IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Comet Prospects For 2006
ljk4-1
post Jan 30 2006, 06:48 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



To quote:

2006 sees the possible return of 26 periodic comets and several of these are likely to come within range of visual observation with moderate apertures. Potentially, the most exciting is the close passage of 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann in May.

Theories on the structure of comets suggest that any comet could fragment at any time, so it is worth keeping an eye on some of the fainter periodic comets, which are often ignored. This would make a useful project for CCD observers. As an example 51P/Harrington was observed to fragment in 2001. Ephemerides for new and currently observable comets are published in the Circulars, Comet Section Newsletters and on the Section, CBAT and Seiichi Yoshida's web pages. Complete ephemerides and magnitude parameters for all comets predicted to be brighter than about 21m are given in the International Comet Quarterly Handbook; details of subscription to the ICQ are available from the comet section Director. The updated section booklet on comet observing is available from the BAA office or the Director.

http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jds/preds06.htm


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ljk4-1
post Jan 31 2006, 04:27 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



Are there any plans to explore comets that have broken apart? Forget a single copper ball making a crater that no one could see into anyway - we could examine up close bodies literally split right through for us already!


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Jan 31 2006, 10:04 PM
Post #3





Guests






This was one of the main goals of CONTOUR -- SW-3, its second destination, had broken into three pieces just a few years earlier, and they anticipated flying by one of them and getting a nice cross-sectional view. (Near-IR spectra suggested that the biggest piece had one side made of different materials, probably exposed by the rupture.) The trouble now is that SW-3 is apparently continuing to crumble, and there may be nothing left to look at by the next opportunity to fly by it in 2017-2022.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 02:51 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.