IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages V  « < 17 18 19 20 21 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Juno development, launch, and cruise, Including Earth flyby imaging Oct 9 2013
peter59
post Jul 26 2011, 07:41 PM
Post #271


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 568
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Silesia
Member No.: 299



QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 26 2011, 07:34 PM) *
What is there to be excited about right now?

Last preparation for launch is not fascinating ?



--------------------
Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 26 2011, 07:48 PM
Post #272


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (peter59 @ Jul 26 2011, 11:41 AM) *
Last preparation for launch is not fascinating ?


For the general public? Not really. For most space enthusiasts...there really isn't much to talk about.

People are not excited because it's not exciting. One defines the other
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Jul 26 2011, 08:05 PM
Post #273


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



QUOTE (peter59 @ Jul 26 2011, 07:54 PM) *
Amazing how low is interest in the Juno mission.


People want pretty pictures.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Jul 26 2011, 08:12 PM
Post #274


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



If it were planning a survey of the satellites, like Cassini and (in a better world) Galileo, I'd be plenty excited. Particles & fields and distant images of clouds on Jupiter is something I'm having trouble getting excited about. That being said, I'm perfectly happy the let the particles & fields folks have this one to themselves, as I suppose it's their turn -- and I'm sure they'll learn something interesting & valuable. The mission I'd get really excited about would be a Europa orbiter or rover.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toma B
post Jul 26 2011, 08:43 PM
Post #275


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 648
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Subotica
Member No.: 384



QUOTE (jasedm @ Jul 26 2011, 10:05 PM) *
People want pretty pictures.

...and thats not what they will get a lot from this mission.


--------------------
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare

My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jul 26 2011, 09:14 PM
Post #276


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (Toma B @ Jul 26 2011, 12:43 PM) *
...and thats not what they will get a lot from this mission.

You'll be surprised.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Jul 26 2011, 10:05 PM
Post #277


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



I may be alone in this (on this forum, no doubt the Juno science team agree) but I'm really stoked about the non-imaging bias of Juno. I like pictures, and they do convey a sense of immediacy, but imaging is only one way of collecting data, and not a particularly useful one for many scientific objectives.

Here's hoping that there's plenty of weird data gathered that changes how we understand Gas Giants and solar system dynamics.

And there will be plenty of Junocam images in any case for those who find that boring.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
punkboi
post Jul 27 2011, 12:37 AM
Post #278


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 540
Joined: 25-October 05
From: California
Member No.: 535



If NASA collected names to fly on this mission a la Cassini and the Mars rovers, then I'd be excited. Of course, the microchip or CD bearing the names would probably be erased by the radiation not too long after Juno enters Jovian orbit. (I'm into space exploration for all the wrong reasons smile.gif)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Jul 27 2011, 03:17 AM
Post #279


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



For whatever reason, the Juno team doesn't seem to have done much outreach. Their web site http://juno.wisc.edu/index_whatsnew.html hasn't been updated in three years.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jul 27 2011, 03:22 AM
Post #280


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Yeah, that's something I noticed recently too. Apparently the reason that that site hasn't been taken down is "it's complicated." Anyway, the place to go for current Juno mission news and educational information is http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/main/index.html


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 27 2011, 03:35 AM
Post #281


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



There is http://missionjuno.swri.edu/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Jul 27 2011, 06:16 AM
Post #282


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1418
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



I suppose it's too early to think about potential asteroid flybys? Or has that been ruled out already?


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jul 27 2011, 06:36 AM
Post #283


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



They never mentioned any, as far as I know.
Juno will be in the main belt twice, both before and after the Earth flyby, so that doubles the chance of an encounter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mchan
post Jul 27 2011, 07:50 AM
Post #284


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: 26-August 05
Member No.: 476



With a tight budget, it would be tough to plan and execute an encounter. E.g., you'd have to develop instrument sequences, increase DSN allocation, temporarily increase operations staff, etc.

Juno instruments are mostly for fields and non-imaging data which are not optimum for a solid body encounter so science return is low compared to a spacecraft such as Dawn.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
machi
post Jul 27 2011, 10:08 AM
Post #285


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 796
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Heart of Europe
Member No.: 4057



QUOTE (peter59 @ Jul 26 2011, 09:41 PM) *
Last preparation for launch is not fascinating ?


No, it isn't. It's horror and it's time full of fear from failure. After successful launch, then it's fascinating. smile.gif

QUOTE (helvick @ Jul 27 2011, 12:05 AM) *
I may be alone in this (on this forum, no doubt the Juno science team agree) but I'm really stoked about the non-imaging bias of Juno. I like pictures, and they do convey a sense of immediacy, but imaging is only one way of collecting data, and not a particularly useful one for many scientific objectives.


No, you are not. Juno is capable of probing Jupiter's atmosphere hundreds of bars deep (it's significantly more, than Galileo's probe could) and she can reveal fine structure of Jupiter's interior.
This is really amazing!

mchan:
I don't think they (Juno team) are planning asteroid encounter, but Juno is theoretically capable of imaging (Junocam, JIRAM), probably mapping surface of asteroid (with JIRAM) and she can find mass of asteroid (RSS). It is more, than NEAR did in Mathilde flyby (only imaging and mass measurements). Question is, if Juno can successfully track such small and fast target.
Some irregular moon of Jupiter would be another interesting target.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

40 Pages V  « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 11:00 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.