IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Jupiter from HiRise, Wow...just wow!
dvandorn
post Feb 1 2007, 04:56 AM
Post #46


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jan 31 2007, 06:22 PM) *
I can see the headlines now:

"Hubble and Mars Orbiter Prove Uranus Is Round"

tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif

--Emily

So, what you're really asking all of us is, does this data make Uranus look fat???

biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

-the other Doug

p.s. -- those of us guys who have ever been married already know how to answer that question... smile.gif


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mchan
post Feb 1 2007, 07:16 AM
Post #47


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 26-August 05
Member No.: 476



Technically speaking, if Uranus looks fat... blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paxdan
post Feb 1 2007, 08:31 AM
Post #48


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 562
Joined: 29-March 05
Member No.: 221



no no no, it's: "does my planet look big in this?"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Feb 1 2007, 05:43 PM
Post #49


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Hum... I made a better picture with my 130 mm reflector with a Toucam2 in raw mode biggrin.gif

...

Seriously, this image is fantastic ohmy.gif . I'm waiting for an Earth-and-moon-imaging Hirise release -_-


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
csq246
post Feb 1 2007, 11:08 PM
Post #50


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 11-January 07
Member No.: 1583



Hi I'm new, but I figured I might as well jump in now; Do you think it's possible that they could turn it towards Pluto? smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post Feb 1 2007, 11:13 PM
Post #51


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Northern Virginia
Member No.: 1062



QUOTE (csq246 @ Feb 1 2007, 04:08 PM) *
Hi I'm new, but I figured I might as well jump in now; Do you think it's possible that they could turn it towards Pluto? smile.gif


It is possible, but not likely. Jupiter was deemed worth the risk because of it's large size, moons, and the fact that it is a fair amount closer from Mars than from Earth, so we could get a decent picture out of it. Also, it helped to do characterization of the camera, because of it's well-known colors in various wavelengths. Pluto is small, very far away, and all in all, it'd only be a few pixels across, if that. It hasn't been as well characterized, and there isn't an advantage to looking at it from Mars, it just doesn't do anything different.

As an aside, Jason says now he's more interested in HiRISE because it's taken a photo of a "worthy" planet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Feb 3 2007, 03:40 AM
Post #52


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I don't think that using HiRSE for NMO object detection would be a prudent use of this asset during its primary mission, but if we get lucky & MRO is as long-lived as MGS it surely might be a worthy objective of an extended mission. MGS gave some tantalizing hints of the impact rate on Mars, and assessing this risk/opportunity(? smile.gif ) would add lots of immediate value for future manned exporation plans as well as context data for Mars' recent geology.

OT, but for some reason, I'm reminded of the wonderful 1964 movie Robinson Caruso on Mars, and the frequent meteor impacts... rolleyes.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Feb 3 2007, 05:37 AM
Post #53


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



[...]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post Feb 3 2007, 03:04 PM
Post #54


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Northern Virginia
Member No.: 1062



QUOTE (JRehling @ Feb 2 2007, 10:37 PM) *
Unless the zenith orientation features something of exceptional value, MRO has some very good uses pointing at the nadir. (Except at night.)


Actually, most HiRISE/CTX/CRISM pictures are taken off-NADIR, only SHARAD, MARCI, and MCO are anything else. MCO doesn't count either, as it moves on it's own...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GuyMac
post Feb 4 2007, 12:58 AM
Post #55


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 27-October 06
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 1292



QUOTE (Ant103 @ Feb 1 2007, 10:43 AM) *
Seriously, this image is fantastic ohmy.gif . I'm waiting for an Earth-and-moon-imaging Hirise release -_-


There is a moon image BTW.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  « < 2 3 4
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 08:14 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.