IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
10 Hygeia a dwarf planet
antipode
post Oct 31 2019, 10:22 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: 1-October 06
Member No.: 1206



Did people notice this?

SPHERE is a powerful instrument, I'm waiting for it to have a go at the more recondite 704 Internamnia and 324 Bamberga.

ESOCast 211

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBi-KeZABl4

P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Oct 31 2019, 11:26 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1903
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



Just because it's spherical now on account of an accident of formation doesn't mean that it meets the definition of a dwarf planet ("has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape")

I think ESO is reaching on this one.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 31 2019, 11:27 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8406
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Reminder to please review rule 1.9 carefully before posting; we're not gonna be debating planethood.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsbug
post Nov 2 2019, 09:03 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 353
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



@mcaplinger
QUOTE
Just because it's spherical now on account of an accident of formation doesn't mean that it meets the definition of a dwarf planet ("has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape")

I think ESO is reaching on this one.


Without attempting to debate the definition of a planet... given some reasonable assumptions about composition, and what is known of Hygia's density and mass, surely this can be quickly settled by calculation, at least to a reasonable approximation?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Nov 2 2019, 09:26 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2197
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



Wikipedia gives presumably accurate (with noted error bars) physical dimensions for the larger asteroids.

However, whatever is known about mass and size, the internal physical structure is an unknown in every case.

The exemplars on either side of the hydrostatic equilibrium boundary are all significantly larger than Hygeia, so it seems more likely to be an accident than actual hydrostatic equilibrium, but it's always possible that it's got a composition that flows more easily than other comparably-sized worlds. Or, that it underwent state changes in the past, and that was once true.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th December 2019 - 12:01 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.