IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Tau Chart, Comparing both rovers
djellison
post Jun 30 2006, 03:10 PM
Post #1


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I visited this data early on, but there's 600+ sols worth now, so I've revisited it

I thought it would be interesting to comapre Tau values form both rovers at the same time - so to that end I added 21 to the sol number of each Opportunity tau observation to bring it in to line, within a sol, of Spirit observations.

What does it show? (remember to subtract 21 to get ACTUAL Opportunity Sol numbers)

Well - both rovers experience a large increase from around Sol 350-370, but for Opportunity it peaked briefly significantly higher. Spirit experienced two local events, 380 and 420, Opportunity a long, small peak around 450 and another, shorter one at 480, and the share the big spike at 510ish.

Interesting stuff anyway - when you match them up, time wise ( i.e. +21 on MERB sol numbers ) they match quite closely.

Doug
Attached File(s)
Attached File  MER_tau.pdf ( 369.71K ) Number of downloads: 549
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marz
post Jun 30 2006, 03:17 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482



QUOTE (djellison @ Jun 30 2006, 10:10 AM) *
I visited this data early on, but there's 600+ sols worth now, so I've revisited it

I thought it would be interesting to comapre Tau values form both rovers at the same time - so to that end I added 21 to the sol number of each Opportunity tau observation to bring it in to line, within a sol, of Spirit observations.

What does it show? (remember to subtract 21 to get ACTUAL Opportunity Sol numbers)

Well - both rovers experience a large increase from around Sol 350-370, but for Opportunity it peaked briefly significantly higher. Spirit experienced two local events, 380 and 420, Opportunity a long, small peak around 450 and another, shorter one at 480, and the share the big spike at 510ish.

Interesting stuff anyway - when you match them up, time wise ( i.e. +21 on MERB sol numbers ) they match quite closely.

Doug


Nice chart: weird how Tau always increases as a huge spike that then levels off. I guess dust only is replenished back up into the high levels of the atmosphere during storm-like events, so a sudden burst of dust hits a site all at once and then tapers off slowly as the dust settles out?

Do we have about another 100 Sols before the next storm season begins?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Jun 30 2006, 07:57 PM
Post #3


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



sorry for my ignorance- tau=optical depth?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 30 2006, 08:19 PM
Post #4


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I'm not sure of the actual units, but a high number is murkier, dustier air.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Jun 30 2006, 08:45 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



The Tau chart would be much nice if the x-axis is labeled as Summer, Winter, Fall or Spring Southern Hemisphere so that I can correlate better the periodicity of Tau among the sessons: Winter: Low Tau (clear time with index lower than 1.0) and Summer: High Tau (if the index is above than 3.0, the sky is murky due to the increased winds and DD).

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Jun 30 2006, 11:39 PM
Post #6


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (remcook @ Jun 30 2006, 08:57 PM) *
sorry for my ignorance- tau=optical depth?

Yep Tau is optical depth. Direct insolation is e(-tau)*top of atmosphere insolation. Indirect insolation is a whole other ball of wax. Generally correlates to some degree with atmospheric dust levels on mars. AFAIK it's dimensionless, like a coefficient of friction or drag.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mwolff
post Jul 15 2006, 05:27 PM
Post #7


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 16-January 06
Member No.: 646



QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jun 30 2006, 03:45 PM) *
The Tau chart would be much nice if the x-axis is labeled as Summer, Winter, Fall or Spring Southern Hemisphere so that I can correlate better the periodicity of Tau among the sessons: Winter: Low Tau (clear time with index lower than 1.0) and Summer: High Tau (if the index is above than 3.0, the sky is murky due to the increased winds and DD).



"low tau" would be more like < 0.2-0.3. the "high tau" values mentioned would most likely be associated with a large dust storm. however, tau > 1 is typically considered "high"...for dust. water ice clouds would be another story.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mwolff
post Jul 15 2006, 05:28 PM
Post #8


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 16-January 06
Member No.: 646



QUOTE (helvick @ Jun 30 2006, 06:39 PM) *
Yep Tau is optical depth. Direct insolation is e(-tau)*top of atmosphere insolation. Indirect insolation is a whole other ball of wax. Generally correlates to some degree with atmospheric dust levels on mars. AFAIK it's dimensionless, like a coefficient of friction or drag.




tau is dimensionless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 05:15 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.