IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

12 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Phoenix Final Descent Trajectory
dmuller
post May 29 2008, 08:46 PM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 11-April 08
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 4093



QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ May 30 2008, 02:16 AM) *
As for "recontact," ... It crisply captures the idea of "to collide with, at any speed, but after separation."

No doubt it is very precise language. Just imagine the press conference if the backshell did actually "recontact" with the lander on the ground!
Official: Ahm we've had an anomaly during landing as the backshell deviated from its nominal trajectory and recontacted the lander on the ground. We're currently working on the issue
Bewildered reporter: Huh, you mean the backshell crashed into the lander on the ground?
Official: It seems that an unplanned recontact was made and we're working the problem. We will update you during the next press conference (which I hope I wont have to attend ...)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dmuller
post May 30 2008, 09:06 AM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 11-April 08
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 4093



Building on VikingMars' work, assumed wind (straight line from lander to backshell-impact to backshell) and having Phoenix fly into the wind, heatshield impact and heatshield, and assuming that North is NOT straight up in the pic, the ground track could look like this:
Attached Image

(Sorry for the quality of the drawing ... I dont have any decent software, still using Windows Paint ph34r.gif )

EDIT: image reworked ... ignore this one and see post further below


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 30 2008, 10:34 AM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Dmuller, doesn't that north vector contradict with the observed orientation of the solar panels?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 30 2008, 10:39 AM
Post #19


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The vehicle intentionally rotated during terminal descent to put the arrays left right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 30 2008, 10:46 AM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Quite. If anything, I'd say north is about 12 degrees clockwise from up judging by solar panel orientation.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dmuller
post May 30 2008, 11:16 AM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 11-April 08
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 4093



QUOTE (ugordan @ May 30 2008, 08:34 PM) *
Dmuller, doesn't that north vector contradict with the observed orientation of the solar panels?

Yes of course, overlooked that piece of evidence blink.gif Yellow line up is North.
Attached Image

Assuming that the heatshield went straight into the ground (i.e. was not blown to the South by the wind), it would have about followed the blue line (as the landing ellipse went from NW to SE). So Phoenix would not have steered much to the North (into the wind), and the parachute made quite a trip South even though the atmosphere and hence the wind effect wasn't quite a hurricane as we know from Earth rolleyes.gif So the dark bulge to the SE of Phoenix would be windblown, and the bulge to the SW caused by the thrusters. It also looks like the backshell did hit the ground with quite some horizontal (N to S) speed judging from the ejectile and distance between first impact and backshell. The heatshield came in more vertical but bounced off to one side.

Even though all the debris is close to Phoenix, the landing design worked out very smart with all the relative movements and deviations. Great stuff


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post May 30 2008, 09:12 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Agree, Daniel. I reached same conclusions looking to pictures...
Anyway, I made this wallpaper from HiRes picture (eliminating pixelization from enlarged insets). North is almost up...
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adonis
post May 31 2008, 04:05 PM
Post #23


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 23-March 08
Member No.: 4072




Is anywhere information about the final landing chronology, specially the retro-phase ... I mean high versus time data?

Thanks
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post May 31 2008, 04:19 PM
Post #24


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



The project manager said it would take several months to put the edl sequence together from the data.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ahecht
post Jun 13 2008, 05:00 PM
Post #25


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 27-May 08
Member No.: 4145



There is an updated version of the EDL movie that was uploaded a couple days ago. While it doesn't appear to have ALL the EDL info in it (such as the creation of Holy Cow), it does show the partially-deployed parachute state as it was captured by HiRISE. I would've loved to see Heimdal in the background, but I guess a video like that will come once they have all the EDL numbers crunched.

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/phoenix/phx-20080611.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cndwrld
post Jul 9 2008, 12:46 PM
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: 17-February 07
From: ESAC, cerca Madrid, Spain.
Member No.: 1743



MEX Failed To Image The Descent

I'm not sure it was in this thread, but I read that people did not know if Mar Express managed to image anything during the descent. And the answer is No, unfortunately. The information was posted, but it was in a place that many people did not see it. If you are interested, it is at:

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Mars_Express/SEMAWQ1YUFF_0.html

Old news, but just for those who were curious.


--------------------
--
cndwrld@yahoo.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
01101001
post Jul 9 2008, 10:05 PM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 101
Joined: 29-January 06
Member No.: 667



The MRO team has given the Phoenix-on-parachute pixels another whack, and they might have spotted the falling heat shield:

Phoenix Descent with Color and the Heat Shield in Free-Fall
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pertinax
post Jul 9 2008, 10:58 PM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 198
Joined: 2-March 05
From: Richmond, VA USA
Member No.: 181



Kudos again to the MRO team and a Mars bar to T-Man et.al ( http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=116143 )

-- Pertinax
Reason for edit: fixed link
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jul 9 2008, 11:18 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



With the imaging by HIRISE, is there a definitive location (latitude, longitude) for Phoenix, to several decimal places?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pertinax
post Jul 9 2008, 11:59 PM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 198
Joined: 2-March 05
From: Richmond, VA USA
Member No.: 181



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jul 9 2008, 07:18 PM) *
With the imaging by HIRISE, is there a definitive location (latitude, longitude) for Phoenix, to several decimal places?


And altitude?

-- Pertinax
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

12 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 07:50 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.