IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

35 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
New Horizons: Approach Phase, OpsNav - 25 January 15 to 28 June 15
MahFL
post Feb 4 2015, 09:22 PM
Post #1


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



The LORRI image release for today is up at :

http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-A...p?page=20150204


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JTN
post Feb 4 2015, 11:23 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 20-November 05
From: Mare Desiderii
Member No.: 563



QUOTE (MahFL @ Feb 4 2015, 09:22 PM) *
The LORRI image release for today is up at :
http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-A...p?page=20150204

Are we seeing a terminator here, or is that an artifact?

Looking at Solar System Simulator (one, two) I think the terminator's in the wrong place to match the "flat side", but I might be driving SSS wrong (e.g. not attempted to check for SCET/ERT). In any case phase is only 14.1°. And "Pluto and Charon subtended 2 pixels and 1 pixel, respectively" (I guess the larger 'discs' are due to lack of deconvolution). So I guess it's just an artifact of some kind.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarsInMyLifetime
post Feb 5 2015, 06:17 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 148
Joined: 9-August 11
From: Mason, TX
Member No.: 6108



We need a lot more pixels in order to differentiate a gibbous shape from a true circle. This shape is pretty much an artifact of making a very few points try to approximate a circle. On the other hand, the two are separated by enough pixels that the barycenter of their dance is truly a point in space between them, about 1/3 the distance from Pluto, now very easy to imagine in this gif.


--------------------
--
Don
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Feb 5 2015, 03:08 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 697
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



The apparent shapes of Pluto and Charon at this resolution are still dominated by the LORRI point-spread function, which is slightly teardrop-shaped, giving that gibbous appearance. It will be another month or two before we see the true shape of Pluto, and then Charon a little later. Can't wait!

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Feb 7 2015, 09:50 PM
Post #5


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



Even though the resolution is far too low to reveal anything like phase angle or surface markings I decided to check the viewing geometry. At first the results were confusing to me; the reason is Pluto's axial tilt. For the OPNAV on 2015-01-27 03:21:00 it was like this:

Attached Image


Pluto's north is down since its axial tilt is ~120°. This is a bit confusing (should one display future images that show some details with Pluto's north up or down?).

The orientation of the 2015-01-27 03:21:00 OPNAV isn't like this. Here is a view from the Solar System Simulator at the time of the OPNAV. Here north is also down:

Attached Image



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jgoldader
post Feb 8 2015, 04:20 AM
Post #6


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 5-September 07
Member No.: 3662



QUOTE (Bjorn Jonsson @ Feb 7 2015, 04:50 PM) *
Pluto's north is down since its axial tilt is ~120°. This is a bit confusing (should one display future images that show some details with Pluto's north up or down?).


Right-hand rule or bust!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Feb 8 2015, 08:45 PM
Post #7


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



For painful detail on the issue of Pluto cartography, read my blog entry about Amanda Zangari's work on this or her recently published paper (which is open-access).

Short version: there is much confusion in the literature about whether north is north or south of the ecliptic, and whether longitude increases east or west; the recommendation is to use right-hand rule going forward, but beware that the New Horizons planning software does *not* use this convention, although JPL Horizons does.


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Feb 8 2015, 09:33 PM
Post #8


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



I had forgotten about this blog entry - thanks for pointing it out. I'm a bit relieved to know that I'm not the only one that is confused!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alk3997
post Feb 9 2015, 05:54 PM
Post #9


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 31-January 15
From: Houston, TX USA
Member No.: 7390



It's just too soon to see any detail. In the original non-enhanced image, Pluto is only 2 pixels in size and Charon is 1 pixel wide. Luckily time will fix that.

Looking forward to the 4x4 binned images. Hopefully those will be released this week or next. Resolution won't be better but sensitivity will be. It will be interesting to see Nix & Hydra orbiting Pluto/Charon.

Andy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alk3997
post Feb 12 2015, 09:36 PM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 31-January 15
From: Houston, TX USA
Member No.: 7390



New Pluto/Charon animation available from end of January:
http://www.nasa.gov/content/the-view-from-...ml#.VN0cuvnF98H

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Feb 17 2015, 07:01 PM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



For those members (and I include myself) who are not entirely au-fait with celestial mechanics, I found these animations very useful in making sense of the Pluto/Charon orbital dance in the latest opnav campaign images. (Scroll up).....

Jase
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Feb 18 2015, 05:14 PM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 697
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



QUOTE (alk3997 @ Feb 9 2015, 11:54 AM) *
ILooking forward to the 4x4 binned images. Hopefully those will be released this week or next. Resolution won't be better but sensitivity will be. It will be interesting to see Nix & Hydra orbiting Pluto/Charon.



And here they are: Nix and Hydra movie release

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alk3997
post Feb 18 2015, 06:01 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 112
Joined: 31-January 15
From: Houston, TX USA
Member No.: 7390



QUOTE (john_s @ Feb 18 2015, 11:14 AM) *
And here they are: Nix and Hydra movie release

John


Thank you, John! Changing the attitude of the spacecraft to prevent a digital artifact from obscuring a moon may be a first in the space program. One of many firsts for New Horizons.

Probably a bit too early to analyze Nix and Hydra's surface features, eh?

Andy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Mar 9 2015, 02:19 PM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



QUOTE (john_s @ Feb 18 2015, 11:14 AM) *
And here they are...


What is the object that appears on frames 4-6 (circled in the clipped version of the animation below)? There's a similar object that appears once in frame 7 (circled, with question mark), but in a slightly different location. The object in frames 4-6 clearly seems to be an object moving downwards. Camera artifact? Other known satellite? Random KBO drifting past?

Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Mar 9 2015, 05:24 PM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 697
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



We noticed that bright spot and looked into it- it turns out that it’s a hot pixel on the CCD that was not corrected by the rather quick-and-dirty processing that went into making that movie. When we go back to the original images, it’s always in the same place on the camera frame regardless of where the camera is pointing, so we know it’s not real. We'll have better processing in future releases.

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

35 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 09:32 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.