Iapetus Far-Encounter between June 17 and 27 |
Iapetus Far-Encounter between June 17 and 27 |
Jun 1 2006, 04:30 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
Hi,
as june begins, time to open this thread... As said before there will be another Iapetus campaign in the second half of this month - from 17th until 27th. Unfortunately the minimum distance will only be around 1,3 mio. km, resolution about 8,1 pxl/km. Also the short Celestia-animation again: Iapetus_june_2006.avi.html ( 373K ) Number of downloads: 805 Just remove *.html and run the avi-file preferably on a DIVX-player. Bye. |
|
|
Jun 1 2006, 08:49 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 14-June 05 From: Cambridge, MA Member No.: 411 |
Hi, as june begins, time to open this thread... As said before there will be another Iapetus campaign in the second half of this month - from 17th until 27th. Unfortunately the minimum distance will only be around 1,3 mio. km, resolution about 8,1 pxl/km. Also the short Celestia-animation again: Iapetus_june_2006.avi.html ( 373K ) Number of downloads: 805 Just remove *.html and run the avi-file preferably on a DIVX-player. Bye. That's very cool! Thank you. I've used Celestia before but not to the extent of simulating a flyby. Now that I know it can be done, I'm going to use it. - John Sheff |
|
|
Jun 3 2006, 02:45 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1628 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
Greetings,
Thought I'd mention that I'm continuing to work on some map refinements, particularly to improve the consistency of features near the S/SE boundary of Cassini Regio. The lumpy shape of Iapetus, especially at high southern latitudes, makes it a bit challenging to reproject images onto consistent map locations given the assumption of a spherical (or even ellipsoidal) shape. I wonder if it's worth the exercise of improving my software to optionally include a shape model. Does anyone happen to have an extra shape model for Iapetus lying around? Perhaps I can learn to generate one myself using limb and/or feature fitting? -------------------- Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
Jun 7 2006, 07:38 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2006, 06:04 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Greetings, Thought I'd mention that I'm continuing to work on some map refinements, particularly to improve the consistency of features near the S/SE boundary of Cassini Regio. The lumpy shape of Iapetus, especially at high southern latitudes, makes it a bit challenging to reproject images onto consistent map locations given the assumption of a spherical (or even ellipsoidal) shape. I wonder if it's worth the exercise of improving my software to optionally include a shape model. Does anyone happen to have an extra shape model for Iapetus lying around? Perhaps I can learn to generate one myself using limb and/or feature fitting? What are you assuming for the ellisoidal shape? Are using a=747.1, b=749, c=712.6? -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Jun 8 2006, 06:50 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1628 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
VP,
It turns out I'm still using a spherical shape for Iapetus. I recently noted both a triaxial one (probably the one you mention) as well as an oblate spheroid one using a Google search of some literature. The two were so different I wasn't sure how much benefit using either would be. Perhaps the one you mention is more recent? The main point is that even a triaxial ellipsoid may be only a rough approximation in the vicinity of both the south polar region and the belly band. Perhaps its worth a try though. I have so far used triaxial ellipsoids just in my Mimas and Enceladus map processing. At any rate I've managed to get some improved consistency of the features in southern CR in my latest map update at http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/sos/sos.html#IAPETUS. This version includes PIA08164 from the April flyby. -------------------- Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
Jun 8 2006, 07:25 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
The one I quoted is the most recent one from cassini observations and is in Thomas et al. 2006 (from LPSC, abtract 1639). See if that helps you any.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Jun 12 2006, 08:36 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
|
|
|
Jun 15 2006, 07:47 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
|
|
|
Jun 18 2006, 07:58 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2006, 10:03 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
|
|
|
Jun 23 2006, 09:28 AM
Post
#12
|
|||||
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
Hi,
CASSINI transmitted further 31 Iapetus images. Some widefield pics are also among them - maybe some positioning control or do they probably try to find some Iapetus coorbitals? But these should be about 30° before or behind Iapetus... This was taken: June 21st - 11 tele/4 widefield pics June 22nd - 14 tele/2 widefield pics Here two takeouts , ~3x enlargement: Date: 2006-06-22 Distance: 1.398.591 km Filters: CL1 and CL2 Date: 2006-06-22 Distance: 1.398.128 km Filters: P60 and MT2 And a widefield view: Date: 2006-06-22 Distance: 1.396.785 km Filters: CL1 and CL2 Overview through the Solar System Simulator: Bye. |
||||
|
|||||
Jun 23 2006, 12:12 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1276 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
Looking good!
|
|
|
Jun 23 2006, 02:34 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Some widefield pics are also among them - maybe some positioning control or do they probably try to find some Iapetus coorbitals? But these should be about 30° before or behind Iapetus... Make that 60°... definitely much more than the wide angle field of view. This was a long exposure image, perhaps for optical navigation purposes. -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 23 2006, 06:20 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 28-September 05 From: Orion arm Member No.: 516 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 07:03 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |