Mercury Orbit Insertion, Events and Discussion leading up to MOI |
Mercury Orbit Insertion, Events and Discussion leading up to MOI |
Mar 7 2011, 05:00 AM
Post
#46
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1591 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
I thought we had established that Dione is totally boring.
|
|
|
Mar 7 2011, 11:27 AM
Post
#47
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2254 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
There's not even a single planet/satellite/asteroid/comet that is boring in my opinion (and BTW I suspect you are confusing Dione with Rhea).
There are already some hints from the Messenger flyby data that Mercury is more interesting/complex than previously expected. |
|
|
Mar 8 2011, 05:09 AM
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 890 Joined: 18-November 08 Member No.: 4489 |
QUOTE I thought we had established that Dione is totally boring. well the voyager teem thought that the Jovian moons would be "the moon" boring and boy were they wrong |
|
|
Mar 8 2011, 05:24 AM
Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3241 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Nope Rhea is boring. But it's monotonous surface does make for nice desktop backgrounds. So it's good for something.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Mar 8 2011, 11:02 AM
Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 3108 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Canberra, Australia Member No.: 615 |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2011, 10:53 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2106 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
I wonder what happens if you dial that number at the bottom...
|
|
|
Mar 9 2011, 01:10 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10226 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
I used to do that! For Voyager, not Mariner 10, but it was the same thing. Don Bane from the Public Affairs Office would record a phone message, updated every week during slow times, and daily or more often for busy times like a flyby. It was the equivalent of checking into UMSF every morning.
I'm at LPSC this week... I'll post a few pics when I get back... but regarding Mercury, I asked Sean Solomon if his spacecraft was going to impact on Mercury at the end of the mission so I could have a point to plot on a map. I think he preferred not to think about that just yet... but yes, it will. Still not clear to me if it will be a controlled impact, or just left to strike at an unknown location. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 02:22 AM
Post
#53
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 30-June 05 Member No.: 422 |
I asked Sean Solomon if his spacecraft was going to impact on Mercury at the end of the mission so I could have a point to plot on a map. I think he preferred not to think about that just yet... but yes, it will. Hadn't occurred to me before, Phil, quite how morbid your interests can be. With regard to the demise of MESSENGER, do we know enough about Mercury's gravitational field to be able to estimate how stable the MESSENGER orbit will be? I assume Mercury's gravity is more homogeneous than the Moon's, but perhaps that is counteracted by Solar effects and light pressure? -Kevin |
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 02:41 AM
Post
#54
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8785 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I'd hardly call that a "morbid" interest, kwp. Phil has been diligently mapping space hardware/man-made crash sites on the Moon, and high-speed impacts are obviously of scientific interest since they frequently expose fresh subsurface material. Knowing Messenger's final impact region would greatly facilitate spotting the nice fresh crater it will make from some future Mercury orbiter (Bepi-Columbo?)
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 07:32 AM
Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1452 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
...do we know enough about Mercury's gravitational field to be able to estimate how stable the MESSENGER orbit will be? I'm almost certain we know next to nothing about it. All the flybys so far have mostly been equatorial to stay in the plane of Mercury's orbit for alignment with another flyby. And of course there's only been a handfull of flybys.
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 02:06 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
The Pioneer Venus craft experienced large perturbations from it's proximity to the sun at Venus distance. That affect will be worse at Mercury, and with the Mercurian orbital eccentricity, the effect will be variable over time, too.
(I am deliberately neglecting Messenger altitude and eccentricity, it is still early here) |
|
|
Mar 11 2011, 12:59 AM
Post
#57
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 166 Joined: 20-September 05 From: North Texas Member No.: 503 |
Knowing Messenger's final impact region would greatly facilitate spotting the nice fresh crater it will make from some future Mercury orbiter (Bepi-Columbo?) I wonder if Messenger can survive in orbit long enough to wait until Bepi-Columbo's arrival, before taking that plunge to the surface. We could get a lot more science out of Messenger's demise, if it could remain in orbit that long, and allow Bepi to watch from orbit as the new crater forms. |
|
|
Mar 12 2011, 03:04 PM
Post
#58
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 212 Joined: 19-July 05 Member No.: 442 |
She's getting closer
|
|
|
Mar 13 2011, 05:36 AM
Post
#59
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 89 Joined: 27-August 05 From: Eccentric Mars orbit Member No.: 477 |
I'm almost certain we know next to nothing about it. All the flybys so far have mostly been equatorial to stay in the plane of Mercury's orbit for alignment with another flyby. And of course there's only been a handfull of flybys. From http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/orbit_insertio...tionkeeping.htm QUOTE ...and staying there After MESSENGER arrives in the primary science orbit, small forces, such as solar gravity – the gravitational attraction of the Sun - slowly change the spacecraft's orbit. Although these small forces have little effect on MESSENGER's 12-hour orbit period, they can increase the spacecraft's minimum altitude, orbit inclination, and latitude of the surface point below MESSENGER's minimum altitude. Left uncorrected, the increase in the spacecraft's minimum altitude would prevent satisfactory completion of several science goals. To keep the spacecraft’s minimum altitude below 500 kilometers (310 miles), propulsive maneuvers must occur at least once every Mercury year - one complete revolution around the Sun, or 88 Earth days. The first, third, and fifth maneuvers after Mercury orbit insertion will occur at the farthest orbital distance from Mercury where a minimum amount of propellant will slow the spacecraft just enough to lower the minimum altitude to 200 kilometers (124 miles). The act of lowering the spacecraft’s altitude in this way has an unavoidable side effect of also lowering orbit period by 13-15 minutes. The second and fourth maneuvers after orbit insertion will increase the orbit period back to about 12 hours by speeding up the spacecraft near its closest distance from Mercury. Because the sunshade must protect the main part of the spacecraft from direct sunlight during propulsive maneuvers, the timing of these maneuvers is limited to a few days when Mercury is either near the same point in its orbit as it was during Mercury orbit insertion or near the point where Mercury is on the opposite side of the Sun from that for orbit insertion. Since the spacecraft will be in a long equatorial orbit, it will spend most of its time relatively far from Mercury, where the local lumpiness in the gravity field matters less and the gravity from the Sun and planets matter more. This is how the station-keeping maneuvers can be planned before the gravity field is mapped out. Of course if the gravity field turns out to be much much different from the expectation, they may have to change their plans, but I am sure that mission ops is flexible enough to handle it. |
|
|
Mar 13 2011, 08:43 AM
Post
#60
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 7-December 06 From: Sheffield UK Member No.: 1462 |
I wonder if Messenger can survive in orbit long enough to wait until Bepi-Columbo's arrival, before taking that plunge to the surface. We could get a lot more science out of Messenger's demise, if it could remain in orbit that long, and allow Bepi to watch from orbit as the new crater forms. About 5 years ago I proposed to Paul Helfenstein (Cassini science team member) that at the end of its useful life Cassini could use its remaining fuel to leave Saturn orbit and drop Sunwards to impact on Mercury; the impact to then be observed by Bepi-Columbo. He was interested but I doubt it'll happen. -------------------- It's a funny old world - A man's lucky if he gets out of it alive. - W.C. Fields.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd September 2024 - 11:46 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |