IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

no MARDI images from Phoenix
mcaplinger
post Nov 14 2007, 03:26 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



http://www.msss.com/msl/mardi/news/12Nov07/index.html


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Nov 15 2007, 01:24 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The cut from many images to one image was nasty - and I admit I really feel sorry for the MSSS guys who've lost two MARDI's now. The cut from one image to none in some respects makes a bit of sense, if the funds can be freed up to fly MARDI as a result. One PHX-MARDI image, or an HD MSL-MARDI movie....that's not a hard call to make imho. Of course, ideally, the answer would be 'both'.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Nov 15 2007, 02:31 PM
Post #3


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



This reminds me (on a much smaller scale, since with HIRISE, the science to be gained from MARDI isn't in the same ballpark as this example) of the decision to not use the remote sensing instruments during Galileo's approach to Jupiter after the tape recorder anomaly. Wes Huntress angered a lot of people with his decision. Granted, given the performance of the tape recorder for the rest of the mission, the data probably could have been taken. However, had the tape recorder had another glitch and the probe data been lost (or worse, had it snapped outright and essentially ruined the LGA-based mission plan), there would have been hell to pay, and on the heels of Mars Observer, which had failed only two years earlier, may have been catastrophic for the entire planetary program. Chances are, taking the MARDI images would be fine. But given the coverage the mission would get if they ignored a known glitch and crashed (even if it was later proven not to be the cause). I think the only way a successful Phoenix (or the MER, for that matter, since they are still kicking...um, I mean rolling) would get that kind of coverage is if they photographed a martian dog walking up and urinating on the lander's leg (or rover's wheel - just walking by probably wouldn't get as much coverage as a failure).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 07:05 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.