IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Juno Perijove 24, December 26, 2019
mcaplinger
post Jan 3 2020, 06:01 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



PJ24 happened back on 12/26 but the spacecraft was in solar conjunction until around the end of the year and we are just starting to get the data back. With the holidays it may be next week before images start showing up on missionjuno, so stay tuned.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Gerald
post Feb 11 2020, 02:44 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



This is a partial answer to Björn's question in the PJ 2 and 3 thread.
QUOTE
Has anyone else been flat fielding the JunoCam images and if so, how?

The striping artifacts are most evident in the methane band images. And we have a nice methane band engineering image in PJ24.
During the cruise phase after Earth flyby, I was fairly convinced, that the striping artifacts are mostly an effect of interframe transfer smear and straylight, and studied this extensively.

In order to test for the flat field as a major cause in the less bright Jupiter environment, here an experiment with the mentioned PJ24 image, rendered into a crop of a cylindrical map:
Attached Image

I've run a sequence of an assumed simple familiy of flat fields with one continuous parameter ("codimension 1"). It shows, that one part of the swath shows less striping artifacts for one parameter value, while another part of the swath (but for the same CCD pixel position) shows less artifacts for another parameter value.
I'm considering this as evidence for the hypothesis, that the striping artifacts cannot be removed, at least not completely, by an appropriate constant flat field, but require (additional) modelling of interframe transfer smear and stray light. (I'm aware of the methane band filter characteristics varying with the incidence angle on the CCD. So there remains some residual uncertainty about this conclusion.)
I've been able to model part of the interframe transfer smear and the stray light for EFB images. But I failed to refine the model (within the available time) to a degree that adjustments by those model assumptions introduced less artifacts than we had without those adjustments, meaning that these effects are more complex than I first thought.
I found incidence and emission angle the most significant, but not the only contributors to illumination effects.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- mcaplinger   Juno Perijove 24   Jan 3 2020, 06:01 AM
- - PaulH51   QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Jan 3 2020, 02:01 PM)...   Jan 3 2020, 12:18 PM
- - mcaplinger   The first three images from the somewhat but not v...   Jan 3 2020, 10:39 PM
- - Gerald   Drafts of the four PJ24 Ganymede images and slight...   Jan 4 2020, 01:57 AM
- - Gerald   Cylindrical map derived from #003 and #004: Tent...   Jan 4 2020, 08:35 PM
- - Gerald   North polar hemispherical map (azimuthal, equidist...   Jan 4 2020, 08:37 PM
- - Bjorn Jonsson   An approximately true color/contrast version of im...   Jan 7 2020, 12:26 AM
- - palebutdot   Perijove 24 Jupiter images are now trickling in...   Jan 7 2020, 08:31 AM
- - Kevin Gill   First few Jupiter images processed from Perijove 2...   Jan 7 2020, 03:02 PM
- - volcanopele   No plume that I can see at Chalybes (two Io swaths...   Jan 7 2020, 03:34 PM
- - Bjorn Jonsson   This is a heavily processed north polar projection...   Jan 7 2020, 11:13 PM
- - Sean   PJ24_24 Eichstadt/Doran   Jan 8 2020, 08:03 PM
- - Gerald   Here a version of the north polar CPCs, a north po...   Jan 9 2020, 03:12 AM
- - Gerald   Links to more processed versions of PJ24 images I...   Jan 9 2020, 03:31 AM
- - Gerald   Here a forth-back animation of the northern CPCs: ...   Jan 9 2020, 03:46 AM
- - Sean   Detail from PJ24_24 Detail from PJ24_23   Jan 9 2020, 11:44 PM
- - Brian Swift   Animation of lens flare and Ganymede moving over C...   Jan 15 2020, 11:20 PM
|- - fredk   QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Jan 16 2020, 12:20 A...   Jan 16 2020, 12:38 AM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (fredk @ Jan 15 2020, 04:38 PM) Or ...   Jan 16 2020, 01:52 AM
- - Kevin Gill   The first Southern Fisheye Composite. JNCE_201936...   Jan 16 2020, 02:38 AM
- - Brian Swift   Mike, just curious, did telemetry show any increas...   Jan 16 2020, 06:53 AM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Jan 15 2020, 10:53 P...   Jan 16 2020, 03:32 PM
|- - Brian Swift   QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Jan 16 2020, 07:32 AM...   Jan 17 2020, 07:19 AM
- - Bjorn Jonsson   This is an orthographic mosaic of images PJ24_23, ...   Jan 21 2020, 11:11 PM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (Bjorn Jonsson @ Jan 21 2020, 03:11...   Jan 21 2020, 11:22 PM
- - nprev   Possibly OT, but has any ongoing, permanent degrad...   Jan 22 2020, 02:38 PM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 22 2020, 06:38 AM) has...   Jan 24 2020, 02:07 AM
- - nprev   Gotta say, it's performed spectacularly. Thank...   Jan 24 2020, 08:49 AM
- - Bjorn Jonsson   This is a time-lapse processed from five images (P...   Feb 4 2020, 12:07 AM
- - Gerald   Regarding animations: Despite the increasingly cha...   Feb 4 2020, 05:35 PM
- - Brian Swift   AR Quick Look globes for PJ24 (viewable in Safari ...   Feb 4 2020, 07:07 PM
- - Gerald   This is a partial answer to Björn's question i...   Feb 11 2020, 02:44 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 11:52 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.