Photographic "Footprints", definitions thereof |
Photographic "Footprints", definitions thereof |
Jun 28 2017, 02:07 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 91 Joined: 21-August 06 Member No.: 1063 |
Concerning the definition of a "footprint"
Say a spacecraft flying overhead of planet is pointing its camera rectangular shaped FOV down at the surface. If 1 or more of the 4 corner boundary rays stops intercepting with the surface, is the area under the FOV still considered a "footprint"? Perhaps it only matters if the borsight ray of the FOV intercepts with the planet to qualify as a "footprint" ? I tend to think all of those 4 cornors rays would have to be intecepting the surface to qualify as a "footprint" but I just wanted some clarification maybe from an expert. Thank you. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 06:09 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |