IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Juno Perijove 55, October 15, 2023
Brian Swift
post Oct 16 2023, 11:50 PM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



Looks like there is also a different plume that shows up in images 33 to 36.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 17 2023, 12:47 AM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Yep, Zamama is still active.

Nope, It's Volund!


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 17 2023, 06:27 AM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



9 images complete.

Attached Image


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Oct 17 2023, 03:02 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



PJ55 Io Initial downlink images overview, normal-ish color/contrast
Attached Image

Full resolution PNG at https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing?id=15605
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 17 2023, 08:19 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Attached Image


Final montage of 15 images. There are 4 others, 2 at the start and end but their resolution is much lower and don't really add much to the coverage.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Oct 18 2023, 04:06 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



I'm thinking back to the time about 15 years ago when the informed expectation for images of Io was about 9 pixels for the entire image. cool.gif

Of course no one back then was anticipating the trajectory modifications required by the longer orbit and extended mission timeline.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Oct 18 2023, 05:03 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



QUOTE (Tom Tamlyn @ Oct 18 2023, 12:06 PM) *
I'm thinking back to the time about 15 years ago when the informed expectation for images of Io was about 9 pixels for the entire image. cool.gif

Of course no one back then was anticipating the trajectory modifications required by the longer orbit and extended mission timeline.



Makes me wonder if orbit insertion error helped these flybys happen?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Oct 18 2023, 08:23 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



The original trajectory would have flown through the radiation belts much more often. How much instruments would have degraded by now is hard to say (but it's definitely serendipitous!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StargazeInWonder
post Oct 18 2023, 09:34 PM
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 228
Joined: 14-January 22
Member No.: 9140



Funny, because the success of this flyby led me to muse over an impractical hypothetical scenario where the Galileo Orbiter, in response to its antenna issues, was put into a "parking" orbit with minimal radiation belt flybys until a relay orbiter could be flown out to join it and let the mission resume with the combination of Galileo's instruments and high-throughput data transfer. I'm sure that that would have been wildly impractical, but this phase of Juno's mission has just a touch of the spirit of that. We now have the data throughput asset that Galileo lacked.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Oct 18 2023, 09:39 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Explorer1 @ Oct 18 2023, 01:23 PM) *
The original trajectory would have flown through the radiation belts much more often.

But it would have taken data much more frequently near Jupiter, so even though the mission has been a lot longer, the amount of science data is more or less the same. Satellite encounters notwithstanding.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 20 2023, 09:51 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Attached Image


Global map using images from PJ55


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Oct 24 2023, 11:50 PM
Post #27


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



My version of the PJ55_29 image:

Attached Image


As mentioned in previous posts, a volcanic plume is visible near the limb at lower right in the PJ55_29 image. Here its brightness has been greatly exaggerated relative to other parts of the image.
North is up and this image is enlarged by a factor of 3 relative to the original, raw data.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 25 2023, 01:06 AM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



That plume is Prometheus, also seen on PJ53.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 11:12 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.