IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Herschel Space Observatory, ESA
tedstryk
post May 14 2009, 06:04 PM
Post #46


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4061
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Happy day for space-borne astronomy!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post May 14 2009, 06:40 PM
Post #47





Guests






Indeed Ted, fingers crossed the trip to L2 point goes well... Amazing to see how, from a launch vehicle weighing 777 Tons, about 5.5 Tons will make a great difference for space borne astronomy ohmy.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post May 14 2009, 08:30 PM
Post #48


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1106
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Seattle
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (SFJCody @ May 14 2009, 11:50 AM) *
It's great isn't it! I remember how much jeering there was after the unfortunate failure of the maiden launch carrying Cluster. They're not laughing now!


Well, the schadenfreude probably had more to do with the hubris of putting a payload on the maiden launch, and the spectacular nature of the failure, than it had to do with failure itself being unusual, or with people finding anything to jeer about watching a valuable payload disappear. Yes, it may not have been unprecedented to launch a payload on a first flight, but in hindsight it certainly didn't look prudent. I don't think that people necessarily expected the failures to continue. Fair characterization or not, it sort of would be like Boeing inviting a few VIPs onto the 787's first flight and having it crash. The crash is bad, but having an important payload on it compounded it. I guess it wasn't irreplacable. If it were the US, it'd have been some "spare" huge recon sat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ynyralmaen
post May 14 2009, 09:14 PM
Post #49


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 18-July 05
Member No.: 438



As someone whose research post disappeared in an admittedly very pretty puff of smoke in 1996, I agree that it wasn't very prudent to put Cluster on that particular launcher! One important part of the decision to do so was the very economical price of the launch, but clearly it was a false economy.

It was very galling to discover the very avoidable cause of the loss, and then to take delivery of the returned, dented, mud-covered instruments a few weeks later. Valuable lessons were learnt that will hopefully help prevent anything similar happening again.

Cluster II has of course been a huge success, and is still going strong...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 14 2009, 09:25 PM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (ynyralmaen @ May 14 2009, 11:14 PM) *
I agree that it wasn't very prudent to put Cluster on that particular launcher!

That's hindsight and it's easy to make conclusions now. I'd argue it was as prudent a decision back then as it would be now. The Cluster team had to be aware of the risks involved in the decision to fly on a new and untested vehicle and they still went ahead with it. It doesn't really matter how stupid or avoidable a failure is in retrospect, it's always those unknowns that get you. Hopefully you learn something from your mistakes along the way.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post May 14 2009, 09:42 PM
Post #51


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6501
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Belated congrats to ESA & our European friends on the successful launch! Naturally, I was at the doctor all morning & missed it. mad.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 15 2009, 01:35 PM
Post #52


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/herschelplanck...4SJZVNUF_1.html


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post May 15 2009, 03:37 PM
Post #53


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1106
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Seattle
Member No.: 530



Herschel has a VMC? Full globe images!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 15 2009, 07:23 PM
Post #54


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13269
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I hope ESOC can muscle their way in to get a few VMC images in there during cruise. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hendric
post May 15 2009, 09:53 PM
Post #55


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 709
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



Wouldn't any such pictures of the Earth be blinded by the Sun? I thought Herschel was supposed to go to L2, right? Now, we could get some potentially nice pictures of the moon, but the viewing angle on that camera looked fairly wide.


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Jun 19 2009, 11:57 AM
Post #56


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2149
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



wow...just W-O-W! blink.gif
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEM76A0P0WF_index_0.html


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Jun 19 2009, 12:49 PM
Post #57


Forum Contributor
***

Group: Members
Posts: 906
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Very nice. Big mirrors in space smile.gif.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 10 2009, 10:15 AM
Post #58


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5548
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



.. and we have pictures...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8143447.stm

.. and...

http://herschel.esac.esa.int/FirstLight.shtml

smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thomas Lesinski
post Oct 8 2009, 01:21 PM
Post #59


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 2-October 09
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 4961



Hi !

I've been reading UMSF for some time... and I couldn't resist posting this smile.gif

http://herschel.esac.esa.int/FirstParallelModeImages.shtml

First observations of our Milky Way in SPIRE/PACS parallel mode reveal cold material structures with unprecedented detail.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Oct 18 2009, 05:13 PM
Post #60


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2253
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (Thomas Lesinski @ Oct 8 2009, 01:21 PM) *
First observations of our Milky Way in SPIRE/PACS parallel mode reveal cold material structures with unprecedented detail.

Beautiful image but seems a little blurry, sharpened version reveal lot of details indeed!
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 11:40 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.