IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

June 12 2007 Icy Moons (rev 46)
alan
post Jun 6 2007, 07:35 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Rev 46 description available at CICLOPS

http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=3245

Some highlights:

Cassini will observe Mimas, the innermost of the mid-sized icy satellites of Saturn

June 12, Cassini makes one of its closest passes of the small, inner satellite Atlas, at a distance of only 38,000 km (24,000 mi). With an average diameter of only 31 km (19 mi), Atlas is one of the smallest moons of Saturn. Atlas will only appear to be 120 pixels across (at the equator). However, these images may still provide important clues about the formation of one of the most distinguishing aspects of the tiny satellite: its equatorial bulge. The bulge is thought to have been created by material from Saturn’s A ring being deposited preferentially along the equator of the satellite.

A number of observations are dedicated to observing some of Saturn's small moons, in order to refine scientists' estimates of their orbital paths. These sequences include observations of some of Saturn's outer satellites, such as Paaliaq, Hati, and S/2004 S13

I've seen a few of these small outer moons listed recently on the raw image page. They search tool only shows them from the last few orbits. Is this something new they are doing or have they been previously listed as Sky?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 14)
jasedm
post Jun 7 2007, 07:01 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



I think it's a recent decision to attempt to pin down the orbital dynamics of some of the newly discovered moons. To my knowledge the mission so far hasn't included any observations of these captured rocks. But out at apoapsis, it strikes me as a good use of the spacecraft's time.
It's a shame no observations are planned on this orbit of Prometheus - the only named moon so far not imaged appreciably better than Voyager managed. I believe the spacecraft comes within 65,000km of Prometheus on June 12th - evidently better opportunities are available later on (including a sub 50,000km pass on June 28th this year).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jun 7 2007, 07:13 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3230
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Sorry, no dice AFAIK for Prometheus. The June 12 encounter unfortunately occurs at the same time as the Atlas encounter, and the Rocks/Rings folks chose to image Atlas. The June 28 encounter occurs a very high phase angle. Can't check to see if observations are still planned, but at C/A, you would only see a thin crescent.

EDIT: LOL, I found another good reason why there is no imaging during June 12 encounter: Prometheus is in eclipse at the time. wink.gif


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Jun 7 2007, 08:09 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



Right decision I think to go for Atlas on this orbit VP, if that was the choice. There's only one closer pass to Atlas (including the EM), but many more opportunities for imaging Prometheus close up and at a decent phase angle.
Must be a difficult job being a mission planner sometimes!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Jun 13 2007, 09:19 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Some distant looks at Mimas. http://saturn1.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/ima...0&storedQ=0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jun 13 2007, 09:36 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Atlas images are in. It doesn't look very saucer-shaped in this geometry.

http://saturn1.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/ima...iImageID=113545

Pretty noisy, too.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarcF
post Jun 13 2007, 10:07 AM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 241
Joined: 16-May 06
From: Geneva, Switzerland
Member No.: 773



Amazing !!
The surface is so smooth. Only few craters might be seen near the terminator.
It seems completely covered by "ring snow".
And where is the equatorial ridge ?
Marc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jun 13 2007, 10:46 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (MarcF @ Jun 13 2007, 11:07 AM) *
And where is the equatorial ridge ?


Presumably around the perimeter of that image.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pat
post Jun 13 2007, 12:16 PM
Post #9


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 19-October 05
Member No.: 532



QUOTE (alan @ Jun 6 2007, 08:35 AM) *
...A number of observations are dedicated to observing some of Saturn's small moons, in order to refine scientists' estimates of their orbital paths. These sequences include observations of some of Saturn's outer satellites, such as Paaliaq, Hati, and S/2004 S13

I've seen a few of these small outer moons listed recently on the raw image page. They search tool only shows them from the last few orbits. Is this something new they are doing or have they been previously listed as Sky?


The outer irregulars have been imaged before and yes the target was listed as 'SKY' meaning that the target was a RA/dec coordinate. One of the German group on the Imaging Team has recently begun observing the outer irregulars to get photometry, rotation curves etc and the observation designs for these are specifically targetted to the satellite of interest hence the name appearing as the target. I think that the Cassini observation design software may have only recently been updated to accept the outer irregulars by name as valid targets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pat
post Jun 13 2007, 12:26 PM
Post #10


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 19-October 05
Member No.: 532



QUOTE (ngunn @ Jun 13 2007, 11:46 AM) *
Presumably around the perimeter of that image.


Looking at these images it may be that it isn't an equatorial ridge at all but that Atlas is pear shaped with bulges at the equator at roughly the sub-Saturn point and 180 degrees from the sub-Saturn point (anti-Saturn point?). The geometry in the latest images has us looking almost straight 'down' onto the 'bulge' facing away from Saturn. It reminds me of satellite imagery looking down on a mountain. Possibly the 'bulge' is cone shaped.

So maybe Atlas is roughly spherical with two large cones stuck on pointing towards and away from Saturn.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jun 13 2007, 03:06 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3230
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



We are looking down on the southern hemisphere of Atlas. The equatorial bulge is the smooth periphery of the image. The south pole is within the rougher bump seen at the center of the disk.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pat
post Jun 13 2007, 03:33 PM
Post #12


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 19-October 05
Member No.: 532



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jun 13 2007, 04:06 PM) *
We are looking down on the southern hemisphere of Atlas. The equatorial bulge is the smooth periphery of the image. The south pole is within the rougher bump seen at the center of the disk.


Yep, I typed before I'd actually done some work on the geometry. Volcanopele is right, we're pretty much looking down on the south pole so the images are entirely consistent with an equatorial bulge of newer, smoother material ontop an older more eroded ellipsoid. The 'saucer' is back and the 'lemon' out the window. Ah well, it was nice while it lasted.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarcF
post Jun 13 2007, 03:37 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 241
Joined: 16-May 06
From: Geneva, Switzerland
Member No.: 773



OK, thanks. Now I see the perspective.
We can imagine that the actual moon corresponds to the rough core, and the smooth belt to catched ring particules.
Marc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ian R
post Jun 13 2007, 04:09 PM
Post #14


Lord Of The Uranian Rings
***

Group: Members
Posts: 798
Joined: 18-July 05
From: Plymouth, UK
Member No.: 437



Here's a version of the picture created from several stacked images. The noise has been removed from each indivdual layer:

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jun 13 2007, 04:41 PM
Post #15


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Why is there so much noise in the images -- is it just because we're real close to Saturn and there's lots of charged particles flying around?

I checked the tour page and it appears that periapsis this time around was at 2.7 Saturn radii. We haven't been this close to Saturn since Rev 14 (there was a nice Pandora flyby then, and I note those images were also noisy).

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 10:22 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.