The impact of not having MGS around |
The impact of not having MGS around |
Nov 27 2006, 12:06 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Berlin Member No.: 744 |
I also think that MGS was a fine spacecraft and wish it was around for another Martian year or two. But I was wondering: in what way will our presence at Mars be different without MGS? Are there some capabilities which are not overlapping with MRO and Odyssey?
-------------------- |
|
|
Nov 27 2006, 01:36 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 240 Joined: 18-July 06 Member No.: 981 |
If MGS is OOC, we've lost a high quality, reliable and proven instrument able to image surface features at 1.5m resolution. It's an incredibly valuable asset. Amateurs like us have lost the most as the public targeting program, an effort many of us have participated in, would be at an end. There's still a lot unseen on Mars and MOC is in a perfect position to turn up interesting features that would be missed altogether by HiRISE. It's a tangible loss, but with a sell-by date that has long since passed, we got out moneys worth.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 04:19 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |