IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
STS 122, Colombus to the ISS
nprev
post Dec 9 2007, 12:04 PM
Post #16


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Yep.

This has gotta be a wiring problem; weird, intermittent sensor malfunctions almost invariably are. Thermal contraction at an interface point once the LH2 hits it?


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blobrana
post Dec 9 2007, 02:57 PM
Post #17


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 8-August 05
Member No.: 457



A preliminary launch date has now been set for 2 January, 2008.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Dec 9 2007, 05:48 PM
Post #18


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Good call. They've learned the lesson of Challenger well, then. I was more than a little concerned about the time pressure causing hasty decisions.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Dec 10 2007, 08:02 AM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



As a tech support rep for Comcast, I can tell these guys exactly how to fix their problem:

1) Unplug everything.

2) Leave everything unplugged for a good 30 seconds.

3) Plug everything back in, in sequence from upstream to downstream (in terms of signal flow).

Works every time... rolleyes.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 10 2007, 08:37 AM
Post #20


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14433
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



It worked for our little network here at work - if I did it any other way, we wouldn't get gbit networking throughout.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Dec 11 2007, 01:27 PM
Post #21


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Bloody cable & computer guys... tongue.gif

Believe it or not, fuel quantity sensing systems are almost always the most difficult things to troubleshoot on aircraft. These level sensors probably aren't so bad, but I wish I knew their operating principle.

AC-excited capacitive sensors are the worst by far; any little cable or shielding fault often screws things up royally or causes an endless series of intermittent, difficult-to-duplicate problems. I've been in situations where it was actually easier to rewire an entire tank then to spend time finding the actual fault.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Dec 11 2007, 06:30 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



The ECO sensors are indeed capacitance sensors. I don't have data at the moment as to whether or not they're AC-excited, but they're definitely capacitance sensors.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Dec 11 2007, 08:00 PM
Post #23


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Oh, lovely (not)... sad.gif Hopefully, then, they're DC-excited; these are much easier systems to troubleshoot since the cable shielding isn't part of the overall signal path. Given the age of the Shuttle, though, I suspect that they're AC after all.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Dec 11 2007, 10:21 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



And now... this:

A giant spider attacks the shuttle Atlantis.

Attached Image


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Dec 11 2007, 10:42 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



zOMG, look how many strap-on boosters that thing has!!11


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Dec 11 2007, 10:47 PM
Post #26


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Now that's what I call a serious software bug problem... ohmy.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Dec 12 2007, 07:58 AM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Tintin get the same trouble once, but it was on "L'étoile mystérieuse" not "Objectif Lune"...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Doc
post Dec 12 2007, 11:10 AM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 11-December 07
From: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Member No.: 3978



Hi, im new here. Just joined yesterday. Its hard to get connected to the rest of the world when yer in the middle of Africa.....Tanzania, Dar es Salaam to be precise. Any way im sure all of of us hav one thing in common.....the postponed launch of STS-122. I mean c'mon, i'v watched most of the shuttle launches since "Discovery's Return to Flight" mission but this has got to be one of the most frustrating missions i hav ever had the pleasure to witness.


Anyway, safety coms first i suppose. I didnt notice that spider picture posted by lyford!
It kind of reminds me of Tintin in "The Shooting Star".

Here's to a succesful launch on 2nd January.


--------------------
We talk of nothing but Curiosity here
Follow me on twitter or Google +
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Dec 12 2007, 03:50 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Doc @ Dec 12 2007, 06:10 AM) *
...this has got to be one of the most frustrating missions i have ever had the pleasure to witness.

Ironically it looked like one of the smoothest up to the point where the current problem occurred.
Having lived a two hour drive from The Cape the entire life of the Shuttle program, this was going
to be the first time I made the drive to see a launch. All the stars were in alignment: Beautiful
weather, no serious problems being worked, wife and I both finagled time off from work.... Oh, well.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Airbag
post Dec 12 2007, 06:22 PM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 408
Joined: 3-August 05
Member No.: 453



All kinds of ECO sensor info (but no sensor AC/DC info) at:

http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/news/ECO_graphics.html

Airbag
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th June 2024 - 10:34 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.