IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Nice model, Ice giants vs. Saturn
Rob Pinnegar
post Oct 23 2009, 11:48 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 2-July 05
From: Calgary, Alberta
Member No.: 426



I've been reading a bit about the Nice model recently, and was wondering about a few things.

In a nutshell, this model hypothesizes that Uranus and Neptune started out closer to the Sun than they are today, and then got propelled into their current, more distant orbits by Jupiter and Saturn. There seems to be some speculation that this "propelling" may have involved a couple of relatively close encounters between Saturn, and at least one of the ice giants.

Presumably, these encounters couldn't have been *too* close. A really close encounter would have severely disrupted Saturn's satellite system, and would likely have put the intruding ice giant into a Jupiter-crossing orbit. So a more distant encounter is probably what we are looking for -- something that could have "gently" propelled the ice giant outwards into the proto-Kuiper Belt.

It would also be nice to have some sort of evidence that an encounter of this type had actually happened. This got me thinking about Iapetus's large orbital inclination, which as far as I know has never really been explained. Could Uranus or Neptune have been responsible for that?

Suppose that the culprit was Uranus. The situation becomes more complicated because we have to consider Saturn's effect on the orbits of Uranus' regular satellites, particularly Titania and Oberon. Saturn's gravity would have caused their orbits to become more elliptical. After the encounter, this ellipticity would have been damped over time by tidal forces -- but only if the moons didn't crash into each other in the short term. That might put a lower limit on how close the encounter could have been. (Also, I suppose we also can't have an induced ellipticity large enough to lead to cryovolcanism on Oberon during the damping phase.)

If the perturbing body was Neptune, in some sense things are simpler because one could argue that Neptune lost most of its satellite system at that point, with Triton arriving later only to discover that there was nobody home. However, I don't much care for this, because it substitutes a more complicated explanation for the loss of Neptune's original satellites in place of a relatively simple explanation that already has a very visible prime suspect.

Any comments?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Rob Pinnegar
post Oct 27 2009, 07:10 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 2-July 05
From: Calgary, Alberta
Member No.: 426



It's probably worth keeping in mind here that the proto-Kuiper Belt is thought to have had something like 35 Earth masses just before Uranus and Neptune's migrations started. That's roughly equal to their combined masses.

So Uranus and Neptune would have encountered, and interacted with, a very large number of planetesimals over a short time on their way out. Their orbits would have evolved rapidly, perhaps to the point where further encounters with Saturn were no longer possible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 11:25 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.