IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

17 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Falcon 9 Launch & Recovery Operations
ugordan
post Mar 10 2010, 10:57 AM
Post #91


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ Mar 10 2010, 03:25 AM) *
They detected an anomoly

Honest question: is anomoly a valid alternative spelling of anomaly? I've seen it spelled that way countless times, yet it doesn't appear to show up in (online) dictionaries. unsure.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Mar 10 2010, 12:53 PM
Post #92


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Don't think so, G. Anomaly is the only correct spelling AFAIK.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 10 2010, 02:36 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Recorded video of the event: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_0KqS13weI


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Mar 10 2010, 06:06 PM
Post #94


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



QUOTE (ugordan @ Mar 10 2010, 02:57 AM) *
Honest question: is anomoly a valid alternative spelling of anomaly? I've seen it spelled that way countless times, yet it doesn't appear to show up in (online) dictionaries. unsure.gif

Just a typo -- mine, not SpaceX's or Spaceflight Now's. Even native speakers sometimes have trouble with the spelling associated with reduced vowels. It varies all over the map from one word to another, even though the sound is just "uh". In this case, though, "anomoly" actually looks wrong to me -- no clue why I typed it. Getting old perhaps. :-)

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 10 2010, 08:32 PM
Post #95


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Got it, thanks. I thought maybe it's one of those things like sulfur/sulphur, etc.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Mar 10 2010, 11:51 PM
Post #96


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Yes, spelling in English is a constant joy for us all (even native speakers, as Greg stated)... rolleyes.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Mar 11 2010, 10:40 PM
Post #97


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



Those sneaky SpaceX guys! After implying they might take several days before attempting another static firing, they set up to do one today (without telling anyone) but had to call it off because of weather.

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/001/status.html

Supposedly April 12 is the current planned launch date, but Elon says to think of this as "Beta Testing." Problems are expected to come from various causes, and we shouldn't get worked up over them.

He did say they figured out what caused the abort of the last test fire. "The problem was pretty simple: our autostart sequence didn't issue the command to the normally closed ground side isolation valve. We had tested everything on the vehicle side exhaustively in Texas, but didn't have this iso valve on our test stand there. Definitely a lesson learned to make sure that *everything* is the same between test stand and launch pad on the ground side, not just on the vehicle side."

They're hoping for better weather Saturday or Sunday for the next test.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Mar 13 2010, 04:32 PM
Post #98


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



We should be about one hour from the live fire at 12:30 EST (9:30 PST or 1730Z) and Spaceflight Now has a live video feed going.

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/001/status.html

Not as exciting as the real thing, but kind of cool anyway.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 13 2010, 05:40 PM
Post #99


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Ignition happened on time at 12:30 PM local, waiting for official report on the burn. Looked better than the last time, and longer.

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Mar 13 2010, 10:04 PM
Post #100


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1417
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



Successful.
QUOTE
Today, SpaceX successfully completed a test firing of the inaugural Falcon 9 launch vehicle at Space Launch Complex 40 located at Cape Canaveral. Following a nominal terminal countdown, the launch sequencer commanded ignition of all 9 Merlin first stage engines for a period of 3.5 seconds.


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Mar 13 2010, 11:43 PM
Post #101


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Yesss.... smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Mar 14 2010, 12:07 AM
Post #102


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



That must have been some sound.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 14 2010, 10:16 AM
Post #103


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Images from the firing: http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=19279

Video to follow.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rakhir
post Mar 14 2010, 08:57 PM
Post #104


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 370
Joined: 12-September 05
From: France
Member No.: 495



A video is visible here :
http://flametrench.flatoday.net/2010/03/sp...g_14.html#links
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 14 2010, 09:25 PM
Post #105


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



http://www.spacex.com/multimedia/videos.php?id=47
http://www.spacex.com/multimedia/videos.php?id=48


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

17 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 07:49 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.