IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Iapetus Far-Encounter between June 17 and 27
TritonAntares
post Jun 1 2006, 04:30 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



Hi,
as june begins, time to open this thread... cool.gif

As said before there will be another Iapetus campaign in the second half of this month - from 17th until 27th.
Unfortunately the minimum distance will only be around 1,3 mio. km, resolution about 8,1 pxl/km.

Also the short Celestia-animation again:
Attached File  Iapetus_june_2006.avi.html ( 373K ) Number of downloads: 805

Just remove *.html and run the avi-file preferably on a DIVX-player.

Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jsheff
post Jun 1 2006, 08:49 PM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 14-June 05
From: Cambridge, MA
Member No.: 411



QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jun 1 2006, 12:30 PM) *
Hi,
as june begins, time to open this thread... cool.gif

As said before there will be another Iapetus campaign in the second half of this month - from 17th until 27th.
Unfortunately the minimum distance will only be around 1,3 mio. km, resolution about 8,1 pxl/km.

Also the short Celestia-animation again:
Attached File  Iapetus_june_2006.avi.html ( 373K ) Number of downloads: 805

Just remove *.html and run the avi-file preferably on a DIVX-player.

Bye.



That's very cool! Thank you. I've used Celestia before but not to the extent of simulating a flyby. Now that I know it can be done, I'm going to use it.

- John Sheff
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Jun 3 2006, 02:45 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1628
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Greetings,

Thought I'd mention that I'm continuing to work on some map refinements, particularly to improve the consistency of features near the S/SE boundary of Cassini Regio. The lumpy shape of Iapetus, especially at high southern latitudes, makes it a bit challenging to reproject images onto consistent map locations given the assumption of a spherical (or even ellipsoidal) shape. I wonder if it's worth the exercise of improving my software to optionally include a shape model. Does anyone happen to have an extra shape model for Iapetus lying around? Perhaps I can learn to generate one myself using limb and/or feature fitting?


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TritonAntares
post Jun 7 2006, 07:38 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



Hi,
the first two june-shots of Iapetus are online.

Here an enlargement:
Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-05
Distance: 4.212.487 km (!)
Filters: CL1 and CL2

Remarkable the 2 giant impact bassins, one at the dark-bright border and the other one at the bottom - more difficult to see - in the dark area.

Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jun 8 2006, 06:04 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (scalbers @ Jun 3 2006, 07:45 AM) *
Greetings,

Thought I'd mention that I'm continuing to work on some map refinements, particularly to improve the consistency of features near the S/SE boundary of Cassini Regio. The lumpy shape of Iapetus, especially at high southern latitudes, makes it a bit challenging to reproject images onto consistent map locations given the assumption of a spherical (or even ellipsoidal) shape. I wonder if it's worth the exercise of improving my software to optionally include a shape model. Does anyone happen to have an extra shape model for Iapetus lying around? Perhaps I can learn to generate one myself using limb and/or feature fitting?

What are you assuming for the ellisoidal shape? Are using a=747.1, b=749, c=712.6?


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Jun 8 2006, 06:50 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1628
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



VP,

It turns out I'm still using a spherical shape for Iapetus. I recently noted both a triaxial one (probably the one you mention) as well as an oblate spheroid one using a Google search of some literature. The two were so different I wasn't sure how much benefit using either would be. Perhaps the one you mention is more recent? The main point is that even a triaxial ellipsoid may be only a rough approximation in the vicinity of both the south polar region and the belly band. Perhaps its worth a try though.

I have so far used triaxial ellipsoids just in my Mimas and Enceladus map processing.

At any rate I've managed to get some improved consistency of the features in southern CR in my latest map update at http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/sos/sos.html#IAPETUS. This version includes PIA08164 from the April flyby.


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jun 8 2006, 07:25 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



The one I quoted is the most recent one from cassini observations and is in Thomas et al. 2006 (from LPSC, abtract 1639). See if that helps you any.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TritonAntares
post Jun 12 2006, 08:36 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



Hello,
the next Iapetus-pic is online.

Here an ~4x enlargement:
Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-08
Distance: 3.822.476 km (!)
Filters: CL1 and CL2

No greater change... sad.gif

Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TritonAntares
post Jun 15 2006, 07:47 PM
Post #9


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



Hi,
additional Iapetus-images are online.

Here a takeout , ~4x enlargement:
Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-14
Distance: 2.841.146 km
Filters: CL1 and GRN

To recognize the different bassins, a view through the Solar System Simulator:
Attached Image


Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TritonAntares
post Jun 18 2006, 07:58 PM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



Hi,
a full battery of 37 Iapetus pics has been released .

Here two takeouts , ~3x enlargement:
Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-17
Distance: 2.220.917 km
Filters: IR2 and CL2

Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-17
Distance: 2.219.152 km
Filters: P60 and MT2

An overview through the Solar System Simulator:
Attached Image


Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TritonAntares
post Jun 21 2006, 10:03 AM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



So,
another 51 Iapetus pics are online.

Here two takeouts , ~3x enlargement:

Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-20
Distance: 1.652.638 km
Filters: P0 and GRN

Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-20
Distance: 1.651.831 km
Filters: CL1 and CL2
Quite tall mountain visible on the right limb!

Overview through the Solar System Simulator:
Attached Image


Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TritonAntares
post Jun 23 2006, 09:28 AM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



Hi,
CASSINI transmitted further 31 Iapetus images.
Some widefield pics are also among them - maybe some positioning control or do they probably try to find some Iapetus coorbitals?
But these should be about 30° before or behind Iapetus... huh.gif
This was taken:
June 21st - 11 tele/4 widefield pics
June 22nd - 14 tele/2 widefield pics

Here two takeouts , ~3x enlargement:
Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-22
Distance: 1.398.591 km
Filters: CL1 and CL2

Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-22
Distance: 1.398.128 km
Filters: P60 and MT2

And a widefield view:
Attached Image

Date: 2006-06-22
Distance: 1.396.785 km
Filters: CL1 and CL2

Overview through the Solar System Simulator:
Attached Image


Bye.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Jun 23 2006, 12:12 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Looking good!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jun 23 2006, 02:34 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jun 23 2006, 10:28 AM) *
Some widefield pics are also among them - maybe some positioning control or do they probably try to find some Iapetus coorbitals?
But these should be about 30° before or behind Iapetus... huh.gif

Make that 60°... definitely much more than the wide angle field of view. This was a long exposure image, perhaps for optical navigation purposes.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TritonAntares
post Jun 23 2006, 06:20 PM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 28-September 05
From: Orion arm
Member No.: 516



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jun 23 2006, 03:34 PM) *
Make that 60°... definitely much more than the wide angle field of view. This was a long exposure image, perhaps for optical navigation purposes.
sad.gif
Yes, of course 60° - the Lagrangian points... wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 07:03 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.