IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

22 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Southward from San Antonio to the Next Waypoint
Bill Harris
post Apr 16 2010, 02:18 PM
Post #106


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



I think Oppy will turn East when she gets to a lane of bedrock about 250m South of San Antonio and this bedrock (The Yellow Brick Road??) looks persistent all the way to Santa Maria.

The distant views to Lazu, Miyamoto, et al seem a little more contrasty, so the air is clearing. The near horizon towards the Mule Ears seems a bit lower and I think that the near horizon towards Lazu will drop once we top that local rise.

Good road wheel.gif and nice scenery pancam.gif . Can life get much better?

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Apr 17 2010, 02:25 PM
Post #107


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Another bit of a straight passage to the East on sol 2213: https://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...HUP1966R0M1.JPG

Between "Mule Ears" and "Rockaway" we've gained more and more space: https://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...PLP2412R1M6.JPG


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Apr 17 2010, 02:36 PM
Post #108


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



That navcam image was taken on 2213, but before that sol's drive. So it shows the eastward jog from sol 2211. The 2213 drive was southwards:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...0M1.JPG?sol2213
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Apr 17 2010, 02:50 PM
Post #109


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Aha, right: 1N324643261EFFAFHUP1966R0M1 / 2213 / 12:22:32


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Apr 18 2010, 02:23 PM
Post #110


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



Looking ahead on the projected route in GM, I interpret the terrain as follows:

300 m Ripple size noticeably reduced (start of mainly eastward travel)
1.4 km Patches of larger ripples return amidst large stretches of exposed bedrock
1.9 km Larger ripples end, increasing amount of exposed bedrock
3.8 km Transition to "tarmac"
5.6 km Big hole in the ground that will probably slow Oppy down for awhile smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Apr 18 2010, 11:51 PM
Post #111


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1426
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



More progress.

Not sure why but I like this image a lot.

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Apr 19 2010, 09:38 PM
Post #112


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



QUOTE (marsroverdriver)
That was about as simple as they get: another sol, another ~70m SE toward Endeavour Crater.


wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Apr 19 2010, 10:13 PM
Post #113


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



That will be sol 2218 i.e. tomorrow.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Apr 20 2010, 02:07 AM
Post #114


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



And the wind has apparently increased. As I noted before, once we got past the wind shadow of the topographic rise at Concepcion, the ripple morphology changed with the suggestion of a wind velocity increase.

I have noticed an accumulation of dust in the low-gain antenna since the conjunction stopover at Santorini around Sol 1710. THsi dust collected as a ring around the top of the antenna and was persistent up to the arrival at Concepcion around Sol 2130. A recent Navcam view of the antenna on Sol 2211, after leaving San Antonio craters, shows that the antenna dust is no longer present.

I wonder if there have been recent cleaning events and what the watt-hour readings currently are?

--Bill
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Poolio
post Apr 20 2010, 02:15 AM
Post #115


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 28-October 08
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 4469



And what effect, if any, such an event may have had on the Mini-TES?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Apr 20 2010, 02:13 PM
Post #116


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 20 2010, 03:07 AM) *
I wonder if there have been recent cleaning events and what the watt-hour readings currently are?

You're last image was sol 2211. Last week's Oppy update said:
QUOTE
As of Sol 2211 (April 13, 2010), the solar array energy production was 227 watt-hours with an atmospheric opacity (tau) of 0.347 and a dust factor of 0.474.

That 227 level was continuing a slow drop. More importantly the dust factor also continues a slow drop, with some fluctuations from week to week. So it seems any changes on the low gain haven't been accompanied by big changes on the arrays.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 20 2010, 02:22 PM
Post #117


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



From Scott

~250W-hr/sol as of last downlink.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Apr 20 2010, 03:16 PM
Post #118


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



We've been having generally a slow decline in power with small week to week fluctuations. That 250 Whr number doesn't tell us too much - maybe the tau dropped a bit from last week and dust factor stayed constant, or maybe tau and dust factor both increased a bit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NW71
post Apr 20 2010, 09:42 PM
Post #119


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 19-January 10
From: Grimsby, N.E. Lincs, UK
Member No.: 5179



QUOTE (fredk @ Apr 20 2010, 04:16 PM) *
We've been having generally a slow decline in power with small week to week fluctuations.


Evening all rolleyes.gif

There appears to be relatively little concern on this forum and the jpl site re the power levels for Oppy. Is this due to experience gained and a solar panel clearing event is anticipated/expected or is it simply that these things are in the lap of the gods and hence not worth worrying ourselves with?

Neil
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Apr 20 2010, 10:53 PM
Post #120


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Over the past six years we've observed The Cleaning Zephyrs breeze by frequently enough that we know that obscured solar panels are not an issue. I had noticed that a 500 Sol accumulation of dust on one of the antennas had disappeared and was wondering if a "cleaning event" had been noted also. This is sometimes related to the output of the solar panels, but can also be dependent upon atmospheric transparency and the annual insolation cycle.

I have seen some Pancam images of the miniTES calibration target recently, so maybe someone at JPL is hoping for improvement of that instrument. 'Twould be nice to have it back.

--Bill



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

22 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th May 2024 - 09:38 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.