Home, Sweet Home, Dream becomes Reality |
Home, Sweet Home, Dream becomes Reality |
Feb 8 2006, 07:07 PM
Post
#76
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 877 Joined: 7-March 05 From: Switzerland Member No.: 186 |
QUOTE (dvandorn @ Feb 8 2006, 05:29 PM) I keep thinking in terms of artesian springs. I've seen a number of them on Earth, and especially those which vent volcanically heated water tend to bear water that's absolutely saturated with minerals. The "throw" distance from the source of the spring makes an obvious difference in the lithologies of the rock that's deposited by the flowing spring water. -the other Doug If it's such a former spring, would you expect any sign of it on Home Plate where the "water" came out. -------------------- |
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 07:22 PM
Post
#77
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1636 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Lima, Peru Member No.: 385 |
QUOTE (Tman @ Feb 8 2006, 02:07 PM) If it's such a former spring, would you expect any sign of it on Home Plate where the "water" came out. In order to probe it (spring), then around the HP must have at least a hole where comes out the hot water. Sure it must be buried due to billions years of sand and dust deposition. Rodolfo |
|
|
Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
Feb 8 2006, 07:34 PM
Post
#78
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 07:41 PM
Post
#79
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
Setting aside PM for now (we need to see it closer up), wouldn't we see plentiful evidence right in front of us indicative of a "spring" origin? I mean rounded edges, flow channels etc. (I'm not really familiar with worn remnants of springs)? Can anybody point that sort of thing out, as distinct from eolian erosion forms? Is there any reason to doubt that these layers originally ran continuously across this whole exposure?
-------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 08:13 PM
Post
#80
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 |
I think we're looking at strata that has been tilted through meteorite impact. The stereo images below show the bedding planes to be dipping inward at an apparent angle of at least 20 degrees, best seen in the more erosion resistant layers sticking up above the outcrop in the top right. That implies these rocks were present before the meteorite impact.
The fine laminations are not inconsistant with wind deposition and, in fact, where cross-bedding is visible, it is planar stratified, displaying none of the festoon laminations associated with flowing water. So my guess is that these are wind derived sediments. And that is also what the layering at Burns Hill is interpreted as. I think that's about all we can say for now until we get some geochemistry data. Left: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...00P2364L7M1.JPG Right: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...00P2364R1M1.JPG -------------------- |
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 08:58 PM
Post
#81
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 30-March 05 Member No.: 223 |
Here is a color-stitch of the great Sol 746 navcam-series:
BTW.: is it just me or has anyone else noticed the slightly "blurred" quality of the recent Navcam frames (despite the now more clearer winter sky ... ?) esp. compared to last mars-year's crisp & clear navcam around the same time in the season ? |
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 08:58 PM
Post
#82
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
QUOTE (aldo12xu @ Feb 8 2006, 03:13 PM) I think we're looking at strata that has been tilted through meteorite impact. The stereo images below show the bedding planes to be dipping inward at an apparent angle of at least 20 degrees, best seen in the more erosion resistant layers sticking up above the outcrop in the top right. That implies these rocks were present before the meteorite impact. I thought the area Spirit landed in was covered in basalt, indicating volcanic activity. Of course who is to say it could not be a combination of both impacts and volcanoes? -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 08:58 PM
Post
#83
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
Now _that's_ what we like to see!
