IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

41 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Rosetta - Early Orbital Operations at Comet 67P C-G, August 6, 2014 - November 13, 2014
centsworth_II
post Aug 6 2014, 12:56 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



In the press briefing it was noted that the blue represents constant shadow, the red constant light and the yellow shows areas with dark and light periods. Also from the briefing, they want the landing area 'to have a clear day/night cycle for scientific reasons.'

Attached Image

Screen shots from the video linked by Emily in post 10.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Aug 6 2014, 12:57 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



Overview image of the imges posted by Astro0,
Attached Image

and two images showing the zone of major dust/volatile release:
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcgyver
post Aug 6 2014, 01:03 PM
Post #18


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 1-August 14
Member No.: 7227



How to figure out scale in these wonderful images?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaro_in_Montreal
post Aug 6 2014, 01:07 PM
Post #19


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 3-August 12
Member No.: 6454



QUOTE (0101Morpheus @ Aug 6 2014, 01:48 PM) *
blink.gif Indeed

There is an incredible amount variable terrain for such a small object. Could sublimation be the cause or is it something else? wacko.gif

Just a guess..... but it looks to me like the smaller component's shape, resembling half of an apple core, is the result of large amounts of material spalling off during the initial collision that formed this bizarre comet nucleus, leaving just a conical central part at the contact point - which subsequently filled in a bit with dust & debris.....

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anticitizen2
post Aug 6 2014, 01:09 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 201
Joined: 16-December 13
Member No.: 7067



QUOTE (walfy @ Jul 31 2014, 06:16 PM) *
A quick size comparison with the Burj Khalifa, current tallest human-made structure.

Re-posting this very useful image by walfy of the comet on July 29th
The Burj Khalifa is about 830m tall if that works as a celestial kilometer-stick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Aug 6 2014, 01:11 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 696
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



Wow. And spooky! This was designed by Tim Burton (or maybe Terry Gilliam)

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Aug 6 2014, 01:16 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (mcgyver @ Aug 6 2014, 09:03 AM) *
How to figure out scale in these wonderful images?
End to end longways is 4 km (2.5 miles). Boulders seen in the closeups were described as 'house sized'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tolis
post Aug 6 2014, 01:32 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 149
Joined: 18-June 08
Member No.: 4216



QUOTE (Gerald @ Aug 6 2014, 12:57 PM) *
Overview image of the imges posted by Astro0,
and two images showing the zone of major dust/volatile release:
ADMIN EDIT: Please do not requote images when posting.

Volatiles seem to be emitted primarily from the "neck". Is this similar to what was observed at Hartley 2 I wonder?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Aug 6 2014, 01:51 PM
Post #24


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10127
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



No, it's the opposite of Hartley 2.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Aug 6 2014, 02:07 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



Maybe the neck jets represent the sublimation of superficial ice that collected in cold sinks at the end of the comet's last pass rather than indicating a deep structure of ice in the neck.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Aug 6 2014, 02:33 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



Here is a magnified "low"-resolution version of one of today's OSIRIS images (via screenshot), with a high-resolution patch of the "neck":
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DFinfrock
post Aug 6 2014, 03:38 PM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 166
Joined: 20-September 05
From: North Texas
Member No.: 503



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Aug 6 2014, 01:56 PM) *
In the press briefing it was noted that the blue represents constant shadow, the red constant light and the yellow shows areas with dark and light periods. Also from the briefing, they want the landing area 'to have a clear day/night cycle for scientific reasons.'
Screen shots from the video linked by Emily in post 10.
ADMIN EDIT: Please do not requote images when posting.

If there are no significant engineering or safety constraints, I hope that the landing site selection committee avoids the areas at the end of either lobe of the comet. There you would have a great view of the local surface and dark space above. But if they can safely land in one of those green spots closer to the neck of the comet, just imagine the spectacular view - not only of the local surface, but of the other half of the comet looming overhead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
machi
post Aug 6 2014, 04:07 PM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 796
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Heart of Europe
Member No.: 4057



Stereo image of the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. One image is original from OSIRIS camera (date 3.8.2014).
Second one is synthetic image obtained from OSIRIS and NavCam images. Resolution is 5.3 m/pix.
Credit for original images: ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/.DASP/IDA/NavCam.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
machi
post Aug 6 2014, 04:08 PM
Post #29


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 796
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Heart of Europe
Member No.: 4057



And here is cross-eye version of the same stereo image:


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Aug 6 2014, 04:37 PM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



Wonderful achievement to be here after so many years! Congrats to ESA.

To me the surface looks like snow banks shaped after a fierce storm.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

41 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 11:57 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.