IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
HiRISE PDS release, Has anyone done anything yet?
Nirgal
post Dec 18 2007, 04:45 PM
Post #46


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (OWW @ Dec 18 2007, 12:47 PM) *
This CTX image would be a good candidate for a calendar though:

Image P01_001558_1325_XI_47S326W



Wow, phaaaantastic !

OWW, could you also post the original link to the image ?
I could not find it at the MSS CTX web-site ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 18 2007, 05:09 PM
Post #47


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Dec 18 2007, 04:18 PM) *
THEMIS still releases an image every week. Does anyone here look at them?


Yup -I have a THEMIS image of the day item on my dashboard using webclip on OSX.

You have a point about the sustainability. Perhaps it's because the initial 'wow' isn't actually at the science or the image per se - but the capability inferred by the images - the demonstrated ability of the instrument. Once that 'wow - 30cm' or 'wow - 5000 pixels across' has died down - it's hard to find much to be excited about if you're not trained to know what you're looking at.

There are odd-balls to that pattern, you can always get a 'wow - a lander seen from orbit' or 'wow - the Earth!' moment. But generally, I don't think any ammount of outreach effort could maintain a laymans interest in instruments like HiRISE, CTX, THEMIS etc.

What I think I WOULD return to day after day is daily MARCI maps in the way I regularly check into the MODIS rapid response page to see how the UK's looking most days. The MARCI weather reports are a great treat in that regard - nice to see that instrument getting 'out' a little more.

A comparative analysis between MER, Cassini, SOHO, MRO and other missions website stats would be an interesting statistic. I may try and pull together forum-view stats for UMSF to see if the 'traffic' to each section varies in an obvious event-by-event way.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Dec 18 2007, 05:19 PM
Post #48


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 710
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



Nirgal, the image was downloaded from the PDS:
http://pds-imaging.jpl.nasa.gov/Missions/MRO_mission.html
And converted with the img2png tool.

Mcaplinger, I still look at the THEMIS daily releases and I'm sure a lot of people on this board do.
I have to admit I was a bit disappointed that the MOC/CTX daily releases stopped on msss.com. Nirgal's question in the previous post proves that more people hunger for more than the 7 CTX images currently on msss.com. Just dumping it all on the PDS means downloading and converting 50 Mb files, and that may be a bit too much for the average person interested in Mars.

I'm pleasantly surprised though that the weekly weather updates are back:
http://www.msss.com/msss_images/latest_weather.html

Great. Now the same for CTX and I'm in heaven. laugh.gif

EDIT: Doug, you beat me to it on the THEMIS images. So I'm not the only one checking those images as I suspected.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Dec 19 2007, 04:17 AM
Post #49


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (OWW @ Dec 18 2007, 09:19 AM) *
Just dumping it all on the PDS means downloading and converting 50 Mb files, and that may be a bit too much for the average person interested in Mars.

I'll make you all an offer: there are plenty of people on this forum who can process the raw CTX images just as well as we can. Find some images you consider worth sharing from the current released PDS data, process and format them as you like, and I'll link to them from my own page on the MSSS web site and credit you accordingly.

Do it soon and maybe we can get a CTX image on Emily's best of the year list, which would make me very happy.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Dec 19 2007, 05:23 AM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



I'll also point out that the CTX PDS volumes are pretty good; there's a cumindex.tab that has text lines describing each image on every volume, and there's a pre-processed JPEG browse image for each image on the volume.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Dec 19 2007, 06:33 AM
Post #51


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



I'm a big fan of the THEMIS images too, there are some real gems there. I've lost count of the number of times I've stopped what I was supposed to be doing here on my PC and gone back to the recently-released image of Aram Chaos (one of my favourite places on Mars) to just roam around it. smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Dec 19 2007, 06:04 PM
Post #52


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



Very good discussion here ... love those detail image crops !
smile.gif

Here is another of those "jagged-shadow"-shots (detail crop, tone map enhanced, added (false) colors and
virtual airplane shadow as a 50 meter scale ...

original image link:
PSP_001337_1675
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Dec 20 2007, 04:31 AM
Post #53


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Dec 18 2007, 08:18 AM) *
TTHEMIS still releases an image every week. Does anyone here look at them?

