More news regarding (58!) RSL "near" the rover:
http://www.nature.com/news/mars-contamination-fear-could-divert-curiosity-rover-1.20544
Remember that in last year's paper, Dundas and McEwen were clear that the candidates near MSL didn't meet the criteria for RSL's. The most RSL-like events were about 50 km from MSL, to the east, and even those didn't meet all the criteria.
Still, the real news in the Nature article is that they've been targeting the candidates with RMI. I've been meaning to ask if anyone has checked to see if any recent RMI imagery matches the candidate locations from Dundas and McEwen. One sequence with some streaks that caught my eye included this frame:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/msl/redops/ods/surface/sol/01361/soas/rdr/ccam/CR0_518299075PRC_F0542280CCAM03360L1.PNG
But comparing with this mastcam frame:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/01367/mcam/1367ML0066790410601029E01_DXXX.jpg
(the RMI field is just left of centre) it looks clear that the location is not one of the candidates of Dundas and McEwen.
PS - maybe a dedicated RSL thread would make sense, considering that potential RSL observations and discussion will probably be ongoing?
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)