IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Juno Perijove 53, July 31, 2023
Brian Swift
post Aug 29 2023, 05:11 AM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



PJ53 Image Collection. Exaggerated color/contrast.
Attached Image

Full resolution version at https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing?id=15460
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Sep 3 2023, 11:44 PM
Post #17


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



A montage of 15 images of Io, i.e. images 113 to 127. The images are enlarged by a factor of 3 relative to the original data. North is up in all of the images.

Attached Image


Computer generated images with a latitude/longitude grid are also included. They are based on a Voyager/Galileo map of Io.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Oct 8 2023, 07:15 AM
Post #18


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



PJ53 Io EQR Map Exaggerated Color/Contrast 8ppd jpg
Attached Image

16ppd PNG at https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing?id=15556
16ppd natural-ish color/contrast png at https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing?id=15555
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Oct 8 2023, 01:30 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1628
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Interesting those features in the upper left portion of Brian's map seem to show mountain shadows when compared to the white features in a prior map (section shown below). A new one can be seen in the upper left corner of Brian's map very close to the pole.

Attached Image


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Oct 9 2023, 12:30 AM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



Here is a flip view between my map and the corresponding area of the USGS Io map.
(Note, I didn't attempt to align my map with the USGS map.)
Attached Image


Jason already noticed the change in the Volund area in PJ51. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia25964-io-over-the-years
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Oct 9 2023, 03:03 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1628
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Nice to see the blinking animation. The associated feature name I've seen is Vivasvant Patera as per this map. I've yet to see any "Montes" type feature names in this area. The names in the map are distorted on the cylindrical projection so that they look good when projected on a sphere.


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 9 2023, 03:45 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



As far as names go, stay tuned (particularly the ones in the triangle shaped bright area west of Dazhbog).

Yes, there are several mountains in the north polar region. some were previously known, but the new data does give us a better idea on the shape. Since PJ55 is basically a carbon copy of PJ53 but closer we should get a better handle of the shapes of these mountains this weekend. What we don't have a good handle on are the paterae, not a surprise given they're shallower than the mountains are tall so shadows are harder to spot (though not impossible, as Michabo and Thomagata were visible near the limb on PJ53).

Attached Image
Attached Image


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Oct 9 2023, 09:10 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



QUOTE (scalbers @ Oct 9 2023, 08:03 AM) *
Nice to see the blinking animation. The associated feature name I've seen is Vivasvant Patera as per this map. I've yet to see any "Montes" type feature names in this area. The names in the map are distorted on the cylindrical projection so that they look good when projected on a sphere.

My apologies. I got distracted by the changing feature on the right, just below center of the flip view crop, and forgot you were interested in the mountains in the upper left.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Oct 9 2023, 09:51 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1628
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



I can see that both of these corners are pretty interesting to check out!


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Antdoghalo
post Oct 10 2023, 02:41 AM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 226
Joined: 13-October 09
From: Olympus Mons
Member No.: 4972



PJ55 will definitely be a closer up of PJ53 so seeing these changed areas in further detail will be intriguing.


--------------------
"Thats no moon... IT'S A TRAP!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Feb 14 2024, 04:52 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



JIRAM M- and L-band composites from PJ53:

Attached Image
Attached Image


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 10:07 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.