IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

13 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Spirit cleaner?
centsworth_II
post Jun 29 2007, 03:07 PM
Post #61


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (fredk @ Jun 29 2007, 10:54 AM) *
But fortunately getting to a steeper slope may not mean having to drive uphill.

Right! biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Jun 29 2007, 03:14 PM
Post #62


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



The best they could do for the day that insolation is lowest ( around Ls 95 ) is to tilt to ~34.6deg facing due north , that would result in about 31% more power than a horizontal panel on the same sol.

The initial tilt angle at Low Ridge was 10.8deg which gave them about 15.7% more power than a horizontal panel on that day.

34 degrees is probably way to dangerous but a 20deg slope should be possible and that would yield a 25% increase in power.

The exact improvement varies over time as the suns declination changes - the above numbers are really only good for the weeks around mid winter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jun 29 2007, 03:58 PM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (helvick @ Jun 29 2007, 11:14 AM) *
... the above numbers are really only good for the weeks around mid winter.

That's a good time to have the maximum improvement! biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Jun 29 2007, 05:28 PM
Post #64


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



The subject of tilt begs the question, why don't the panels pivot to track the sun? I'd never thought about that. In the design process, if there's already a motor to unfurl the panels upon landing, couldn't that same motor rotate the panels and shake off dust in the process? I'm sure they thought about it, but I'm curious about the pros and cons.

Apologies if this question was addressed in an earlier thread. I'm a newbie, so I'm just learning how to read blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 29 2007, 05:39 PM
Post #65


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The dust probably wouldn't come off if you tilted the panels - it's fairly clingy. The motors only work one way ( I think) - I think they lock in place on deployment. And of course, what do you do if you end up with an array stuck up at an angle.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Jun 29 2007, 06:15 PM
Post #66


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



Further to the same point, the deployment motors were only expected to work once. Designing and building them so that they would have continued to operate reliably in the Martian environment throughout the mission would have been something else.

TTT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Jun 29 2007, 09:11 PM
Post #67


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



QUOTE (Tom Tamlyn @ Jun 29 2007, 11:15 AM) *
Further to the same point, the deployment motors were only expected to work once. Designing and building them so that they would have continued to operate reliably in the Martian environment throughout the mission would have been something else.

TTT


Ahh, that's the part I wasn't thinking about -- that, and using the motor continuously probably drains more power than you'd gain from tracking the sun. Then, at some unknown point the motor dies, and what if it freezes at a sunrise or sunset position. Well, I'm just glad I wasn't making that particular decision during the design process unsure.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jun 30 2007, 05:14 AM
Post #68


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Cleaned Again: Spirit Self Portrait

http://marswatch.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_...ent/adeck3.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Jun 30 2007, 06:28 AM
Post #69


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



woaw.. she looks good! biggrin.gif

Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Jun 30 2007, 07:19 AM
Post #70


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



But she could look better! Come on you devils/angels! You missed a few spots. cool.gif


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kenny
post Jun 30 2007, 08:34 AM
Post #71


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 547
Joined: 1-May 06
From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia)
Member No.: 759



I never appreciated how variable the dust covering could be from panel to panel until I saw that pan, alan....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Oersted_*
post Jun 30 2007, 09:35 AM
Post #72





Guests






Looks like the cleaning has been more efficient in the center panels (or maybe they were cleaner to begin with?). If it is turbulence that helps clean the panels, maybe it would be a good idea to have "turbulence provokers" on the sun panels of future rovers? Maybe wispy stalks standing up from the rover deck, thin enough to not cast shadows but still churning up the air. Just brainstorming here...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jun 30 2007, 05:37 PM
Post #73


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Being from sol 1229, I think that self portrait was after the first cleaning of this season. The second cleaning, which boosted Spirit's output to 50 W-hrs greater than Opportunity, was on sol 1233. We have gotten only a few navcam images of parts of the deck since then, so it is difficult to see what may have changed.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 1 2007, 10:43 PM
Post #74


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



From the latest Planetary Society report, this description of the sol 1224 cleaning event:
QUOTE
"This [dust-cleaning event] was interesting, different from cleaning events we've had in the past," Squyres said... . "In the past, we've had cleaning events that took place when we were on a summit or a ridgecrest and in the past they have sometimes occurred at night. The rover will shut down in the afternoon with dirty solar panels and wake up in the morning with clean solar panels and we have no idea exactly when it happened. In this particular instance, the rover was awake and busy and active when the event happened so we can pinpoint the timing of it. It happened at 1:20 pm in the afternoon local solar time. Of course, we are now down on a low spot, not up on a ridgecrest of anything. So our speculation –- this is pure speculation at this point – but our speculation is that we took a direct hit from a dust devil. We don't know that. But we are in place where dust devils happen and it's prime time for dust devil activity, the time of day when dust devils seem to be most active."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Jul 2 2007, 12:59 AM
Post #75


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



Yes, only a devil would tidy up so haphazardly.
cool.gif


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

13 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 02:12 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.