Not EVERY week, but yes, I do click when I get Ron Baalke's email. smile.gif


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gndonald
post Dec 20 2007, 12:52 PM
Post #54


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 19-July 05
Member No.: 442



I just looked at the image OWW posted and the two 'zoom-ins' that followed. All I can say is WOW!

They are just incredible, you expect to see camels and I swear if something had walked there we'd be able to see the footprints...

Oh for a faster connection...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Dec 20 2007, 09:10 PM
Post #55


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 710
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Dec 19 2007, 06:23 AM) *
I'll also point out that the CTX PDS volumes are pretty good; there's a cumindex.tab that has text lines describing each image on every volume, and there's a pre-processed JPEG browse image for each image on the volume.

Thanks. That cumindex.tab file is very helpful for finding the cool places. The line describing the image I posted seems to be incorrect though. It says "Proctor Crater dunes", but actually it's the crater to the east of Proctor. Don't know its name.
Also, all CTX images are mirrored/flipped and brighter in the middle. What's up with that?

QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Dec 19 2007, 05:17 AM) *
I'll make you all an offer: there are plenty of people on this forum who can process the raw CTX images just as well as we can. Find some images you consider worth sharing from the current released PDS data, process and format them as you like, and I'll link to them from my own page on the MSSS web site and credit you accordingly. Do it soon and maybe we can get a CTX image on Emily's best of the year list, which would make me very happy.

Interesting. Well, plenty of people on this forum, bring it on! smile.gif Personally, I think credits for a cut/paste/stretch job is a bit over the top though, but that's just me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Dec 20 2007, 09:27 PM
Post #56


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 710
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



QUOTE (gndonald @ Dec 20 2007, 01:52 PM) *
I just looked at the image OWW posted and the two 'zoom-ins' that followed.

Ehhh, I should point out that my CTX-cutout was 50% of full-resolution. N1ckdrake's 'zooms' are not from the same CTX image but from a HiRise image... for those that hadn't noticed this already. rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Dec 20 2007, 11:20 PM
Post #57


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (OWW @ Dec 20 2007, 01:10 PM) *
Also, all CTX images are mirrored/flipped and brighter in the middle. What's up with that?

That's the way they come out of the camera; it's an artifact of the relatively wide angle CTX telescope. There's data on the volumes with all the correction coefficients.

Here's a pretty CTX image I found just by looking at the PDS volumes. It's one of those cracks to the west of Elysium Mons. This is just a small subsection downsampled 2x. For the full impact of CTX, you really need to make mosaics.

Attached Image


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hendric
post Dec 21 2007, 04:37 PM
Post #58


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



Bjorn,
Any chance you could add support for these calibration files to IMG2PNG? I tried it on a data batch, and it looked to me like it wasn't flat-fielding or decompanding. I'll write my own app after the holidays if you don't have time.


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GuyMac
post Dec 21 2007, 05:51 PM
Post #59


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 27-October 06
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 1292



QUOTE (Stu @ Dec 17 2007, 04:38 PM) *
Can I ask something that's been on my mind for a while? Is anyone else out there wondering why the good folks behind the MRO mission aren't making more of its images? Or taking... oh jeez, how do I put this without sounding ungrateful... more exciting, more stimulating images?


Hi Stu, HiRISE now has around 1500 color images released, something like a third of a Terapixel in RGB color. I've only looked at a small fraction, but it is mind-blowing. I had my desktop display set to show a random chunk from a random each, updated every two minutes, but had to turn it off, because so frequently I was stopping to copy the image into a favorites folder and not getting any work done. :-)

We worked hard to get the color processing automated (better late than never!) and further improvements are in the works (stretches that saturate less pixels, better color band co-registration). There had been great interest in this data on this forum early on!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Dec 21 2007, 07:58 PM
Post #60


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



QUOTE (GuyMac @ Dec 21 2007, 07:51 AM) *
I had my desktop display set to show a random chunk from a random each, updated every two minutes, but had to turn it off,

Aaaarrrgghhhhh! (...turns chartreuse with envy...)
How big a bribe would it take to get you to turn it back on and feed it through the web?
(I'd be happy to knit you a monitor cozy, so you wouldn't be distracted... ph34r.gif )


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

10 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 09:24 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.