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/fo...55P1206R0M1.JPG My uneducated intuition makes me think the lower, thicker layers, which seem to have large grains (small pebbles?) embedded in them, are composed of volcanic ash rather than windblown (or water-washed) fine sediments. Of course intuition is reliably wrong... Question to the geologists: does rock formed from volcanic ash appear any different (to the instruments on Spirit) if the ash fell onto standing water, or onto dry land? Hmm, and I suppose if we imagine that there are repeated episodes of ash fall and periods under water, it will make a difference if the sediments between the water and the ash are water permeable? Clearly there's SOMETHING different between the lower, coarse layers and the higher fine layers. What else might it be? (this is a real question, not a rhetorical.) -------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 10:54 PM
Post
#84
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 |
QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Feb 8 2006, 08:58 PM) The Columbia Hills are older than the basaltic flows covering most of Gusev Crater. Some of the rocks within Columbia Hills are interpreted to be clastic (eg. Peace may be a basaltic sandstone) and pyroclastic (eg. Wishtone may be a tuff) in origin. These may represent the basement rocks that were present before the Gusev impact event. With the impact event, these basement rocks were thrown up, tilted and broken up, creating brecciated rocks like Voltaire. All these units were subsequently cut by dikes, represented by basaltic rocks like Backstay and Cherry Bomb. The plains basalts on which Spirit touched down were emplaced some time later. Hope that helps --Aldo-- -------------------- |
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 11:03 PM
Post
#85
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
QUOTE (imipak @ Feb 8 2006, 10:58 AM) Now _that's_ what we like to see! http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/fo...55P1206R0M1.JPG My uneducated intuition makes me think the lower, thicker layers, which seem to have large grains (small pebbles?) embedded in them, are composed of volcanic ash rather than windblown (or water-washed) fine sediments. Of course intuition is reliably wrong... Question to the geologists: does rock formed from volcanic ash appear any different (to the instruments on Spirit) if the ash fell onto standing water, or onto dry land? Hmm, and I suppose if we imagine that there are repeated episodes of ash fall and periods under water, it will make a difference if the sediments between the water and the ash are water permeable? Clearly there's SOMETHING different between the lower, coarse layers and the higher fine layers. What else might it be? (this is a real question, not a rhetorical.) Aha! But here it is! http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/mi...55P2936M2M1.JPG And what , pray tell, is it? If it's sandstone, I don't see any grains . If it's scoria, I don't see any gas spaces . If threatened with torture, if I don't talk, I would quote a Past Maestro of Home Plate" It's deja vu all over again! It's the kind of fabric Oppy has been sinking her abrasive into all over Meridiani! Smooth-lumpy STUFF! But a geologist would phrase it more ...esoterically. -------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 11:26 PM
Post
#86
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
|
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 11:39 PM
Post
#87
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
QUOTE (Shaka @ Feb 8 2006, 11:03 PM) Aha! But here it is! http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/mi...55P2936M2M1.JPG And what , pray tell, is it? If it's sandstone, I don't see any grains . If it's scoria, I don't see any gas spaces . "Well... it's rock, isn't it?" /Arthur Dent Actually the blueberry-esque concave dimples in the lower, whitish (in that image) material has brought the word 'slots' floating up from some dusty recess of the distant past, 18 months or more ago. And really the darker, upper material *does* seem (to me) to be made up of sand-grains sized particles. As it happens there's an outside wall made of very soft grey-green sandstone about three feet <-- that way from my monitor that looks very like the farker material. it feels sandy if you rub your thumb over it, and there's a small heap of sand grains that have eroded out of it accumulating in tiny wind traps in the corners of wall and ground. It's a terrible building material - it weathers so fast that old older buildings in the area, there's a characteristic 'gumline' vertical profile - sort of a ' UUUUU ' shape, rotated through 90 degrees - where the mortar holding the wall together has withstood wind erosion more strongly than the building stone itself. Co-incidentally it looks a bit like the harder, then layers standing up proud of the adjacent layers, especially in the coarser-grained , thicker layers. Anyway... I'm still boggling over the image of Homeplate being flipped over like a pancake by an impact event -------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
Feb 9 2006, 01:47 AM
Post
#88
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (Shaka @ Feb 8 2006, 05:03 PM) Aha! But here it is! http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/mi...55P2936M2M1.JPG And what , pray tell, is it? If it's sandstone, I don't see any grains . If it's scoria, I don't see any gas spaces . ... I know I'm probably not seeing what I think I'm seeing. But it looks a little like limestone to me. It's got this flat-smooth-plates look to it that reminds me of limestone emplaced in hot springs. I'm probably wrong, but it's a lovely image... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Feb 9 2006, 02:11 AM
Post
#89
|
||
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
I haven't seen these two Pancam ESF's stitched together here yet.
It will be in full filter colour as soon as the data is down. CODE 746 p2364.15 26 26 0 0 2 54 pancam_barnhill_2cx1r_L234567Rall James -------------------- |
|
|
||
Feb 9 2006, 02:14 AM
Post
#90
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 166 Joined: 20-September 05 From: North Texas Member No.: 503 |
QUOTE (dvandorn @ Feb 9 2006, 01:47 AM) I know I'm probably not seeing what I think I'm seeing. But it looks a little like limestone to me. It's got this flat-smooth-plates look to it that reminds me of limestone emplaced in hot springs. I'm probably wrong, but it's a lovely image... -the other Doug Yes, similar to what you see at Mammoth Hot Springs in Yellowstone National Park. But deposits like that don't necessarily require *hot* springs; just a source of water with a high mineral content. I have seen lots of flowstone in caves with a similar look. And those are all cold water deposits. Now I am not suggesting that there was a cave involved. But cold water with lots of dissolved minerals would evaporate very quickly in the thin Martian atmosphere. And the fine-grained mineral deposits should build up steadily. Any sort of mineral spring, hot or cold, should be able to do the job. David |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 12:02 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |