IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

24 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Top of Vera Rubin Ridge Part 1, Site 66-67, sol 1812-1943, 11 Sep 2017-23 Jan 2018
serpens
post Oct 1 2017, 10:33 PM
Post #61


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



I think we need to wait and see what this little fellow is made of. While there may have been a few kilometres of sedimentary material covering this area in the past there would not be anywhere near the heat or pressure necessary for metamorphism. Could the apparent veining on the sunlit side be an artefact of reflectance?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Oct 2 2017, 12:49 AM
Post #62


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (serpens @ Oct 2 2017, 06:33 AM) *
I think we need to wait and see what this little fellow is made of....

We now have the R-MastCam frames of the two interesting 1831 ChemCam targets:
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Oct 2 2017, 01:43 AM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Given that we are still on a slope climbing towards the top of the ridge and these probably bounced down from a higher level, it wouldn't surprise to find that "Black Reef" is a chip off the old block so to speak.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorithm
post Oct 2 2017, 07:18 PM
Post #64


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 11-December 12
From: The home of Corby Crater (Corby-England)
Member No.: 6783



Only two in the immediate vicinity? If they were tumbling from above, wouldn't there be more? Having said that I don't know what "the immediate vicinity" is . Certainly seems to me to be out of context with their current location, very interesting that one seems to be a 'longer baked, bigger version, more developed', call it what you will, version of the other. Perhaps one arrived at it's current location long before the other?
Geology....madness solidified, I don't know how you do it!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Oct 2 2017, 11:41 PM
Post #65


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (serpens @ Oct 2 2017, 01:43 AM) *
Given that we are still on a slope climbing towards the top of the ridge and these probably bounced down from a higher level, it wouldn't surprise to find that "Black Reef" is a chip off the old block so to speak.


"Architecture is solid music" - von Goethe

"Geology is solid climatology" - me
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Oct 3 2017, 12:00 AM
Post #66


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



I would amend that to read " Sedimentary geology is solid climatology" - you.
I was in fact mulling over the possibility that "Black Reef" parted from "Normandien" on the way down, along a fracture. We have seen a few instances of this with float. For example, this three piece jigsaw.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Oct 3 2017, 06:14 AM
Post #67


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Arm/drill issues after placing a sample from Ogunquit Beach in CheMin prevented the drive on sol 1833. That presented an opportunity to take another look at Normandien with ChemCam in Passive mode. It also meant the rover acquired a set of NavCam images with the arm extended smile.gif
MS ICE managed to assemble these three frames. 'Curiosity looking back at its path', I hope others will properly assemble these.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Oct 3 2017, 07:03 AM
Post #68


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Oct 2 2017, 02:49 AM) *
We now have the R-MastCam frames of the two interesting 1831 ChemCam targets:
...


To my limited geological experience, this looks remotely reminiscent of eroded stalagmites. Clay-loaded cool liquid dropping on a warmer ground would dry rapidly, form uneven layers, and might form small drying bubbles by outgassing or boiling.
As usual in hugely underdetermined data sets, that's just one of an arbitrary number of options.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 3 2017, 10:26 AM
Post #69


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



To add to the range of possibilities... it was suggested that these rocks fell down the slope from higher layers, but I would point out an alternative direction of movement - impact ejecta thrown up from the plains to the north, or even from much further afield. If the material was impact melt, solidifying in flight, the holes might be vesicles (bubbles). Not saying it has to be that, I just want to add to the confusion.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Oct 3 2017, 01:51 PM
Post #70


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 1833.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Oct 4 2017, 01:09 AM
Post #71


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Drive of approximately 13.9m SSE (147º) on Sol 1834 (Oct 3, 2017) LINK
Very roughly processed and roughly stitched partial pan assembled in MS ICE using the L-NavCam's... Poor processing, but a great view smile.gif
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 4 2017, 03:10 PM
Post #72


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Sol 1834 Hazcams reprojected to find the location after the drive - not always good enough, but today they work just fine.

Phil

PS I just spent an enjoyable afternoon with ngunn, a very nice chat about all things UMSF.

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Oct 4 2017, 03:10 PM
Post #73


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 1834.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Oct 4 2017, 07:29 PM
Post #74


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1083
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



On the latest NavCam pics, and due to the low opacity of the Martian atmosphere and our climbing the hills, we are beginning to see clearly some far horizon features (herewith a Sol 1834 pic).
Dear Phil, as our talented Cartographer-in-Chief, could you please give us your opinion with a location on a map ?
Thanks so much in advance smile.gif
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Oct 4 2017, 08:13 PM
Post #75


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Those look like the same features Phil identified in this post.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

24 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 09:22 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.