IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Mobile phones in space, Potentially lowering the cost of spacecraft design?
jasedm
post Jan 25 2011, 06:47 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



An interesting mission outlined here proposes to blast a high-street mobile phone into orbit, to determine whether its processing power would be adequate to control a satellite in orbit.

Assuming the components within an ordinary handset can survive in space (it will be partly shielded by the satellite's casing) this might have appreciable effects on cost for some unmanned missions in the future.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
hendric
post Feb 1 2011, 03:31 PM
Post #2


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



Well, the software on a typical mobile phone is not really designed to deal with speeds in the km/s range. Doppler effects would begin to be significant at those speeds, and need to be accounted for in the frequency control of the analog front end.

Typical mobile phones aren't even designed for industrial/military spec temperatures, let alone deep space temps and potential radiation environments. They *might* be OK beneath Earth's protective magnetosphere, but I think the chances of sending an Android phone to Mars, let alone the moon, are pretty much nil.

Another concern is that the handset would be "skipping" across cells so fast that it would never be properly registered in any of them. This is actually one of the primary reasons why cellphones are turned off on planes - not because of the FAA, but because of the FCC:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phones...t#United_States

Maybe they will use satellite phones? They already have to compensate for the first issue, the last issue is irrelevant, and they'll just take their chances on the second one? The article however states they will use a "standard" phone, so it will be interesting to see how they handle those three problems above.


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 05:08 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.