Opportunity Found By Moc, Backshell imaged by pancam |
Opportunity Found By Moc, Backshell imaged by pancam |
Feb 9 2004, 05:36 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2004/02/09/index.html
Again - awesome stuff - that possible backshell in the Navcam imagery WAS the backshell, pancam has nailed it since. Doug |
|
|
Feb 9 2004, 06:02 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 9-February 04 Member No.: 14 |
All the images from these two rovers have been extremely good. Both from the rovers themselves and orbiter pictures of them.
They never got pictures that good of the other lander sites from orbit. This is probably because of dust buildup. Also, the clarity of the backshell/parachute in the pancam image is extremely good. Much better then what they could see from Pathfinder. My distance estimate for the backshell was fairly close. I estimated 1300 feet in a previous post. They say it is 1444 feet. |
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 02:23 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 8-February 04 From: Melbourne, Australia Member No.: 5 |
One reason we didn't get such good pics of Pathfinder and Viking is that they are smaller. Also, the image people at Malin have got smarter and program aquisition to try to get sun reflection back off the bright parts of the lander, and they have their new method of rolling while acquiring to get better definition in the flight dierection.
Multiple reasons... Everything helps -------------------- - Nick
===================================== Nick Hoffman Mars Specialist 3D-GEO Pty Ltd Melbourne Australia http://whitemars.com "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948) ===================================== |
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 04:51 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3231 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
I'm just impressed that the backshell can be seen from that far away. The MOC image showed that the backshell was 450m away
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Feb 11 2004, 07:33 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 11-February 04 Member No.: 24 |
Something that bothered me about that far off picture of MER-B's backshell was its color. The color of the backshell on the martian surface was tan/orange with bits of white. The photo of the backshell while MER was being constructed shows it as uniformly white:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/spa..._aeroshell.html The EDL Critical Design Review document shows the peak heat flux on the backshell to be under 2 watts/cm^2. I initially asked myself: Why did it discolor so much? Then I reread the JPL URL above and it said: "Also, instead of being painted, the backshell will be covered with a very thin aluminized mylar blanket to protect it from the cold of deep space. The blanket will vaporize during Mars atmospheric entry." This actually solves two mysteries at once. I know that the backshell TPS material is SLA-561S which is an orange colored spray on ablator. The mylar blanket must be the reason why the backshell was white instead of orange for the above URL. Mylar would have vaporaized at under 2 watts/cm^2. The bits of white are probably pieces of mylar that didn't vaporize away during entry. I hope they get a close look at the backshell. Gary |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 11:09 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |