IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

26 Pages V  « < 24 25 26  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The MECA story, A place for speculation
Paul Fjeld
post Aug 12 2008, 11:34 PM
Post #376


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 150
Joined: 3-June 08
From: McLean, VA
Member No.: 4177



On Craig's latest Av Week post he writes that NASA will declare Phoenix a success this week. Also he writes:

"The team invited Aviation Week & Space Technology to "embed" here at the Phoenix Science Operations Control Center and attend most of the 14 or so daily meetings to assess the new science results being transmitted 217 million miles to Earth and plan new commands for Phoenix accordingly."

No kidding.

So how do you sum things up here? Craig writes the "White House" bit, the ONLY thing driving speculation - NASA replies beautifully with that release and then presser about nothing "other" than a window into the scientific process (where we get to hear Hecht deliver a clear and concise description of the MECA situation among other things), finally inviting the "offending" publication to embed.

I vote win/win.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Aug 13 2008, 04:08 AM
Post #377


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



QUOTE (Paul Fjeld @ Aug 12 2008, 03:34 PM) *
I vote win/win.


Sounds good to me. NASA shows it has nothing to hide, and rewards a "journalist" who at least showed he had lots of passion about this probe.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Aug 14 2008, 05:16 PM
Post #378


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



New Scientist has an article yesterday that touches on perchlorate and life:

QUOTE
The perchlorate find is a boost in that some Earth bacteria use it as an energy source. "It's like a mineral form of pure oxygen," says Phoenix principal investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona in Tuscon. However, it may have a downside.

In the coming months, team member Carol Stoker of NASA's Ames Research Center in California will use Phoenix data to make a firm estimate of the probability of finding life at the site. Her approach is based on the famous Drake equation, which estimates the abundance of technological civilisations in the universe, based on various prerequisites for their existence. The Phoenix site already ranks higher than all previously explored sites, largely because it has water ice, but Stoker says the site's top billing may not survive.
It all depends on the levels of perchlorate, since too much can be toxic. Phoenix team members are still estimating the concentration, but preliminary results suggest there is too much for life. "It's at apparently very high concentrations, sufficiently high that there's a question of its toxicity," says Stoker.

...

Perchlorate might also provide evidence of the past presence of liquid water. Because the chemical is so soluble, liquid water might concentrate perchlorate at lower depths, where the water would collect. Phoenix is poised to look for exactly such differences. So far it has been digging on top of a pentagon-like hillock, where ice sits roughly 5 centimetres below the surface. But now the lander has moved to the edges of the pentagon, where soil is expected to be much deeper.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

26 Pages V  « < 24 25 26
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th March 2024 - 04:09 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.