IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Water-cooled lander
tanjent
post Aug 22 2007, 05:22 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 628



There is a recent posting on Emily's Planetary Society blog, which must be Doug's because she's not there herself, although her name is the only name on it. The subject is using water to cool a long-lived surface probe on Venus. It sounds far more practical than any of the other proposals for landing giant atomic-powered refrigerators, or developing a whole new family of high-temperature semiconductors, etc.

But I didn't understand the whispered criticism to the effect that the Ekonomov paper assumed that the water would absorb heat only from the one watt of power driving the instrument package itself. I simply can't believe that he went to the podium and presented his model without taking into account the fact that the surface of Venus is a pretty hot place, and that the proposed probe would be absorbing the ambient heat. This is an interesting proposal and I would like to understand both the original calculation of 50 days to bring the water to a boil, and the cited flaw in the calculation. I too find it hard to believe that it would take 50 days to bring water to a boil on the Venusian surface, but where exactly is the error, and what remains after we correct it?

Doug is busy of course, but I hope he will find the time to address this when he returns, if someone else hasn't done so by then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
tty
post Aug 23 2007, 06:25 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



If we assume that 500 W is a realistic heat input what will happen?

This is very much a back-of-the-envelope calculation, mind you

I assume that we start with 100 kilos of ice at 273 K. To melt 1 gram of ice takes 333 J so 500 Watts will melt 1.5 grams of ice per second. It will take about 67000 seconds to melt 100 kilograms, so temperature will stay stable at 273 K for about 18 hours.
Temperature will then start rising more or less linearly as the water warms up. It takes 4.19 J to raise the temperature of one gram of water one degree. 500 Watts will therefore raise the temperature of about 120 grams of water one degree. So it will take about 830 seconds (slightly less than 14 minutes) for the water to heat up one degree. For the temperature to rise 100 degrees will thus take about 23 hours. However the water won't boil at 100 degrees since the steam can't vent into the atmosphere until the pressure is higher than atmospheric pressure. The phase diagram I have is logarithmic so it's a bit difficult to be sure but it seems that water boils at about 500 K on the surface of Venus. That temperature should be reached after about 50 hours. The water then starts boiling and vents to the atmosphere. It takes 2260 J to boil one gram of water so 500 Watts will boil about 0.22 grams of water per second. To boil away 100 kilos will then take about 450,000 seconds i e about 125 hours. The temperature will then quickly go to ambient.

So temperature should stay at 273 K for about 20 hours then rise to about 500 K over about 50 hours and then stay at 500 K for about 120 hours, altogether a little more than a week.

And yes, I'm aware that the constants I've used vary with temperature and that the heat flux is also dependent on the thermal gradient, and yes, the venting steam will actually cool the surroundings a little (and could probably be routed to maximize this effect).

