Juno Perijove 38, November 29, 2021 |
  |
Juno Perijove 38, November 29, 2021 |
 Dec 1 2021, 12:19 AM
Post
#1
|
||
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 18-September 17 Member No.: 8250  |
Collage of PJ38 initial downlink Jupiter images, Exaggerated Color/Contrast
|
|
 |
 
|
|
|
Dec 5 2021, 01:11 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 140 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
Some nice detail in PJ38
 Jupiter - PJ38-20 - Detail  Jupiter - PJ38-21 - Detail  Jupiter - PJ38-25 - Detail |
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2021, 02:27 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 140 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2021, 03:23 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 140 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
JunoCam was not messing around. The detail this perijove is amazing
 Jupiter - PJ38-26/27 - Detail  Jupiter - PJ38-30 - Detail |
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2021, 05:30 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
Words fail. Beautiful work Kevin.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2021, 06:21 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2998 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
The bank of white stratus clouds in image PJ38-30 is amazing. I can't recall seeing stratus clouds that extensive and well-defined. Do we have an idea of the scale of that image?
--Bill -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2021, 02:47 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 18-September 17 Member No.: 8250 |
Mike,
Is there a problem with PJ38_17 and PJ38_18? I just noticed they are not on the missionjuno site. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2021, 04:50 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2507 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Dec 8 2021, 06:47 PM)  Is there a problem with PJ38_17 and PJ38_18? I just noticed they are not on the missionjuno site. Those showed black monoliths so we had to hold them back from the public  Seriously, if we haven't posted something, it's usually because it still has residual data drops that we are waiting to be filled in. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2021, 06:04 PM
Post
#9
|
||
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 18-September 17 Member No.: 8250 |
I suppose it's not surprising monolith induced wormholes would interfere with data downlinks.
Anyhooo... Here are PJ38 images. Exaggerated Color/Contrast. Using new color balance adapted to JunoCams shifting color response.
Full resolution 19293-by-27897 available at https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing?id=11989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2022, 03:09 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 18-September 17 Member No.: 8250 |
QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Dec 9 2021, 08:50 AM) Those showed black monoliths so we had to hold them back from the public Seriously, if we haven't posted something, it's usually because it still has residual data drops that we are waiting to be filled in. Do you think any more data will come down for the PJ38 partial images, or is it done and we've got all we're going to get? |
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2022, 04:21 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2507 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Feb 2 2022, 07:09 PM) Do you think any more data will come down for the PJ38 partial images, or is it done and we've got all we're going to get? I'll ask, but I suspect those will remain partial. The drops are fairly minimal so I'll see if we can post them. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2022, 04:55 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2507 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Feb 2 2022, 07:09 PM) Do you think any more data will come down for the PJ38 partial images, or is it done and we've got all we're going to get? My understanding from our ops folks is that if you see an image that's marked "partial" on missionjuno, then we have exhausted all ways to fill it in and this is the best we are ever going to get. So PJ38 is all done. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2022, 05:57 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 18-September 17 Member No.: 8250 |
QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 3 2022, 08:55 AM) My understanding from our ops folks is that if you see an image that's marked "partial" on missionjuno, then we have exhausted all ways to fill it in and this is the best we are ever going to get. So PJ38 is all done. Thanks for the clarification. I'm glad that we can at least get partial data when there are problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 11:00 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|
