from the point of pluto-intercept. It's not worth the effort to search now for KB objects that will be in that narrow cone after 2015, when things like the Synoptic Survey Telescope will be deep-scanning the sky for KB objects by the hundreds of thousands and more.
|
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 07:47 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8785 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
QUOTE (edstrick @ Jan 15 2006, 11:41 PM) They said on a press breifing today that they'd start the active search for KB objects about 2012. Post Pluto-encounter, the delta-V capability with the expected onboard fuel is a 1/10 degree wide cone expanding from the point of pluto-intercept. It's not worth the effort to search now for KB objects that will be in that narrow cone after 2015, when things like the Synoptic Survey Telescope will be deep-scanning the sky for KB objects by the hundreds of thousands and more. I see; thanks, Ed and Alan. Makes sense; Pluto doesn't have enough mass to alter the spacecraft's course to any significant degree (ta-da, da!) -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 09:14 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 12-June 05 From: Kiama, Australia Member No.: 409 |
QUOTE (edstrick @ Jan 16 2006, 05:41 PM) They said on a press breifing today that they'd start the active search for KB objects about 2012. Post Pluto-encounter, the delta-V capability with the expected onboard fuel is a 1/10 degree wide cone expanding from the point of pluto-intercept. It's not worth the effort to search now for KB objects that will be in that narrow cone after 2015, when things like the Synoptic Survey Telescope will be deep-scanning the sky for KB objects by the hundreds of thousands and more. I think it is a bit more than that. Delta V of say 100-150m/s when travelling at 13km/s equates to a cone of more like 1 deg rather than 1/10 deg |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 09:16 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
"....Pluto doesn't have enough mass to alter the spacecraft's course to any significant degree ...."
Even if it did.... the trajectory past Pluto is almost 100% "constrained". Primary mission science goals REQUIRE radio occultation by BOTH Pluto and Charon. There is essentially one trajectory that can give that result, with the main variation being which 6 1/2 <is that right> orbit of Chiron around Pluto puts it into the right position for the second occultation. |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 09:49 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 12-June 05 From: Kiama, Australia Member No.: 409 |
Quick calculation. Max Delta V anticipated is about 210 m/s, this post Pluto-encounter wide cone expanding from the point of pluto-intercept of almost exactly 2.0 deg. Compare this to the moon as visble from Earth being about 1/2 deg.
That makes a cone 4X that apparaent diameter of the moon. The reason they are not searching yet is twofold. 1. they dont know where that cone will be until after launch 2. just as importantly, even after launch and the cone can be determined, where do you search for an object that will be in this cone in 9 years time. That of course depends on its orbit. The longer you leave the search, the smaller the area that needs to be searched |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 03:52 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 544 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
QUOTE (edstrick @ Jan 16 2006, 12:41 AM) They said on a press breifing today that they'd start the active search for KB objects about 2012. Post Pluto-encounter, the delta-V capability with the expected onboard fuel is a 1/10 degree wide cone expanding from the point of pluto-intercept. It's not worth the effort to search now for KB objects that will be in that narrow cone after 2015, when things like the Synoptic Survey Telescope will be deep-scanning the sky for KB objects by the hundreds of thousands and more. When they do start that search, Pluto (and any KBO targets) will be smack in the middle of the milky way in Sagitarius. This is an area normally avoided by planetoid hunters in the past, because of the dense star field. I wonder how they're going to address this issue? You need very good resolution, on the order of nearly perfect seeing from the ground, to pull anything out of the background. |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 07:31 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 5-May 04 Member No.: 74 |
QUOTE (Holder of the Two Leashes @ Jan 16 2006, 03:52 PM) When they do start that search, Pluto (and any KBO targets) will be smack in the middle of the milky way in Sagitarius. Just because Pluto is there, does that mean that any KBO NH can fly by must also be there? I would think that with a years-long cruise ahead of it, there's a wide swath where a possible KBO could be, if it's at the right distance. |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 07:37 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
QUOTE (ToSeek @ Jan 16 2006, 02:31 PM) Just because Pluto is there, does that mean that any KBO NH can fly by must also be there? I would think that with a years-long cruise ahead of it, there's a wide swath where a possible KBO could be, if it's at the right distance. Here's some real heresy: Why flyby Pluto when more interesting KBOs will likely be discovered between now and 2015? Can NH be retargeted for them? How about some of the interesting ones we know now, including the one that is bigger than Pluto (I will NOT say its unofficial name)? I think we should use Jupiter to whip NH out of the ecliptic to it. -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 09:04 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 12-June 05 From: Kiama, Australia Member No.: 409 |
QUOTE (ToSeek @ Jan 17 2006, 06:31 AM) years-long cruise ahead of it, there's a wide swath where a possible KBO could be, if it's at the right distance. Yes that is true but the wide swath where a possible KBO could is all will be smack in the middle of the milky way in Sagitarius. It is not until about 2011 that the target field has moved into a more favorable location |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 09:13 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 544 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
QUOTE (ToSeek @ Jan 16 2006, 01:31 PM) Just because Pluto is there, does that mean that any KBO NH can fly by must also be there? I would think that with a years-long cruise ahead of it, there's a wide swath where a possible KBO could be, if it's at the right distance. New Horizons will not have many years to live after Pluto, so the KBO's have to be fairly close. They didn't get as much plutonium as they wanted for the RTGs, and there was some question early on as to whether the spacecraft would be at full power even at Pluto. Even if the rendezvous point with the KBO clears the milky way, the object is not stationary in the sky and will have moved there from a point that was in a fairly dense sky background (unless it's in some very weird retrograd orbit). You need to have located it by the time NH reaches Pluto in order for a course change to have maximum effect. |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 09:15 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
QUOTE (Holder of the Two Leashes @ Jan 16 2006, 04:13 PM) New Horizons will not have many years to live after Pluto, so the KBO's have to be fairly close. They didn't get as much plutonium as they wanted for the RTGs, and there was some question early on as to whether the spacecraft would be at full power even at Pluto. Even if the rendezvous point with the KBO clears the milky way, the object is not stationary in the sky and will have moved there from a point that was in a fairly dense sky background (unless it's in some very weird retrograd orbit). You need to have located it by the time NH reaches Pluto in order for a course change to have maximum effect. Any other gas giant planets conveniently along the way where NH could get an extra boost? -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Jan 16 2006, 09:52 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 599 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 16 2006, 01:15 PM) After Jupiter, there are no gas giants to help further on the way to Pluto. Beyond Pluto, there are no known gas giants. It would be fantastic if a gas giant were to found beyond Pluto and that would be in the narrow cone of possble post-Pluto trajectories. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 05:41 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |