Galileo IUS ignition |
Galileo IUS ignition |
Apr 9 2007, 01:33 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 89 Joined: 27-August 05 From: Eccentric Mars orbit Member No.: 477 |
There are lots of pictures of Galileo being ejected from the cargo bay of the space shuttle, but so far I haven't been able to find any pictures of Galileo when the IUS first stage lit up and Galileo departed for Venus. Is this because there aren't any such pictures?
Basically I want to see what a solid fuel motor looks like when it is fired in space. I suspect it is quite different from the billowing gray smoke we are used to seeing when one is lit in the atmosphere. |
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 03:36 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
When you consider that one of the next few flights of the Shuttle after Challenger was scheduled to be the launch of Galileo on a Centaur loaded into the Shuttle's cargo bay, it may not be completely correct that "interim" was a misnomer. There were plans, as of early 1986, to use the Centaur / Shuttle combination for a variety of large payloads, including planetary probes.
Of course, if you talk with Shuttle experts and afficionados, you'll hear the opinion that while Challenger was a tragedy, maybe it was a good thing in one way -- that the systems in place to fly an LO2-LH2 Centaur stage inside the cargo bay were so dangerous that we would have lost an orbiter trying to fly in that configuration. (Just the systems designed to allow fueling of and boil-off from the Centaur stage, IIRC, required major Shuttle safety waivers to be allowed to even be considered for a flight configuration.) But it's good to remember that while the full "space tug" system was never going to be developed, there were plans to go beyond the PAM / IUS set of capabilities. And, therefore, "interim" wasn't necessarily going to be a completely dead concept. (Up until Challenger, of course, after which even the PAM / IUS configurations were considered too risky and phased out.) -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 08:26 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
But it's good to remember that while the full "space tug" system was never going to be developed, there were plans to go beyond the PAM / IUS set of capabilities. And, therefore, "interim" wasn't necessarily going to be a completely dead concept. (Up until Challenger, of course, after which even the PAM / IUS configurations were considered too risky and phased out.) The PAM/IUS was used for Ulysses |
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 11:45 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 22-October 05 From: Cape Canaveral, FL Member No.: 534 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 02:53 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |