IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Mars magnetism
alan
post May 3 2018, 07:25 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1847
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Mars crustal magnetism as measured by Mars global Surveyor:


Attached Image


I noticed the resemblance of parts of it to satellite tracks, but they are somewhat off center.

So I tried NASA's GISS map projector, and playing a hunch used the antipodes of the Borealis Basin as the center:


Attached Image


Has anyone read anything explaining why the curves they make should be roughly centered at the basin's antipodes?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post May 3 2018, 07:55 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1805
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakda.../2008/1710.html


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post May 8 2018, 05:50 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 768
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Alternatively Sprenke and Baker provided a reasonably compelling explanation, taking into account true polar wander. The full paper can be found at Icarus Volume 147 Issue 1 (September 2000). Behind a paywall but a comprehensive abstract is here:

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2000/pdf/1930.pdf
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ectoterrestrial
post Dec 1 2018, 12:26 AM
Post #4


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 688



QUOTE (alan @ May 3 2018, 12:25 PM) *
Mars crustal magnetism as measured by Mars global Surveyor:


Attached Image


I noticed the resemblance of parts of it to satellite tracks, but they are somewhat off center.

So I tried NASA's GISS map projector, and playing a hunch used the antipodes of the Borealis Basin as the center:


Attached Image


Has anyone read anything explaining why the curves they make should be roughly centered at the basin's antipodes?


You don't need a single hemisphere dynamo to form the crustal magnetic remnant.

-Start with a magnetized crust from a standard dynamo dipole.
-The Argyre and Hellas impacts shock demagnetize their respective hexants.
-The Borealis impact obliterates the now northern crust.
-Global relaxation of from the Borealis impact causes E-W aligned crustal fractures.
-These fractures of the crustal "magnets" give the observed linear pattern.


--------------------
UMSF Newbie since 2006.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Dec 2 2018, 11:45 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 768
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Assuming that early Mars reflected Earth with a molten core dynamo, albeit smaller, then the magnetic stripes of alternating polarity seem to indicate reversals of the magnetic field combined with either plate tectonics, true polar wander or perhaps a combination of both. The dynamo shut down in the first billion years, possibly due to cooling and the residual, induced fields have been disrupted due to both large impact events and heating due to volcanic activity. It is a pity that we cannot measure the depth of the residual crustal magnetic field as this, combined with the results of Insights thermal determinations could allow us to pin down when the dynamo shut down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ectoterrestrial
post Dec 3 2018, 06:48 AM
Post #6


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 688



QUOTE (serpens @ Dec 2 2018, 04:45 PM) *
Assuming that early Mars reflected Earth with a molten core dynamo, albeit smaller, then the magnetic stripes of alternating polarity seem to indicate reversals of the magnetic field combined with either plate tectonics, true polar wander or perhaps a combination of both. The dynamo shut down in the first billion years, possibly due to cooling and the residual, induced fields have been disrupted due to both large impact events and heating due to volcanic activity. It is a pity that we cannot measure the depth of the residual crustal magnetic field as this, combined with the results of Insights thermal determinations could allow us to pin down when the dynamo shut down.


I remember photocopying the Icarus paper you mention in 2000. Its a neat idea but it was also a very early guess after the 1999 MGS-MAG data came out.

Look at the relationship between the impact basins and the surviving magnetic region. It's all you need. Continental drift is unnecessary in this case.

Some ground truth in this matter would make a huge difference.


--------------------
UMSF Newbie since 2006.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th December 2018 - 11:58 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.