P.S. It just struck me that by adding a pump to evacuate the steam you could have those 120 hours at 373 K rather than 500 K. It would have to be a very good pump though,
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- tanjent   Water-cooled lander   Aug 22 2007, 05:22 PM
- - helvick   QUOTE ..The concept is based around a 60-centimete...   Aug 22 2007, 06:32 PM
- - tty   Why start at 300 K rather than 270 K? By shielding...   Aug 22 2007, 08:41 PM
- - djellison   Unfortunately - the guy's english wasn't v...   Aug 22 2007, 09:03 PM
- - RJG   These calculations are based on the use of water. ...   Aug 22 2007, 09:59 PM
- - tasp   None of my steam traction engine information sheet...   Aug 22 2007, 11:08 PM
- - Greg Hullender   Tasp: the idea was that the water is INSIDE a glor...   Aug 23 2007, 06:16 AM
|- - marsbug   QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ Aug 23 2007, 07:1...   Aug 23 2007, 01:36 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (marsbug @ Aug 23 2007, 01:36 PM) A...   Aug 23 2007, 01:52 PM
- - djellison   The principle would be to have the pressure vessel...   Aug 23 2007, 12:03 PM
- - AndyG   Marsbug - you're maths is somewhat awry. Thin...   Aug 23 2007, 02:22 PM
- - marsbug   Thanks Doug and AndyG! This makes it seem a bi...   Aug 23 2007, 02:45 PM
|- - AndyG   [Excessive quote removed, hopefully before Doug ca...   Aug 23 2007, 03:23 PM
- - helvick   All the above makes sense but my understanding is ...   Aug 23 2007, 04:13 PM
- - algorimancer   I wonder whether a silica aerogel might be a bette...   Aug 23 2007, 05:36 PM
|- - rlorenz   QUOTE (algorimancer @ Aug 23 2007, 01:36 ...   Aug 24 2007, 07:39 AM
|- - AndyG   QUOTE (rlorenz @ Aug 24 2007, 08:39 AM) J...   Aug 24 2007, 08:45 AM
- - tty   If we assume that 500 W is a realistic heat input ...   Aug 23 2007, 06:25 PM
- - hendric   One idea I've always had for a Venusian balloo...   Aug 23 2007, 07:42 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (hendric @ Aug 23 2007, 07:42 PM) O...   Aug 23 2007, 08:52 PM
- - hendric   Aw dang, all my best ideas get stolen! First ...   Aug 24 2007, 03:04 AM
- - tasp   Thanx for clarifying what I was trying to convey. ...   Aug 24 2007, 03:10 AM
- - Greg Hullender   Taking tty's figures and using 100W instead of...   Aug 24 2007, 09:51 PM
- - djellison   That 50 days is to get up to boiling point - and t...   Aug 25 2007, 02:16 PM
|- - tty   Unfortunately to use the heat of evaporation requi...   Aug 25 2007, 05:51 PM
- - algorimancer   Of course, after the MER experience, anything less...   Aug 26 2007, 12:21 AM
- - nprev   True enough, actually; there's only so much da...   Aug 26 2007, 03:05 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (nprev @ Aug 25 2007, 08:05 PM) Tru...   Aug 26 2007, 04:39 AM
- - tasp   {Going out on a limb here} Could we put a satelli...   Aug 26 2007, 02:39 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (tasp @ Aug 26 2007, 07:39 AM) {Goi...   Aug 26 2007, 03:47 PM
- - ugordan   I'm no expert on radio waves by any means, but...   Aug 26 2007, 02:52 PM
- - Greg Hullender   Summary: According to a 2002 NASA publication, i...   Aug 26 2007, 06:20 PM
- - Greg Hullender   ugordan: As I calculate it, the Sun-Venus L1 point...   Aug 26 2007, 07:12 PM
- - tty   Completely mechanical seismometers were used for a...   Aug 26 2007, 07:20 PM
- - Gsnorgathon   Since the topic's already wandered somewhat fr...   Aug 26 2007, 09:21 PM
- - tasp   I think we would want a retroreflector (and to use...   Aug 27 2007, 02:25 AM
- - Greg Hullender   For some reason, NASA issued a press release yeste...   Sep 13 2007, 12:42 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ Sep 12 2007, 05:4...   Sep 14 2007, 06:20 PM
- - nnyspace   Could a liquid/solid that has a lower density chan...   Nov 7 2007, 05:58 PM
- - djellison   The problem is that the latent heat of evaporation...   Nov 7 2007, 07:05 PM
|- - nnyspace   QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 7 2007, 07:05 PM) ...   Nov 7 2007, 10:01 PM
- - dvandorn   Apollo's Lunar Rover used bee's wax to coo...   Nov 7 2007, 07:12 PM
- - AndyG   So we have wood used in Apollo hatches (is that ri...   Nov 7 2007, 08:31 PM
- - JRehling   QUOTE (AndyG @ Nov 7 2007, 12:31 PM) So w...   Nov 8 2007, 05:21 AM
- - tedstryk   Also, natural materials had been used for a long t...   Nov 8 2007, 11:32 AM
- - ugordan   QUOTE (JRehling @ Nov 8 2007, 06:21 AM) N...   Nov 8 2007, 11:45 AM
- - nnyspace   Speaking of biomaterials, fats, fatty acids and gl...   Nov 8 2007, 06:15 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 11:07 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.