JWST and Exoplanet Atmospheres |
![]() ![]() |
JWST and Exoplanet Atmospheres |
![]()
Post
#31
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 ![]() |
Further analysis of the TRAPPIST-1 b observations offer stronger constraints on any possible atmosphere, ruling out even a Mars-like atmosphere.
As far as surface conditions go, it appears that the closest solar system analogue to TRAPPIST-1 b, despite its larger-than-Earth size, is Mercury. It will be interesting to see what Cycle 1 observations may have revealed about the other six planets in the system. https://astrobiology.com/2023/05/constraini...bservation.html |
|
|
![]()
Post
#32
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 ![]() |
The scorecard for TRAPPIST-1 is now Vacuums 2, Atmospheres 0. (At least substantial atmospheres.)
JWST observations for TRAPPIST-1 c's dayside is consistent with being quite a bit like the Moon, though a thin atmosphere hasn't been ruled out. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06232-z I'm not sure which planet in the system we'll learn about next – the observation programs and methodologies vary – but this is sure playing out in interesting fashion, like a serialized drama. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#33
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 ![]() |
This paper about LHS 475b almost certainly lends a clue as to why there have been JWST observations of several exoplanets that haven't yet led to publications summarizing those results: It's often going to be hard to reach specific conclusions, as the abstract explains, because of "the nature of the planet itself, rather than instrumental limits."
While the paper calls this planet "warm," it has an equilibrium temperature well above that of Mercury or Trappist-1b. This continues the streak that for terrestrial planets so hot, we have yet to confirm any atmosphere for any other them. In this case, however, no atmosphere has been ruled out. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-02064-z |
|
|
![]()
Post
#34
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 104 Joined: 3-February 20 From: Paris (France) Member No.: 8747 ![]() |
Bonjour,
Interesting detection of atmospheric gases of a sub-Neptune in habitable zone. With a potential presence of Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) to be confirmed... https://www.nasa.gov/goddard/2023/webb-disc...phere-of-k2-18b |
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 104 Joined: 3-February 20 From: Paris (France) Member No.: 8747 ![]() |
Bonjour,
Webb Detects Tiny Quartz Crystals in the Clouds of a Hot Gas Giant https://www.nasa.gov/missions/webb/webb-det...-hot-gas-giant/ |
|
|
![]()
Post
#36
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 ![]() |
There is the parable about someone looking for their lost keys under the light of streetlamps not because that is most likely where the keys were lost but because that's where light makes the search more feasible. In the current era of exoplanet characterization, planets that are large, hot, and/or close to their stars (and, of course, transiting) are not the only types of planet, and not the types we're most interested in, but they are the ones where JWST's capabilities make it possible to characterize them. It's fascinating, but also tantalizing as the candidate earthlike and habitable zone planets out there elude us for now.
I hope that, eg, Proxima b and the Tau Ceti planets lend themselves to characterization in the coming years, but it's clearly going to be a difficult challenge. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#37
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 104 Joined: 3-February 20 From: Paris (France) Member No.: 8747 ![]() |
Bonjour,
NASA’s Webb Identifies Methane In an Exoplanet’s Atmosphere, https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2023/11/22/nasa...ets-atmosphere/ |
|
|
![]()
Post
#38
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 ![]() |
It's interesting that methane has been elusive in exoplanet atmospheres studied so far. I suppose that this is because most exoplanets with atmospheres studied so far have been hot ones, causing photodissociation to occur at a high rate. I think that we'll be seeing a lot more characterization of "warm" exoplanets soon.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#39
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 ![]() |
Another case of JWST finding that a hot terrestrial exoplanet shows no signs of a significant atmosphere. Probably not much of a surprise in this case, as the high density indicates not even a lot of silicates, much less volatiles.
https://astrobiology.com/2024/01/gj-367b-is...-sub-earth.html |
|
|
![]()
Post
#40
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 ![]() |
It's been hard to find atmospheres surrounding terrestrial exoplanets. This is (depending upon definitions) the first.
https://science.nasa.gov/missions/webb/nasa...ocky-exoplanet/ |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th June 2024 - 06:44 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |