Interesting Titan stuff at the upcoming DPS meeting |
Interesting Titan stuff at the upcoming DPS meeting |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 ![]() |
This writeup by Bruce Moomaw was shamelessly copied from the Cassini-Huygens Yahoo group. I hope noone objects (John Sheff ?) posting it here as well because it contains some very interesting new bits of info.
----- In addition to the really fascinating- looking new information that will be released at the upcoming DPS meeting ( http://adams.dm.unipi.it/~dps06/ ) on Titan surface composition data from Cassini's VIMS, there are several interesting- looking abstracts on its radar data: (1) Karl Mitchell and Charles Wood have two talks at the "Titan Surface 2" session on Thursday on the north polar lakes found on the T16 flyby, suggesting that many (though not all) of them are inside cryovolcanic calderas. "The concentration of dozens of possible caldera volcanoes in this northern region of Titan suggests the existence of an extensive hot spot region of heat loss. This differs from the other 8% of Titan so far imaged by radar, where volcanic features are infrequent and relatively isolated." And: "If volcanic and lacustrine environments are concurrent, then geothermal systems rich in organic materials may provide suitable conditions for the emergence of life." (2) In the same session, Randoph Kirk reviews the T13 radar mapping of Xanadu: "Morphologically, Xanadu is populated with ubiquitous, closely spaced hills ~5 km across, which locally form chains and appear to be dissected by numerous channels and low areas filled by radar-dark sediments. Radarclinometry indicates typical hills are at least 500 m high, but the results are asymmetric, strongly suggesting that the foreshortened bright slopes are unresolved. If so, the hills are ~1000 m high with 30 degree slopes. In either case Xanadu contrasts strongly with the rest of Titan, where topographic features are rare and mostly <300 m high... We therefore hypothesize that Xanadu was formed by an initial period of compressive tectonism and cryovolcanism that triggered the erosion that sculpted the rugged surface." Sounds less like Mars' Tharsis bulge than I previously thought, and more like Venus' Ishtar Terra -- commonly thought to be a patch of surface crust shoved together by a local convergence of underlying mantle convection currents (like scum wrinkling up together above the drain on an emptying bathtub. But that would still mean that it's higher-altitude now than the rest of Titan's surface. (3) According to Essam Marouf (in Wednesday's "Titan Atmosphere 4" session), Cassini's radio occultations during its T14 flyby last May showed clear specular radio reflections off its surface: "The echo appears consistent with reflection from localized hydrocarbon liquid regions embedded in mostly nonspecularly reflecting terrain." No description from the abstract, though, of just what parts of Titan's surface were covered by this study. (4) Back at the "Titan Surface 2" sesssion, Jani Radebaugh summarizes the conventional conclusions regarding Titan's huge networks of longitudinal dunes, including the idea that they have heights of about 100 meters. But in a "Titan Surface 3" poster the same day, Flora Paganelli presents an alternative appraisal of Cassini's dune observations which is a real eyebrow-raiser. To wit: Before the T16 flyby, all of Cassini's dune-detecting radar flybys had involved the craft flying over Titan's surface roughly parallel to the dunes' long axes -- that is, with its SAR radar beam (which slants off to one side of the craft) perpendicular to the dunes' long axes, so that it was assumed that the "light" parallel streaks in the images were from that side of each dune that tilted toward Cassini and thus reflected back a brighter radar echo, while the "dark streaks" were the opposite sides of the dunes that tilted away from Cassini and its radar beam. But during the T16 flyby, for the first time it flew roughly perpendicular to the dunes' long axes -- and damned if the light and dark streaks didn't show up on the radar with just as much clarity as during the previous dune observations. This raises the serious possibility that the "dunes" aren't really dunes at all, with surface slopes -- but instead "might be superposed streaks with none or minimal topography, and that they are visible because of differential erosion between the radar-bright rougher substrate and the radar dark of fine-particle smooth surface deposits." In short, Titan still retains its ability to keep totally surprising us. (5) No less than three entirely new, and very promising, new techniques have been developed to utilize Cassini's radar for Titan surface mapping in ways it wasn't originally designed for -- all of them described in "Titan Surface 3" posters. First, Richard West and Ralph Lorenz discuss the new "High-SAR" technique in which the radar's scatterometer data is acquired and processed in new ways to generate genuine and very useful SAR images at far greater distances from Titan than in its standard SAR mode (albeit, of course, at lower resolution). So far it's been used at distances ranging from 11,000 to fully 37,000 km from Titan, with resulting resolutions varying from 1.5 to 5 km. (The closest of these observations was a second SAR inspection of Huygens' landing site.) Second, Lauren Wye describes another way to utilize the radar's scatterometer data for imaging at 15-km resolution over far bigger areas than the High-SAR mode (and even obtaining some data on surface characteristics that neither regular nor High SAR can achieve). Finally, Bryan Stiles describes how very precise monitoring of Cassini's position and attitude allow the center of its SAR swath to be used for radar altimetry, albeit at lower resolution (50 km horizontal and 200 meters vertical) than the nadir-pointing altimetry for which the system was originally designed. Sine the latter type of altimetry can't be done at the same time that a region is SAR-mapped, and since it's become crystal clear that altitude maps of surface features are absolutely crucial to make any sense out of Titan, this is very important indeed. But then, given the extraordinary complexity and continuing mystery of the place, this is true of any new Titan study technique at all. -------------------- |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd June 2024 - 02:06 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |