MSL FAQ - The pool of questions |
MSL FAQ - The pool of questions |
Jun 2 2007, 02:07 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 270 Joined: 29-December 04 From: NLA0: Member No.: 133 |
Looking at it from an artistic point of view:
Is there any chance of MastCam tracking and making a movie as the Skycrane flies away, although the mast probably will still be stowed on the rover's deck ? -------------------- PDP, VAX and Alpha fanatic ; HP-Compaq is the Satan! ; Let us pray daily while facing Maynard! ; Life starts at 150 km/h ;
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 03:05 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
Once science is well on the way, are there any plans for examination and study of the EDL hardware?
-------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 03:07 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Is there any chance of MastCam tracking and making a movie as the Skycrane flies away, although the mast probably will still be stowed on the rover's deck ? I would hope that the optics would be orientated so that they would be well out of the way of any rocket exhaust at fly-away. Doug |
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 04:30 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Is there any chance of MastCam tracking and making a movie as the Skycrane flies away, although the mast probably will still be stowed on the rover's deck ? In addition to Doug's observation about protecting the optics, from a risk mitigation standpoint it would be unwise to burden the flight software with a non-essential requirement so quickly after one of the most critical events of the entire mission. MSL's got to get its act together afterwards, we don't need to take a chance on incurring the equivalent of a 'blue screen of death' . (Don't get me wrong, though, DE; I'd really love to see that myself! ) -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 06:46 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
This skycrane/decent stage debate is ending. Now. We've had it before. We're going in circles. Stop. Now. This is a thread for questions about MSL's EDL - not the semantics of naming.
Multiple posts deleted. Doug |
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 07:06 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2511 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Will we be getting "video clips" from MSL? That's a downlinked data volume question; the hardware can certainly do it at up to 10 fps. Of course, nothing much is moving at rates that would justify a frame rate that high; the team is still considering this. (And no, we can't see the descent stage fly away; Mastcam and MAHLI are still turned off and stowed, and MARDI is pointed down.) QUOTE Maybe dedicated imagery of Earth-in-the-sky scenes? I'm certain we'll try this, but we only have 100 mm focal length, so I'm not sure the disk will even be resolved; it'll still just be a blue dot. QUOTE How much more advanced will MSL's imaging instruments be than MER's? I'm not sure how to quantify "more advanced." They're about 100x faster with about the same noise performance. The MER cameras were all fixed-focus. Mastcam has a 10:1 zoom lens with autofocus. MAHLI (the MI equivalent) has adjustable focus with autofocus. All the instruments are capable of realtime image compression and other internal image processing and have 8 GB flash buffers for data storage. They can all take Bayer-pattern color images with one frame (some might call that less advanced than multiple exposures through color filters, but Mastcam can do that too.) On the other hand, they weigh more and are a lot more mechanically complex, which I can assure you is a development challenge. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Guest_Sunspot_* |
Jun 2 2007, 07:16 PM
Post
#22
|
Guests |
Malin Space Science Systems has information on some of the cameras they are building:
http://www.msss.com/msl/mastcam/index.html http://www.msss.com/msl/mahli/index.html http://www.msss.com/msl/mardi/index.html # Each Mast Camera has a 10x telephoto/zoom capability; the field of view (FOV) can be from 6°(zoomed) to 60° (not zoomed). # Near the rover, Mastcam images have a spatial resolution of about 150 micrometers per pixel. With the telephoto system, objects at 1 kilometer distance can be resolved at 10 centimeters per pixel. |
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 07:18 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Here's one for you Mike - I get bayer filters - and I get the normal way of doing filtered obs. How do you set up a CCD to do single shot colour but ALSO do filtered obs as well? Is it like a hybrid bayer filter that has an R, a B but only one G with what would be the 'other' G as a clear for use with filters? (That's a complete and utter guess)
Doug |
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 07:24 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Nice, you guys; sounds like some exciting pics are pending!
Truly off-the-wall Skycrane question here: How much hydrazine is expected to remain in its propellant tanks after a nominal descent? Reason I ask is that if (a big if, admittedly) the tank(s) rupture after impact, it might be interesting for MSL to cautiously approach the wreckage at a safe distance a few sols later in order to take a few spectra of any obviously NH4-'splashed' soil to see what sort of reaction compounds may have formed... a unique opportunity for understanding local minerology if it presents itself and is safe to pursue. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 07:32 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
The amount of fuel in the DESCENT STAGE should be only vapors if the fly away manuver is "successful"
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 07:48 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Ah. So, then, the descent stage is expected to stay airborne until it runs out of fuel, Jim? That seems to place some topographical constraints on the landing site; maybe the landing site slope question is moot.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 07:51 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
Not really, the flyout is independent of landing site slope. Anyways the slope is going to be minor, if any
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 07:56 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I see; thanks! I was wondering about some of the candidate clay-bearing sites in canyons, which apparently have fallen off the target list; wouldn't do for the descent stage to bash into a canyon wall & blow up too close to MSL...
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 08:13 PM
Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2511 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Here's one for you Mike - I get bayer filters - and I get the normal way of doing filtered obs. How do you set up a CCD to do single shot colour but ALSO do filtered obs as well? Is it like a hybrid bayer filter that has an R, a B but only one G with what would be the 'other' G as a clear for use with filters? (That's a complete and utter guess) That might work well, but we use an off-the-shelf sensor so we can't have a custom filter. No, the narrowband filters work because the Bayer filters are transparent in the near-IR, where the narrowband color can be used to look for iron-bearing minerals. In the visible, there is always some overlap between the narrowband filter and at least one of the three Bayer filters, often two. In those cases we just adjust the interpolation appropriately to use only the pixels that have usable signal after light has passed through both the Bayer and narrowband filters. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Jun 2 2007, 08:49 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Ahh - suddenly it all becomes clear(er) - cheers Mike
Doug |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 06:22 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |