IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
InSight mission
rlorenz
post Sep 14 2012, 10:35 PM
Post #76


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 394
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (Yooper @ Sep 14 2012, 12:34 PM) *
Two, can someone offer a sense of how sensitive will the seismometer be? How small a Marsquake could it measure (could that measurement be expressed in the Richer scale?)?


There is a graph and equation of ground motion vs distance for events of different magnitude in my paper above.... (it took me a long time to find that information succinctly expressed..) So given the sensitivity in nm or nm/s or nm/s2 (depending on whether it it displacement or velocity or acceleration that the instrument measures) you can figure out how large an event is detectable at a given distance. Of course with Viking it wasnt instrument sensitivity that was the limiting factor most of the time, but the wind noise background. That was actually pretty low at night, though.

There was one possible Magnitude 3.5 event detected in the Viking data (if that's what it was, it was a couple of hundred km away), although there were not contemporaneous meteorological measurements so a wind gust or dust devil or similar event cannot be excluded. (and of course since the VL-1 seismometer didnt uncage, the event couldnt be confirmed by an independent detection which presumably would not have a wind gust at just the same time - in fact the lack of 2 or more stations was considered the major deficiency of the Viking investigation)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yooper
post Sep 21 2012, 10:40 AM
Post #77


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 24-August 12
Member No.: 6611



Thanks! BTW, in a odd twist of timing, I just finished "Titan Unveiled" this morning! A very enjoyable read, and very cool timing with your reply!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Apr 1 2013, 06:25 AM
Post #78


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 618
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Vancouver, British Columbia
Member No.: 5221



Apparently the general region for landing has been narrowed down, Elysium Planitia, though the 16 candidate sites need to be narrowed down
according to the PI.

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1303/30insight

Hopefully whichever has a volcano on the horizon is the one, for those of us who like topography wink.gif

Edit: should've searched the previous pages. I thought the article was more than just a rehash, sorry for the bump.


--------------------
To a body of infinite size there can be ascribed neither centre nor boundary... Thus the Earth no more than any other world is at the centre. -Giordano Bruno, 1584.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 07:48 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.