Perseverance - Early Drives, Sols 14-72 |
Perseverance - Early Drives, Sols 14-72 |
Mar 5 2021, 08:51 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10150 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
I am setting up a new thread now for the early drives and continued checkout. Post in here as we start our traverse, sol 14 and on.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Guest_Steve5304_* |
Mar 5 2021, 11:22 PM
Post
#2
|
Guests |
I am setting up a new thread now for the early drives and continued checkout. Post in here as we start our traverse, sol 14 and on. Phil Nice! Do we have any roadmaps for where the rover will be headed yet or is that something we will get in the weeks ahead after the helicopter |
|
|
Mar 5 2021, 11:40 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10150 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Hi Steve. They just had a press conference and image release on the mission website which includes this:
https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/25700/the-r...r-perseverance/ They will decide soon which of the two paths to take, but they seemed to prefer the clockwise path out of the landing area. Later it meets up with the nominal path through the delta. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 01:41 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 248 Joined: 25-February 21 From: Waltham, Massachussetts, U.S.A. Member No.: 8974 |
I have updated my interactive map using an EDL rover down look image with an animation of the first drive, estimated from closely analyzing the animation shown during the press conference:
https://bit.ly/PercyMAP Here is a map of the current location (ca. 4590880.87, 1093294.80, -2569.90, Equirectangular Mars 2000 Sphere projection): I think it is pretty close. Rover should be to scale. [edit] Ah, I see that Phil came up earlier pretty much with the same route. Should have noticed earlier. Anyways, glad it was not a case famous last worlds. -------------------- --
Andreas Plesch, andreasplesch at gmail dot com |
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 04:50 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Florida & Texas, USA Member No.: 482 |
Hi Steve. They just had a press conference and image release on the mission website which includes this: https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/25700/the-r...r-perseverance/ They will decide soon which of the two paths to take, but they seemed to prefer the clockwise path out of the landing area. Later it meets up with the nominal path through the delta. Phil The counter-clockwise route is a little shorter (~5km to delta front). The potential for science targets on the clockwise route seems like a better option even though it adds another km or so to reach the main delta. For instance, the isolated delta remnant would be reached in about 5km and it could be very useful to understanding delta formation and erosion. |
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 10:32 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
Hi Steve. They just had a press conference and image release on the mission website which includes this: They will decide soon which of the two paths to take, but they seemed to prefer the clockwise path out of the landing area. Later it meets up with the nominal path through the delta. Phil They could have used different colours for the first part, I thought the blue and purple were the same colour when I watched the news briefing. |
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 10:42 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
Why did they make the tread pattern curved and not just a straight line ?
|
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 11:11 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Chief Assistant Group: Admin Posts: 1409 Joined: 5-January 05 From: Ierapetra, Greece Member No.: 136 |
Been wondering about that too. To make them stronger than straight lines would? Curiosity's were more like the design in most tires, but then inverted; raised rims instead of grooves.
-------------------- photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.
http://500px.com/sacred-photons & |
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 11:58 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
Been wondering about that too. To make them stronger than straight lines would? Curiosity's were more like the design in most tires, but then inverted; raised rims instead of grooves. I found the answer : "Extensive testing in the Mars Yard at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which built the rover and manages operations, has shown these treads better withstand the pressure from sharp rocks and grip just as well or better than Curiosity's when driving on sand." https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasas-persever...-and-air-brakes |
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 12:48 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 30-January 13 From: Penang, Malaysia. Member No.: 6853 |
|
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 01:45 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Chief Assistant Group: Admin Posts: 1409 Joined: 5-January 05 From: Ierapetra, Greece Member No.: 136 |
I found the answer : "Extensive testing in the Mars Yard at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which built the rover and manages operations, has shown these treads better withstand the pressure from sharp rocks and grip just as well or better than Curiosity's when driving on sand." https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasas-persever...-and-air-brakes I found as much; but nothing on straight vs curved specifically, only in comparison with the pattern on Curie's wheels. -------------------- photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.
http://500px.com/sacred-photons & |
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 02:13 PM
Post
#12
|
||
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 75 Joined: 8-July 15 Member No.: 7566 |
I made this map to show the two paths presented at yesterday's conference, my sense is that they'll decide fairly soon. Exciting times are ahead! The blue route is shorter (~4.6km, >23 sols drive) and safer, whereas the purple route is longer (~6.4km, >32 sols drive) but more scientifically interesting. The estimated times are based on the (aspirational?) 200m per sol that Percy has been designed to reach, of course in reality there'll be scientific stops that will greatly lengthen the journey. Personally, I am a fan of the purple route, it covers a greater diversity of geological terrains and gets a good close-up look at the amazing stratigraphy on the isolated delta butte. |
|
|
||
Mar 6 2021, 02:27 PM
Post
#13
|
||
Member Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 12-August 12 Member No.: 6540 |
I found as much; but nothing on straight vs curved specifically, only in comparison with the pattern on Curie's wheels. “But perhaps the most visible change is in the grousers. They are ten percent taller and run across the width of the wheel in a near straight line. It’s got a slight curvature to it to help give some strength to it,” says JPL engineer Patrick DeGrosse. https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/to-b...s-test-on-mars/ Test wheel victims and survivors: |
|
|
||
Mar 6 2021, 02:53 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Chief Assistant Group: Admin Posts: 1409 Joined: 5-January 05 From: Ierapetra, Greece Member No.: 136 |
Ah. Thanks .
-------------------- photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.
http://500px.com/sacred-photons & |
|
|
Mar 6 2021, 03:15 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 290 Joined: 29-December 05 From: Ottawa, ON Member No.: 624 |
You'd think the Blue path would be more interesting with a large crater and the heat shield not far off the path that I'm certain the engineers would like to have a peek at.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 03:17 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |