IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
InSight EDL, 26 Nov 2018
climber
post Nov 26 2018, 11:30 PM
Post #76


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Nov 26 2018, 11:33 PM) *
Veronica and Emily both look like they've gotten younger in the 5 or 6 years since I last saw either of them.

Probably the same for you Dan, you’ve been kind of hibernating...?
wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Nov 26 2018, 11:39 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (climber @ Nov 26 2018, 03:30 PM) *
Probably the same for you Dan, you’ve been kind of hibernating...?
wink.gif

No. I'm more bald and I grew a white beard.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam Hurcewicz
post Nov 26 2018, 11:40 PM
Post #78


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 102
Joined: 29-January 10
From: Poland
Member No.: 5205



If landing site are match that image could be fine.
This is small version, I have also BIG 12000 x 8000 px

Attached Image



check MRO/HIRISE DTM for that area:
https://www.uahirise.org/dtm/dtm.php?ID=ESP_038449_1845


--------------------
Adam Hurcewicz from Poland
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Nov 27 2018, 12:00 AM
Post #79


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Possible meteorite? Pure speculation at this point. Congrats to the engineers!

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roby72
post Nov 27 2018, 12:09 AM
Post #80


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 121
Joined: 26-June 04
From: Austria
Member No.: 89



A reminder how the Hazcam of Curiosity looks before the dusty dust cover comes off in 2012:

https://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/pr...AUT_04096M_.JPG

and after it comes off:

https://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/pr...AUT_04096M_.JPG

It seems that on Curiosity the dust slips also beyond the cover a little..but its just a guess what we might see in a few hours from the cover free Insight camera (in color!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Nov 27 2018, 12:24 AM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



120 degrees de-fisheyed version, and an attempt to improve contrast of the environment behind the dust cover:
Attached Image


Out-of-the-hip, I didn't find a good technique to remove the patches on the dust cover, so I enhanced the contrast in the background, instead.
There is also a saturation and brightnes gradient, which I didn't try to remove.

The lander seems to be slightly tilted. Might be, that one of the feet is standing on top of a small rock like the one in the foreground.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Nov 27 2018, 12:55 AM
Post #82


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (Gerald @ Nov 27 2018, 01:24 AM) *
...The lander seems to be slightly tilted. Might be, that one of the feet is standing on top of a small rock like the one in the foreground...


They said on the post landing conference the tilt was less than 2 degrees.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Nov 27 2018, 01:23 AM
Post #83


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Can we compare Marco’s image definition to Mariner 4’s? Distance to Mars, FOV, etc...?
It seams to me that we can see some features...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 27 2018, 01:31 AM
Post #84


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



The expected time for an orbiter downlink (looks like MODY) is approaching. Suggest following Emily's updated article here; if anyone gets a scoop, it'll be her. smile.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Nov 27 2018, 01:38 AM
Post #85


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (nprev @ Nov 27 2018, 02:31 AM) *
The expected time for an orbiter downlink (looks like MODY) is approaching. Suggest following Emily's updated article here; if anyone gets a scoop, it'll be her. smile.gif



I am watching DSN Now like a hawk, lol.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 27 2018, 01:40 AM
Post #86


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Yeah, but remember the same caution as the Oppy recovery efforts...it's not an authoritative indicator of anything, really. wink.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dmg
post Nov 27 2018, 02:03 AM
Post #87


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 12-June 07
Member No.: 2392



I understand the caution about DSN Now in terms of the variable "positive predictive value" of it appearing to be communicating with a certain spacecraft. What is the "negative predictive value" of it showing a prolonged (i.e. in this case >25 min) NO communication through any antenna with a given spacecraft at a time that comm. was expected?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 27 2018, 02:06 AM
Post #88


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



No idea. All I know is that the real word on anything's gotta come from NASA/JPL. smile.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
xflare
post Nov 27 2018, 02:15 AM
Post #89


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 282
Joined: 18-June 04
Member No.: 84



QUOTE (dmg @ Nov 27 2018, 03:03 AM) *
I understand the caution about DSN Now in terms of the variable "positive predictive value" of it appearing to be communicating with a certain spacecraft. What is the "negative predictive value" of it showing a prolonged (i.e. in this case >25 min) NO communication through any antenna with a given spacecraft at a time that comm. was expected?


I dont think the DSN Now site showed any downlink from the Parker Solar Probe in the hour or so after it was launched
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dmg
post Nov 27 2018, 02:18 AM
Post #90


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 12-June 07
Member No.: 2392



Yes but in this case the expected comm pass was with mars odyssey which would transmit from what it got from insight. Anyway nothing to do but wait and see
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 09:37 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.