Are these the real Martian colors? |
Are these the real Martian colors? |
Aug 7 2012, 03:11 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 14-January 07 From: France Member No.: 1602 |
We've just got the first color picture from MSL today
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4282 if I understood it well, this is the first time ever that a real color camera has been sent to the Red planet. Something is nagging me though, and certainly this is here in UMSF that I will get the correct and definitive answer. Since the 70s and the Viking missions, there's always been debates about the real color of the surface and skies of Mars. They had indeed come up with funny results during the Viking missions with nearly blue skies! Then came the MERs, and the pictures were, and still are (go Oppy go!), taken through three filters, and then it's all a question of mixing all this together (by now you must have guessed that I am neither a photographer nor a photoshoper!). But as often seen here on this site, everyone has then hers or his own interpretation when it comes to the final result. I have indeed seen here much better looking Martian pics than on the MER site (sometimes, not always) All this to say that up until this morning, we weren't 100% sure that what we were seing was the real Mars, in its true colors but a very close aproximation. Correct? So my question is this: is this picture from MSL the very first one to show us the real Martian colors?? Thanks. |
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 04:51 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Martian Photographer Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 3-March 05 Member No.: 183 |
Well, it is known that Bayer filters hold the magical key to truth. And of course, beauty is truth, so better looking colors are truer. But, I think the truth is being covered up in that image (by a dusty lens cover, no less).
There is no such thing as the one "true color" for something (many illusions rely on this and consumer cameras are generally designed to correct for this). The debate will, sadly, continue. We know approximately what it looks like, and we have seen many products that have colors other than what we would perceive, but contain truth in their own ways. But if you really, truly want real, and do not accept what we measure, you must experience yourself. You cannot even rely on someone else's subjective description of what color seemed true to them--that's worse even than believing a Bayer filter pattern or a calibrated color measurement. |
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 05:02 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 976 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
Well, it is known that Bayer filters hold the magical key to truth. And of course, beauty is truth, so better looking colors are truer. But, I think the truth is being covered up in that image (by a dusty lens cover, no less). There is no such thing as the one "true color" for something (many illusions rely on this and consumer cameras are generally designed to correct for this). The debate will, sadly, continue. We know approximately what it looks like, and we have seen many products that have colors other than what we would perceive, but contain truth in their own ways. But if you really, truly want real, and do not accept what we measure, you must experience yourself. You cannot even rely on someone else's subjective description of what color seemed true to them--that's worse even than believing a Bayer filter pattern or a calibrated color measurement. I could not agree more. Paolo -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 06:18 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 14-January 07 From: France Member No.: 1602 |
Alas, I was born a good hundred years too early for experiencing the Martian truth all by myself! From now on, I will therefore blindly believe in the Bayer filter pattern!!
Thanks a lot Deimos for the explanation! |
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 09:32 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 796 Joined: 27-February 08 From: Heart of Europe Member No.: 4057 |
True colors is relative concept. I don't know about some precise definition. Every human being has slightly different perception of color and this is further affected by eye physiology, so perception is dependent even on context. Lots of visual illusions are based on that (as Deimos wrote, I agree with everything). Even every eye has different color view (you can try this easily). Another thing is brightness. Some objects are so dark, that it's nearly impossible to visualize this on computer screen.
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 09:35 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
Perceived color is such a complex interplay of elements that it almost makes no sense to ask "But what would it look like if I were standing on Mars?" Our eyes evolved to notice differences in reflected sun light in this mostly nitrogen atmosphere, even on this planet in dusk or under artificial light it is often difficult to identify and distinguish colors accurately.
I often think of underwater photography when this discussion come up. What is the "real color" of a fish? Seen in light filtered though 10 meters of sea water? Or close up in an aquarium? With a flash of white light? Through a scuba mask or bare eyed? -------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 09:42 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
I like that underwater analogy, it's very good to help people intuitively understand the problem with the question of color. I'm going to be using that!
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 09:43 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Well, it is known that Bayer filters hold the magical key to truth. That maybe tongue-in-cheek, but I'm looking forward to the one thing Bayer filters have over the classic RGB wheel approach : no more rainbow shadows, dust devils, etc. during 3 exposures. On a side note, I'm somewhat disappointed to see that apparently the lossy algorithm of choice will again be JPEG and not something wavelet-based. -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 09:45 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
See also:
Nagel, Thomas: "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?", The Philosophical Review, Vol. 83, No. 4 (Oct., 1974), pp. 435-450 (Heh, took a lot longer to find the proper reference than the text!) [Edit: fix link, slap forehead] -------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 09:48 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 890 Joined: 18-November 08 Member No.: 4489 |
After years of working in color photo darkrooms
I can tell you that color IS SUBJECTIVE i can look at a print and say" it is perfect " the other owner will say "to blue " the other silent partner might say " nice, but just a bit too warm " so "REAL" color ??????? there is no such thing every one sees things just a bit different |
|
|
Aug 7 2012, 11:33 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 976 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
That maybe tongue-in-cheek, but I'm looking forward to the one thing Bayer filters have over the classic RGB wheel approach : no more rainbow shadows, dust devils, etc. during 3 exposures. On a side note, I'm somewhat disappointed to see that apparently the lossy algorithm of choice will again be JPEG and not something wavelet-based. Are you talking for public release or for transmission to Earth? Paolo -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
Aug 8 2012, 12:33 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2084 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
And of course, even if one was 'standing on Mars', there would still be a piece of glass or plastic between the surface and your retina. (Excepting a minute or two of essentially vacuum, or else terraformed, by which point it would be a different planet entirely).
My opinion? Look in the night sky, and you'll see the sum of every one of the planet's colors. |
|
|
Aug 8 2012, 12:54 AM
Post
#13
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
My opinion? Look in the night sky, and you'll see the sum of every one of the planet's colors. And even that does not result in a clear answer. Due to the extreme contrast between the bright planet and the black sky the color/brightness looks different from what you would see if you were standing on the surface of Mars (just think about the Moon - it looks bright in the sky but in reality the surface is very dark, not unlike asphalt). |
|
|
Aug 8 2012, 03:45 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2084 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
And our pictures from the lunar surface look just as white, since the only thing to contrast it with is the sky, which is just as black.
Though I wonder what effect lunar night may have; we still don't have pictures of that, AFAIK? |
|
|
Aug 8 2012, 04:00 AM
Post
#15
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
...Though I wonder what effect lunar night may have; we still don't have pictures of that, AFAIK? Not much from the surface, no. Though here we do have an image taken by Surveyor 1 of its own foot pad, taken at night by Earthlight. It was a 4-minute exposure, IIRC. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th May 2024 - 03:17 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |