IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Will aerocapture work for a Jupiter orbiter/moon lander?
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post Feb 9 2007, 04:33 PM
Post #1





Guests






This is something interesting. But knowing the harsh radiation environment of the giant, I don't know whether it could be used at all. I suppose that a plunge into the atmosphere then achieving a trajectory which leads to a direct encounter with a moon could be used for a lander... Or for a long-living orbiter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
JRehling
post Feb 9 2007, 05:42 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ Feb 9 2007, 08:33 AM) *
This is something interesting. But knowing the harsh radiation environment of the giant, I don't know whether it could be used at all. I suppose that a plunge into the atmosphere then achieving a trajectory which leads to a direct encounter with a moon could be used for a lander... Or for a long-living orbiter.


Radiation should not be a problem: The harm that radiation does is integrated over time, and a quick pass through Jupiter's radiation belts on a single pass would only accumulate a small fraction of the radiation damage that Galileo encountered. The Galileo Entry Probe passed, obviously, through all of Jupiter's radiation belts once with no harmful effects. An aerocapture craft would simply do so twice. The question would be how much more radiation it had to absorb during the rest of its mission. The first few hours wouldn't be the concern.

The idea of a lander for Io or Europa that utilized aerobraking is quite interesting. Ideally, the craft would leave Jupiter's atmosphere with just enough velocity to kiss the orbit of the target moon. Then a powered descent would have similar delta-v requirements to that for a lander headed towards Earth's Moon. Some combination between powered descent and a penetrator could also be apt. In one ideal design, you could have a craft ride ballistically all the way from launch to penetration into the surface of Europa -- I wonder if the specs would work out on that?

Note that the minimum-energy departure from Jupiter would mean a slower pass through the radiation belts, and then the accumulated radiation exposure could be significant. A trajectory to "kiss" Europa's orbit would take a significant amount of radiation on the way out, versus a lot less on the speedy path in. Europa might even be, unluckily, at about the worst-case-scenario distance for radiation exposure on the post-aerobraking trajectory.

You'd definitely hope to get two-for-one value out of the radiation and entry shields. I don't know about the engineering constraints there, but if you could have a heavy metal providing heat shielding as well as protection against charged particles, that would leave a lot more mass for payload.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 08:01 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.